Background.A fine needle aspiration biopsy has been established as a safe, minimally invasive procedure in evaluation of salivary gland lesions. The complex overlapping cytomorphology of these lesions are challenging for pathologists, hence the introduction of an evidence-based system, the Milan System of Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology, to improve overall patient care. The study was taken up to reclassify salivary gland lesions from previous FNA biopsies in order to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of FNA, and evaluate the risk of malignancy of the various categories of the Milan system.Methodology. This was a 6-year retrospective descriptive study in a tertiary medical center. All salivary gland FNA cases were reviewed by two pathologists, and re-classified into the six categories of the Milan System. The number of false positive, false negative, true positive and true negative cases were obtained by comparing with the final histopathology diagnosis, and the risk of malignancy per category were calculated.Results. A total of 76 cases were reviewed and the overall average of the two readers diagnostic accuracy were 85.02% (95% CI: 84.50-85.60%), sensitivity and specificity were 80.77% (95% CI: 79.90-81.60%) and 86.19% (95% CI: 85.70-86.70%), respectively; positive and negative predictive values were 62.16% (95% CI: 60.70-63.60%) and 94.17% (95% CI: 94.00-94.40%), respectively. Conclusion.The Milan System category with the highest risk of malignancy was Malignant (Category VI -100%). FNAB is still a reliable tool for clinicians, and use of the Milan System of Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology is beneficial in increasing efficacy of communication among clinicians to improve patient care.

Glomus tumor is an uncommon mesenchymal neoplasm usually described in the distal extremities, and rarely involving visceral organs. We report the case of a 27-year-old Filipino female who presented with episodes of dizziness and weakness, associated with a low hemoglobin count. Further work-up showed a 5.5 cm submucosal gastric mass, which was demonstrated on microscopic and immunohistochemical studies to be a gastric glomus tumor (GGT). Although rare, GGTs should be part of the differential diagnoses of submucosal gastric masses.