No abstract

No abstract

Aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) are a rare cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Treatment for this type of aneurysm may be microsurgical clipping or endovascular. This decision is based on patient characteristics, aneurysm location and dimensions, along with surgeon and institutional experience. In this study we aim to assess the outcomes of surgical and endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 52 patients who were admitted to Vancouver General Hospital for ruptured or symptomatic PICA aneurysms between 2005 and 2015. Modified Rankin scores were assigned at the time of discharge and at two subsequent follow-up time points. The mean short-term follow-up period post-operatively was 11.1 months and the mean long-term follow-up period was 19.3 months. Clinical and radiological characteristics were collected for all patients. Results Of the 52 patients, two died prior to obtaining treatment. Of the 50 patients who were treated for their PICA aneurysm, 39 presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage while 11 had symptomatic unruptured PICA aneurysms. Overall, 11 patients had endovascular treatment (coil embolization) while 39 patients underwent microsurgical clipping/trapping of the aneurysm. At the time of hospital discharge, patients in the microsurgical group trended towards a better the modified Rankin Scale score (2.3) compared to the endovascular group, though this did not reach significance (3.0) (p=0.20). The long-term score in the endovascular group (1.6) was also comparable to the microsurgical group (1.9) (p=0.55). Conclusion While the early outcomes in patients treated endovascularly appear better, there is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the microsurgical and endovascular treatment groups at shortand long-term follow-up.

Background and Purpose— While unruptured intracranial aneurysms may be discovered incidentally in the workup of chronic headache, it remains unclear whether their treatment ultimately impacts headache severity. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing headache severity after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Methods— MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically reviewed. Results— Data from 7 studies met inclusion criteria (309 nonduplicated patients). The standard mean difference in pre- and post-intervention headache severity was estimated at −0.448 (95% CI, −0.566 to −0.329) under a random effects model. No significant heterogeneity was noted nor was any significant publication bias demonstrated. Conclusions— This is the first systematic review assessing postoperative headache severity following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysm. While a significant reduction in headache severity was observed, further investigation into this phenomenon is recommended before it influences clinical practice. Future study should stratify headache outcomes by aneurysm size, location, and treatment modality.

OBJECTIVE The main goal of preventive treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is to avoid the morbidity and mortality associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A comparison between the conservative approach and the surgical approach combining endovascular treatment and microsurgical clipping is currently lacking. This study aimed to conduct an updated evaluation of cost-effectiveness comparing the two approaches in patients with UIA. METHODS A decision tree with a Markov model was developed. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with living with UIA before and after treatment were prospectively collected from a cohort of patients with UIA at a tertiary center. Other inputs were obtained from published literature. Using Monte Carlo simulation for patients aged 55, 65, and 75 years, the authors modeled the conservative management in comparison with preventive treatment. Different proportions of endovascular and microsurgical treatment were modeled to reflect existing practice variations between treatment centers. Outcomes were assessed in terms of QALYs. Sensitivity analyses to assess the model’s robustness and completed threshold analyses to examine the influence of input parameters were performed. RESULTS Preventive treatment of UIAs consistently led to higher utility. Models using a higher proportion of endovascular therapy were more cost-effective. Models with older cohorts were less cost-effective than those with younger cohorts. Treatment was cost-effective (willingness to pay < 100,000 USD/QALY) if the annual rupture risk exceeded a threshold between 0.8% and 1.9% in various models based on the proportion of endovascular treatment and cohort age. A higher proportion of endovascular treatments and younger age lowered this threshold, making the treatment of aneurysms with a lower risk of rupture more cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Preventive treatment of aneurysms led to higher utility compared with conservative management. Models with a higher proportion of endovascular treatment and younger patient age were most cost-effective.