No abstract

Objectives Efforts to safely reduce hospital LOS while maintaining quality outcomes and patient satisfaction are paramount. The primary goal of this study was to assess trends in LOS at a high-volume quaternary care spine center. Secondary goals were to assess trends in factors most associated with prolonged LOS. Methods This is a prospective study of all consecutive patients admitted from January 2006 to December 2019. Data included demographics, diagnostic category (degenerative, oncology, deformity, trauma, other), LOS (mean, median, interquartile range, standard deviation, defined as days from admission to discharge), and in-hospital adverse events. Results A total of 13,493 patients were included. Overall LOS has not changed over time with an overall median of 6.3 days ( p = 0.451). Median LOS significantly increased for patients treated for degenerative pathology from 2.2 days in 2006 to 3.2 days in 2019 ( p = 0.019). LOS has not changed for patients treated for deformity (overall median 6.8 days, p = 0.411), oncology (overall median 11.0 days, p = 0.051), or trauma (overall median 11.8 days, p = 0.582). Emergency admissions increased 3.2%/year for degenerative pathologies ( p =  < 0.001). Mean age has increased from 48.4 years in 2006 to 58.1 years in 2019 ( p =  < 0.001). This trend was observed in the deformity, degenerative and trauma group, not for patients treated for oncological disease. More adverse events were significantly associated with increasing age. Conclusion This is the first North American study to comprehensively analyze trends in LOS for spinal surgery overtime in an academic center. Overall, LOS has not changed from 2006–2019. Various factors that influence LOS appear to have balanced each other. It may also be explained by the changing epidemiology of both elective and emergency surgeries. These findings provide opportunities for intervention and improvement, targeted at the geriatric population, to reduce length of hospitalization.

Purpose Optimal management of the bone flap after craniotomy for intracranial infection has not been well defined in the pediatric population. This study reviewed the outcomes of a single Canadian center where immediate replacement of the bone flap was standard practice. Methods This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent craniotomies for evacuation of epidural or subdural empyema at a single center from 1982 to 2018. Patients were identified using the prospective surgical database maintained by the Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery at BC Children's Hospital. Primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as reoperation at the site of initial surgery for removal of an infected bone flap or repeat drainage of empyema under the replaced bone flap. Secondary outcome was any reoperation for recurrent infection at any site. Results Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria with a minimum of 3-month follow-up from the index intervention. Treatment failure occurred in four patients (17%), all of whom required repeat surgery for further drainage of pus underlying the bone flap. Mean time to repeat surgery was 13 days. Any reoperation for recurrent infection at any site occurred in three patients. Seven out of 24 patients required a second surgery to evacuate empyema (29.2%). Age, sex, epidural or subdural location, osteomyelitis, and bone flap wash were not associated with the primary outcome of treatment failure. Conclusion Immediate replacement of the bone flap in the surgical management of pediatric subdural or epidural empyema is reasonable. Replacing the flap at the time of first surgery avoids the morbidity and costs of a subsequent reconstructive operation.

No abstract