The aims of the present study were: (1) to determine the existence of sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in fresh ejaculates from Holstein bulls, (2) to investigate the effects of semen cryopreservation and post-thaw incubation on the distribution of spermatozoa within the different subpopulations, and (3) to evaluate the existence of between-bull variation in the sperm subpopulations structure of fresh and frozen-thawed semen. Six ejaculates were collected from each of 9 Holstein bulls and cryopreserved following a standard protocol. Overall sperm motility and the individual kinematic parameters of motile spermatozoa, determined using a CASA system, were evaluated before freezing and after 0, 2 and 4 h of post-thaw incubation at 37• C. Data from 16,740 motile spermatozoa, defined by VCL, VSL, VAP, LIN, STR, WOB, ALH and BCF, were analysed using a multivariate clustering procedure to identify and quantify specific subpopulations within the semen samples. The statistical analysis clustered all the motile spermatozoa into four separate subpopulations with defined patters of movement: Subpopulation (Subp. 1) moderately slow but progressive spermatozoa (23.2%), (Subp. 2) highly active but non-progressive spermatozoa (16.0%), (Subp. 3) poorly motile non-progressive sperm (35.5%), and (Subp. 4) highly active and progressive sperm (25.3%). Subpopulations 2 and 4 significantly (P < 0.01) decreased during cryopreservation and post-thaw incubation (Subp. 2: 21.1%, 18.1%, 8.7% and 5.9%; and Subp. 4: 34.1%, 20.6%, 15.2% and 7.3%, respectively, for fresh, 0, 2 and 4 h post-thaw) whereas Subp. 3 significantly (P < 0.01) increased (10.7%, 27.2%, 27.2% and 30.7%, respectively, for fresh, 0, 2 and 4 h post-thaw). The frequency distribution of spermatozoa within subpopulations was quite similar for the 9 bulls, either in fresh or frozen-thawed semen, and differences among bulls were mainly due to differences in the Subp. Muiño et al. / Animal Reproduction Science 109 (2008) [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] were found between the proportions of spermatozoa assigned to Subp. 4 in the fresh ejaculates and those in frozen-thawed semen after 0 (r = 0.473), 2 (r = 0.513) and 4 h post-thaw (r = 0.450). This indicated that the ejaculates with the highest subpopulations of rapid and progressive sperm were also the most resistant to cryopreservation and showed the best post-thaw sperm longevity.
The nuclear stage at which oocytes are cryopreserved influences further development ability and cryopreservation affects ultrastructure of both cumulus cells and the oocyte. In this work, we analyze the effects of vitrification at different nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation stages on the oocyte ultrastructure and developmental ability. Culture in TCM199 + PVA with roscovitine 25 M during 24 h led to meiotic arrest (MA) in cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), while permissive in vitro maturation (IVM) was performed in TCM199, 10% FCS, FSH-LH and 17b-estradiol for 24 h. Oocytes were vitrified using the open pulled straw method (OPS) with minor modifications. Fresh and vitrified/warmed COCs were fixed as immature, after IVM, after meiotic arrest (MA) and after MA + IVM.Vitrification combined with MA followed by IVM produced the highest rates of degeneration, regardless of the vitrification time. As a consequence, lower proportions of embryos cleaved in these groups, although differences were eliminated at the five-eight cell stage. Development rates up to day 8 were similar in all experimental groups, being significantly lower than those in fresh controls. Only oocytes vitrified after IVM were able to give blastociysts. The morphological alterations observed can be responsible for compromised development. More research is needed to explain the low survival rates of the bovine oocyte after vitrification and warming. #
The aim of this study was to identify different motile sperm subpopulations in ejaculates from an autochthonous bull breed (Bos taurus) and to determine possible modifications in these subpopulations resulting from cryopreservation. Ejaculates were collected and cryopreserved following a conventional protocol. The overall sperm motility and the kinematic parameters of individual spermatozoa were evaluated in fresh ejaculates, after 4 h at 5 8C, and at 0 and 2 h postthaw. A multivariate clustering procedure separated 23,585 motile spermatozoa into four subpopulations: Subpopulation 1 showed medium velocity (VCL: 99.4 AE 17.8 mm/sec) and high progressiveness (LIN: 65.1 AE 14.0%); Subpopulation 2 included spermatozoa with high velocity (VCL: 148.7 AE 25.6 mm/sec) but a nonprogressive trajectory (LIN: 33.1 AE 10.5%); Subpopulation 3 represented slowly motile (VCL: 58.3 AE 24.3 mm/sec) and nonprogressive sperm (LIN: 39.6 AE 18.3%); and Subpopulation 4 included very rapid (VCL: 152.8 AE 25.7 mm/sec) and highly progressive sperm (LIN: 70.9 AE 13.7%). Subpopulation 4 was present in the greatest quantity in fresh ejaculates (36%), but after cooling, it significantly decreased (21%) concomitantly with an increase (P < 0.001) in Subpopulation 2 (from 21% in fresh to 34% in postcooled semen). After freezing and thawing, the overall sperm motility was reduced, mainly due to Subpopulation 2 decreasing from 34% after cooling to 14% after thawing. Differences among bulls in the frequency distribution of spermatozoa within subpopulations were evidenced after thawing by different proportions of spermatozoa in Subpopulations 2 and 4. The current results indicate that a structure of four sperm subpopulations may be a common characteristic of bovine ejaculates and that the cooling phase of cryopreservation seems to be the determinant of postthaw semen quality. #
Aim: To investigate the presence of Neospora caninum in semen and blood, and the development of specific antibody and interferon-gamma (IFN-g) responses in experimentally infected bulls. Methods: Eight bulls were intravenously infected with 10 8 live N. caninum tachyzoites of NC-1 isolate. The presence of N. caninum in semen and blood was assessed using a nested-PCR procedure. PCR-positive semen samples were bioassayed using a BALB/c nu/nu mouse model. Specific anti-N. caninum antibody and IFN-g responses were also examined. In parallel, eight seronegative bulls were studied as non-infected controls. All bulls were monitored for 26 weeks. Results: All eight experimentally infected bulls showed N. caninum DNA in their semen and/or blood samples at some time during the course of the study. Parasite load in semen ranged from 0.1 to 14.5 parasites/ml (mean 6.0). N. caninum could not be detected in BALB/c nu/nu mice inoculated with PCR-positive semen samples. A significant increase in mean serum specific IgM antibody response to N. caninum was detected between 10 and 28 days post-infection (p.i.). Serum specific IgG, IgG1, and IgG2 antibody levels in experimentally infected bulls were significantly different after 21, 10, and 14 days p.i. as compared to controls, respectively. Specific anti-N. caninum IgG were detected in seminal plasma from infected bulls and values obtained were different from controls after 25 days p.i. Mean specific IFN-g responses in experimentally infected bulls were significantly higher than controls 3 days p.i. Conclusions: This is the first study to report the presence of N. caninum DNA in the semen and blood of experimentally infected bulls. Our observations indicate an intermittent presence of N. caninum in low numbers in semen and associated with chronic stage of the infection. This study is also the first to report the detection of anti-N. caninum IgG in seminal plasma of experimentally infected bulls. #
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.