Research question Whether SARS-CoV-2 infection has effects on ovarian reserve, sex hormone and menstruation of women of child-bearing age. Design This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Clinical and laboratory data from 237 women of child-bearing age diagnosed with COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed. Menstrual data from 177 patients were analyzed. Blood samples from the early follicular phase were tested for sex hormones and Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH). Results Among 237 patients confirmed with COVID-19, severely ill patients had more comorbidities than mildly ill patients (34% vs 8%), especially for patients with diabetes, hepatic disease and malignant tumors. Among 177 patients with menstrual records, 45 (25%) patients presented with menstrual volume changes, and 50 (28%) patients had menstrual cycle changes, mainly a decreased volume (21%) and a prolonged cycle (19%). The average sex hormone and AMH levels of women of child-bearing age with COVID-19 were not different from those of age-matched controls. Conclusions Average sex hormone levels and ovarian reserve did not change significantly in COVID-19 women of child-bearing age. Nearly one-fifth of patients exhibited a menstrual volume decrease or cycle prolongation. The menstruation changes of these patients might be the consequence of transient sex hormone change cause by suppression of ovarian function that soon resumed after recovery.

, in Wuhan, China. There are over 1,800,000 confirmed cases worldwide. 1 The pathological process of severe COVID-19 pneumonia is an inflammation reaction characterized by the destruction of the deep airway and alveolar. 2 It is currently considered that lung injury is not only associated with the direct virus-induced damage, but also the immune responses triggered by COVID-19 that lead to the activation of immune cells to release a large number of pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Histologic examination has shown diffuse alveolar damage and mucinous exudate, which is similar to acute respiratory distress syndrome. 2 Aggravation of symptoms always occurs during 5-7 days after onset in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and severe cases develop rapidly to acute respiratory failure. 3 Therefore, it is important to strengthen the treatment to suppress the proinflammatory response and control the cytokine storm at this stage. Methylprednisolone are the classical immunosuppressive drugs, which are important to stop or delay the progress of the pneumonia, and have been proved to be effective for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In a recent study, Wu et al. 4 found the administration of methylprednisolone appeared to reduce the risk of death in COVID-19 pneumonia patients with ARDS, however, of those who received methylprednisolone treatment, 23 of 50 patients died. This is a rather high mortality rate of~50%; therefore, in terms of the indication, timing, dosage and duration, the application of methylprednisolone warrants further investigation. In another study, Zhou et al. 5 endorsed the potential benefits of low-dose corticosteroids treatment in a subset of critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, however, the data was limited to only 15 patients and no control group. Although this is an important issue with regard to the challenges in the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia, the clinical applicability of methylprednisolone needs to be tempered owing to the unanswered questions that remain. To address this issue, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 pneumonia patients with or without methylprednisolone treatment. We studied 46 severe patients with COVID-19 pneumonia at the

HBV reactivation occurs earlier and is clinically more significant in CHC patients coinfected with overt and occult HBV who are treated with pan-oral DAAs compared with IFN-based therapy. It is therefore important to have all patients screened for evidence of overt or occult HBV infection and managed during pan-oral DAAs therapy. (Hepatology 2017;66:13-26).