Permanent hearing loss and vestibular impairment occur frequently in persons surviving meningitis caused by Streptococcus suis.
Vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing is a vestibular function test used for evaluating saccular and inferior vestibular nerve function. Parameters of VEMP testing include VEMP threshold, latencies of p1 and n1, and p1-n1 interamplitude. Less commonly used parameters were p1-n1 interlatency, interaural difference of p1 and n1 latency, and interaural amplitude difference (IAD) ratio. This paper recommends using air-conducted 500 Hz tone burst auditory stimulation presented monoaurally via an inserted ear phone while the subject is turning his head to the contralateral side in the sitting position and recording the responses from the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle. Normative values of VEMP responses in 50 normal audiovestibular volunteers were presented. VEMP testing protocols and normative values in other literature were reviewed and compared. The study is beneficial to clinicians as a reference guide to set up VEMP testing and interpretation of the VEMP responses.
Background: Perilymphatic fistula (PLF) is an abnormal connection between the inner and middle ear. A procedure for obtaining definite proof of a PLF remains elusive, and methods of diagnosis remain controversial. To date, there is no clinically relevant biochemical marker for perilymph leakage. Using proteomic analysis of inner ear proteins, we have previously found unique properties of cochlin, encoded by the COCH gene. We detected 3 cochlin isoforms (p63s, p44s and p40s) in the inner ear tissue and a short 16-kDa isoform of cochlin-tomoprotein (CTP) in the perilymph. Since cochlin was found to be highly specific to the inner ear, we speculated that CTP might also be specific to the perilymph. The aim of this study was to determine whether CTP, a novel perilymph-specific protein, could be used as a marker for the diagnosis of PLF. Methods: By Western blotting, we investigated the specificity of CTP expression in a range of body fluids that included perilymph, serum, saliva and cerebrospinal fluid. To elucidate the detection limit of CTP, serially diluted recombinant human (rh)CTP as well as human perilymph was tested. Results: CTP was selectively expressed in all 20 perilymph samples tested, but not in 77 samples of the other body fluids. The detection limit of rhCTP was 0.27 ng or 0.022 μl of perilymph per well on Western blot analysis. Conclusion: The results strongly suggest that CTP can be a specific marker of perilymph leakage. Moreover, CTP has the potential to be a biochemical marker that allows a definitive diagnosis of the etiology of PLF-related hearing loss and vestibular disorders.
The purpose of this study is to review etiologies and identify the time-course of vertigo presenting in an ear, nose, and throat clinic, and serve as a reference guide for other clinics. The study includes retrospective chart review in a tertiary care, university hospital. The patient data with reported ICD-10 codes as causes of vertigo between April 2005 and December 2007 were extracted from the database. At each visit, the main diagnosis as to etiology, characteristics of the vertigo, its time-course, and patient demographic data were recorded. Of 547 cases, 17 diagnoses were made in 73.9%. Diagnostic categories included peripheral vertigo 72.9%, central vertigo 0.8%, psychogenic cause 0.2%, and unknown 26.1%. Common causes of vertigo were benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) 52.5%, Meniere's disease 14.6%, and sudden idiopathic hearing loss 2.9%. Less common diagnoses were benign paroxysmal vertigo of childhood 0.7%, labyrinthitis 0.7%, and vestibular schwannoma 0.3%. Rare conditions were delayed endolymphatic hydrops, Ramsey Hunt syndrome, otosyphilis, vestibular neuritis, temporal bone fracture, post-concussion syndrome, cerebellar infarction, epilepsy, cervical vertigo, Streptococcus suis meningitis, and psychogenic vertigo. Ninety-nine cases who reported remission of vertigo during the study period had median onset of the remission at 4 weeks. In the ear, nose, and throat clinic at Chiang Mai University, a tertiary university hospital, peripheral vestibular disorders were the main etiology of vertigo. The three most common causes were BPPV, Meniere's disease, and sudden idiopathic hearing loss. Half of the cases who returned for follow up had remitted symptoms within 4 weeks.
Objective: To compare the treatment outcomes and complications of single cycle versus multiple cycles of the canalith repositioning procedure (CRP). Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Academic tertiary referral center; Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Patients: One hundred and forty-three adults who had unilateral posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Intervention: Therapeutic. Patients received either a single cycle or multiple cycles of the CRP in one session. Main Outcome Measures: Rate of negative Dix-Hallpike test (DHT), rate of symptom improvement, dizziness handicap inventory score (DHI), and rate of complications. Results: At the 1st week and the 4th week recall visits after CRP the treatment outcomes between the single-CRP group and the multiple-CRP group showed no significant difference. The outcomes included: 1) rate of negative DHT (1st week: 76.9 and 76.7%, 4th week: 89.5 and 88.2%); 2) rate of complete recovery or improved symptoms (1st week: 92.3 and 91.7%; 4th week: 96.5 and 98.0%); 3) DHI scores (1st week: 22 and 28; 4th week: 6 and 10); and 4) complication rate (1st week: 12.5 and 20%; 4th week: 20 and 0%. Rate of complications in the single-CRP group (6.9%) during the 1st treatment was lower than in the multiple-CRP groups (21.1%) (p-value = 0.013). Conclusion: A single cycle of CRP is as effective as multiple cycle CRP, with a lower incidence of complication and a decrease in the time for treatment. Single-cycle CRP is a more advantageous treatment for unilateral posterior canal BPPV. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02701218.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.