Diabetes and estrogen deficit are known causes of osteopenia, diabetes being associated with a low bone turnover and estrogen deficit with a high bone turnover. In the present work, we studied the effect of combined ovariectomy and diabetes on bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) and several bone markers in the rat. Four groups of rats were studied: control (C), ovariectomized (O), diabetic (D), and ovariectomized and diabetic (DO). Twelve weeks after starting the experiments, BMC and BMD of the first six lumbar vertebrae were measured; a bone formation marker (BGP) and a bone resorption marker (free collagen cross-links, PYD) were also analyzed. Diabetic rats showed diminished gain in bone mass, BMC (D: 0.417 +/- 0.028 g, DO: 0.422 +/- 0.020 g) and BMDs (D: 0.171 +/- 0.006 g/cm2, DO: 0.174 +/- 0.006 g/cm2) both being significantly (P < 0.001) lower than those of control (C: BMC 0.727 +/- 0.024 g and BMD 0.258 +/- 0.004 g/cm2) and ovariectomized (O: BMC 0.640 +/- 0.044 g and BMD 0.240 +/- 0.009 g/cm2) groups. Moreover, the BMC and BMD of the C group were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of the O group. BGP and PYD levels were significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the O group (BGP: 138.2 +/- 16.8 ng/ml, PYD: 270.2 +/- 17.8 nM/mM) than those found in the control rats (BGP: 44.7 +/- 4.8 ng/ml, PYD: 165.6 +/- 12.5 nM/mM); the D group showed significantly (P < 0.01) lower values (BGP: 27.4 +/- 14.6 ng/ml, PYD: 55.0 +/- 7.4 nM/mM) than those of the control group. The DO group showed similar levels (BGP: 43.4 +/- 5.1 ng/ml, PYD: 146.7 +/- 14.6 nM/mM) to those found in the C group. Although bone marker levels in the O and D groups were in accordance with those expected in these situations, in the DO group the corresponding levels are apparently "normal." Also, the decrease of gain in bone mass observed after combining estrogen deficit and diabetes (DO group) did not seem to be more marked than that caused by diabetes alone.
We investigated the effects of 17betaestradiol and two selective estrogen receptor modulators, tamoxifen and raloxifene, on the expression and release of constitutive and interleukin-1-stimulated interleukin (IL)-6, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and insulin-like growth factor-1 by osteoblasts in primary culture from trabecular bone of healthy post-menopausal women. After 24 h incubation with 10(-8) M concentration of these compounds, there was no decrease in: a) the constitutive or IL-1beta-induced levels of IL-6 protein released to culture medium; b) the constitutive IL-6 mRNA expression after incubation of osteoblasts with 10(-8) M 17betaestradiol or 10(-8) M tamoxifen for 1, 3, 6, 24 or 30 h. Although a decrease after 30 h of treatment with 10(-8) M, raloxifene was found in mRNA IL-6 expression, and this fact was not reflected by a decrease in the release of IL-6 protein to the culture medium after 48 h of incubation with 10(-8) M or 10(-7) M raloxifene. Tumoral growth factorTGF-betal expression was not influenced by incubation with these compounds. Gene expression of IGF-I increased following 24 or 30 h incubation with 10(-8) M 17beta-estradiol and 30 h incubation with raloxifene. Tamoxifen did not affect IGF-I expression. In conclusion, the effects of estradiol or tamoxifen on bone metabolism do not appear to be mediated through the regulation of osteoblast IL-6 release or synthesis, but raloxifene produces a decrease in mRNA IL-6 expression. The actions of estradiol, tamoxifen and raloxifene do not appear to be mediated by tumoral growth factor TGF-beta1. On the other hand, an increase in IGF-I synthesis induced by raloxifene and estradiol could mediate, in part, the effects of these compounds on bone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.