Background: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) show eye movement abnormalities and frequently complain about difficulties in reading. So far, it is unclear whether basal ganglia dysfunction or cognitive impairment has a greater impact on eye movements during reading.Objective: To analyze eye movement behavior during a natural reading task with respect to cognitive state and dopaminergic therapy in PD and healthy controls. Methods: Eye movements of 59 PD patients and 29 age-and education-matched healthy controls were recorded during mute, self-paced reading of a text. 25 cognitively normal PD patients performed the task additionally in off medication state. Clinical assessment included a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and the motor section of MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS).Results: PD-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was diagnosed in 21 patients. Reading speed was significantly reduced in PD-MCI compared to healthy controls and PD patients without MCI due to higher numbers of progressive saccades. Cognitively intact PD patients showed no significant alterations of reading speed or eye movement pattern during reading. The fixation duration tended to be prolonged in PD compared to healthy controls and decreased significantly after levodopa intake. Scores for executive functions, attention, and language correlated with reading speed in the PD group. Conclusion:The present study is the first to reveal (1) reduced reading speed with altered reading pattern in PD with MCI and (2) a relevant impact of levodopa on fixation duration during reading in PD. Further research is needed to determine whether therapeutic interventions, e.g., levodopa or neuropsychological training, improve the subjective reading experience for patients with PD.
Background Recognizing emotional facial expressions is crucial for social interactions. Cognitive impairment and oculomotor abnormalities are common features of Parkinson's disease (PD) which may contribute to the performance in facial emotion recognition (FER) in PD. Objective The aim of this study was to analyze eye movement behavior during a facial emotion recognition (FER) task with respect to cognitive state in PD patients and healthy controls. Methods Eye movements of 24 non-demented, non-depressed PD patients (12 with intact cognitive functions and 12 with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to MDS task force criteria level 2), and 12 age-, sex and education-matched healthy controls were recorded during visual exploration of 28 emotional (happiness, surprise, disgust, anger, fear and sadness) and neutral faces. Participants were asked to identify the displayed emotion out of a sevenfold multiple choice question. Results PD-MCI patients showed reduced FER with specific impairment of anger recognition. Although the scanned area of PD patients with intact cognition was significantly restricted, they did not differ in FER from healthy subjects. While healthy subjects and cognitively intact PD patients scanned faces with preference for mouth and eyes, patients with PD-MCI tended to look at the center of the face and spent significantly less time fixating the mouth. Conclusions Ineffective visual exploration may contribute to impaired emotion recognition in PD. Visual scanning of emotional faces is altered in PD even in the absence of cognitive impairment. The progression to PD-MCI may result in further deterioration of scanning behavior and FER impairment.
Considerable efforts have been made to evaluate different aspects of saccadic eye movements as potential biomarkers in FIG. 1. Findings during the levodopa (L-dopa) challenge test. A drug challenge test was arranged to characterize the nature of the patient's disabling dyskinesia. The patient was given 500 mg oral L-dopa and was monitored closely throughout one dosing cycle. The temporal and topographic pattern of her dyskinesia is characteristic of diphasic dyskinesia in advanced Parkinson's disease. Inhaled L-dopa was explored to address her wearing-off, but we also observed an improvement and shortened duration of her diphasic dyskinesia.
Saccade performance has been reported to be altered in Parkinson's disease (PD), however, with a large variability between studies as both motor and cognitive impairment interfere with oculomotor control. The aim of this study was to identify different patterns in saccade alterations in PD using a data-driven approach and to explore their relationship with cognitive phenotypes. Sixty-one participants with PD and 25 controls performed eye-tracking (horizontal and vertical prosaccades, antisaccades) and neuropsychological testing. Hierarchical cluster analysis was applied to the eye-tracking data to subsequently compare the clusters based on demographical, clinical and cognitive charac teristics. The three identified clusters of saccade alterations differed in cognitive profiles from healthy controls, but not in PD-related motor symptoms or demographics. The rate of directive errors in the antisaccade task was increased in clusters 1 and 2. Further, cluster 1 was defined by a general disinhibition of reflexive saccades and executive dysfunction in the neuropsychological evaluation. In cluster 2, prolonged saccade latencies and hypometria were accompanied by multidomain cognitive impairment. The cluster 3 showed increased antisaccade latency and vertical hypometria despite lack of evidence for cognitive impairment. Our results suggest that there may be at least two opposing patterns of saccade alterations associated with cognitive impairment in PD, which may explain some of the contradictory results of previous studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.