Background: T cells with edited T cell receptor β-chain variable (TRBV) are involved in the immune response to recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (rHBsAg) vaccine and the production of hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). The immune repertoire (IR) profile and mechanism of vaccination positive responders (VPR) with rHBsAg are not fully understood.Methods: The IR of six VPRs (HBsAb+, HbsAg-) with rHBsAg vaccination was established by the high throughput sequencing technique and bioinformatics analysis and compared with those in five vaccination negative responders (VNRs) (HbsAb-, HbsAg-) who were also inoculated with rHBsAg. The repertoire features of the BV, BJ and V (CDR3) J genes and immune diversity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, respectively, were analyzed for each subject.Results: There was no significant difference in sequencing amplification indices of each sample. However, TRBV15/BJ2-3 demonstrated significantly high expression levels in VPR compared to those in the VNR group (both p < 0.05). Further results showed that the BV15/BJ2-5 level was significantly increased for VPR compared to that of VNR group. Interestingly, the motif of CDR3 in TRBV15/BJ2-5 was mostly expressed as "GGETQ" or "GETQ". Additionally, there was no remarkable difference between the two groups of distribution with respect to the different clone expression levels of V (CDR3) J. Conclusions:The features of IR in the VPR and VNR will contribute to the exploration of the mechanism of the positive response to rHBsAg, and also contribute to development of optimized hepatitis B vaccine, in addition to providing a partial interpretation of the VNR who has a relatively low infection with HBV.

No abstract

SummaryTreatment options for idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) are currently limited, especially for patients who do not respond or are resistant to interleukin‐6 inhibitors. For the first time, we innovatively designed a protocol using rituximab–bortezomib–dexamethasone (RVD) as first‐line consolidation therapy in patients newly diagnosed with iMCD. Furthermore, we adopted a no‐maintenance treatment strategy to simplify post‐remission care. Five patients with iMCD were enrolled (including one with TAFRO syndrome) and underwent the RVD regimen, all of whom achieved partial response (PR) or better. After four cycles of RVD, three (60%) patients achieved PR, while one (20%) achieved a complete response. These five patients, who achieved PR or better, discontinued treatment but remained stable for a median follow‐up of 11 months, with a duration of response of 7, 7, 10, 12 and 13 months, respectively. None of the patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events during the observation period. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that the RVD regimen may be a promising treatment option for patients with iMCD. It was a safe and effective approach that resulted in lasting responses without the need for ongoing maintenance therapy.

Objective: We aim to evaluate the effects of different recovery positions on the adverse events and the patient acceptability in those who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB).Methods: A literature search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, CNKI, Sinomed, and Wanfang databases. The time for the article extraction was until July 2020. The articles were screened by two independent researchers, together with the bias risk evaluation and data extraction. The RevMan 5.4 software was utilized for the metaanalysis.Results: Finally, two articles involving 180 subjects were eligible for this study. Metaanalysis showed that at T0, the alternation between right-side and combined position (CRP) would induce an elevation of post-PLB pain compared with the dorsal/supine position (SRP) [WMD = −2.00, 95% CI (−3.54, −0.47), p = 0.01]. There were no statistical differences in the postoperative pain among the CRP, SRP, and right-side position (RRP). The patient acceptability of SRP and RRP was higher than that of the CRP. Finally, two eligible studies were included, which showed no incidence of pneumothorax and abdominal bleeding.Conclusions: CRP would induce post-PLB pain at T0. SRP was the most acceptable position for the cases that underwent PLB. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of pneumothorax and abdominal bleeding.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020196633.