No abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate gait asymmetry in chronic stroke patients in comparison with subjects with no known asymmetries. Further, we wanted to decide which gait symmetry parameter has the best ability to discriminate between the two groups. Twenty subjects with hemiplegia (mean age 58 years, S.D.=8 years) and 57 subjects with no known gait asymmetry (mean age 77 years, S.D.=5 years) walked six times along a 7-m walkway at slow, preferred and fast speed. Measures of vertical, anteroposterior, and mediolateral trunk asymmetry were assessed from triaxial accelerometry data. The footfall parameters of single support (% of stride time) and step length (m) asymmetry were assessed from data obtained using an electronic walkway. Vertical (p<0.001), anteroposterior (p=0.01), mediolateral (p=0.01) trunk movement and single support (p=0.03) showed significant differences in asymmetry between the two groups. No difference in step length asymmetry was found between the two groups. Neither single support asymmetry nor step length asymmetry showed the ability to discriminate subjects with hemiplegic gait from subjects in the comparison group. Measures of trunk movement asymmetry, however, were able to discriminate between the two groups (p

Gait symmetry is often a goal for physiotherapy in patients with hip osteoarthritis and after total hip replacement. However, there is no agreement on criteria for pathological gait asymmetry. In this study we investigated discriminative abilities of trunk and footfall gait symmetry measures, and thereafter assessed whether a 10% cutoff value is valid as a general criterion of pathological gait asymmetry across measures. Anteroposterior, vertical, and mediolateral trunk symmetry, single support, and step length symmetry were obtained simultaneously by trunk accelerometry and an electronic walkway in 37 patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis and 56 controls. Subjects walked six times along a 7-meter walkway at slow, preferred, and fast speed, before data were normalized for gait velocity. Anteroposterior, vertical, and single support symmetry measures showed best discriminating abilities. The general 10% criterion of gait asymmetry and optimal cutoff criteria calculated for each symmetry measure showed approximately equal total classification ability. However, the optimal cutoff criteria classified a high number of controls as having pathological gait asymmetry. The general criterion of 10% is valid with high total classification ability, does not classify asymmetry in able-bodied subjects as pathological, and is feasible for use on individual patients in the clinic as well as in research.

No abstract

Early improvements were seen in self-reported function, suggesting immediate relief from stiffness and pain, while gait symmetry and velocity improved later postoperatively, suggesting that gait quality and performance require prolonged rehabilitation with postoperative guidance, muscular strengthening and motor relearning.