g Cutinases have shown potential for hydrolysis of the recalcitrant synthetic polymer polyethylene terephthalate (PET). We have shown previously that the rate of this hydrolysis can be enhanced by the addition of hydrophobins, small fungal proteins that can alter the physicochemical properties of surfaces. Here we have investigated whether the PET-hydrolyzing activity of a bacterial cutinase from Thermobifida cellulosilytica (Thc_Cut1) would be further enhanced by fusion to one of three Trichoderma hydrophobins, i.e., the class II hydrophobins HFB4 and HFB7 and the pseudo-class I hydrophobin HFB9b. The fusion enzymes exhibited decreased k cat values on soluble substrates (p-nitrophenyl acetate and p-nitrophenyl butyrate) and strongly decreased the hydrophilicity of glass but caused only small changes in the hydrophobicity of PET. When the enzyme was fused to HFB4 or HFB7, the hydrolysis of PET was enhanced >16-fold over the level with the free enzyme, while a mixture of the enzyme and the hydrophobins led only to a 4-fold increase at most. Fusion with the non-class II hydrophobin HFB9b did not increase the rate of hydrolysis over that of the enzyme-hydrophobin mixture, but HFB9b performed best when PET was preincubated with the hydrophobins before enzyme treatment. The pattern of hydrolysis by the fusion enzymes differed from that of Thc_Cut1 as the concentration of the product mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate relative to that of the main product, terephthalic acid, increased. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis revealed an increased scattering contrast of the fusion proteins over that of the free proteins, suggesting a change in conformation or enhanced protein aggregation. Our data show that the level of hydrolysis of PET by cutinase can be significantly increased by fusion to hydrophobins. The data further suggest that this likely involves binding of the hydrophobins to the cutinase and changes in the conformation of its active center. P olyethylene terephthalate (PET) is the best-known and most widespread synthetic polyester in the world. It is used for foils and bottles as well as for fibers for the textile industry (1). Recycling of PET and modification of its properties for different applications by traditional procedures involve harsh chemical and physicochemical treatments (2, 3). Enzymatic modification, particularly by cutinases, has been recognized as a powerful alternative in the past decade (4, 5) and, besides offering new avenues for PET recycling, has the additional advantage of creating a modified PET with increased dyeing efficacy and improved binding to polyvinyl chloride without altering the polymer's bulk properties (4, 5).On the other hand, enzymatic hydrolysis of PET has the inherent disadvantage of occurring at a very low rate (5, 6). The reasons for this are not yet clearly understood. The access of the active center of the cutinase to the insoluble substrate is apparently one of the rate-limiting points, because enlarging the areas around the active sites of cutinases from Fus...

No abstract

Cutinase 1 from Thermobifida cellulosilytica is reported for the first time as an efficient biocatalyst in polycondensation reactions. Under thin film conditions the covalently immobilized enzyme catalyzes the synthesis of oligoesters of dimetil adipate with different polyols leading to higher Mw (~1900) and Mn (~1000) if compared to lipase B from Candida antarctica or cutinase from Humicola insolens. Computational analysis discloses the structural features that make this enzyme readily accessible to substrates and optimally suited for covalent immobilization. As lipases and other cutinase enzymes, it presents hydrophobic superficial regions around the active site. However, molecular dynamics simulations indicate the absence of interfacial activation, similarly to what already documented for lipase B from Candida antarctica. Notably, cutinase from Humicola insolens displays a “breathing like” conformational movement, which modifies the accessibility of the active site. These observations stimulate wider experimental and bioinformatics studies aiming at a systematic comparison of functional differences between cutinases and lipases