Dendritic forest-like Ag nanostructures were deposited on a silicon wafer through fluoride-assisted galvanic replacement reaction (FAGRR) in aqueous AgNO3 and buffered oxide etchant. The prepared nanostructures were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy, a surface profiler (alpha step), and X-ray diffraction. Additionally, the dendritic forest-like Ag nanostructures were characterized using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) when a 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) monolayer was adsorbed on the Ag surface. The Ag nanostructures exhibited intense SERS signal from 4-MBA because of their rough surface, and this intense signal led to an intense local electromagnetic field upon electromagnetic excitation. The enhancement factor for 4-MBA molecules adsorbed on the Ag nanostructures was calculated to be 9.18 × 108. Furthermore, common Raman reporters such as rhodamine 6G, 4-aminothiolphenol, 5,5′-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid, and carboxyfluorescein (FAM) were characterized on these dendritic forest-like Ag nanostructures, leading to the development of an ultrasensitive SERS-based DNA sensor with a limit of detection of 33.5 nM of 15-mer oligonucleotide.

Background Recent advances in technology and the Internet have led to the emergence of a phenomenon known as binge-watching. This qualitative study aims to explore experiences and perceptions of binge-watching behavior. The criteria of behavioral addiction were used to examine the characteristics of binge-watching behavior. Methods We recruited 25 self-identified binge-watchers in Taiwan and conducted seven focus-group interviews with them in 2019 and 2020. Before their interview, the participants were asked to complete a brief questionnaire to collect information on their sociodemographic characteristics and binge-watching frequency. Results The participants defined binge-watching behavior as consecutively watching episodes of shows with continuous content, rather than based on the time spent watching or the number of episodes watched. While they felt it may affect their daily routine, they mentioned almost no impacts on their health. Most participants emphasized the pleasure and social functions of binge-watching. This differs from previous studies, which have suggested an association between binge-watching and negative emotions. Notably, while most participants considered binge-watching to be an addictive behavior, they denied that they themselves were addicted. Conclusions Our participants generally reported positive attitudes toward binge-watching. The addictiveness of binge-watching remains controversial. Further studies exploring the possibility of addictive binge-watching and potential mechanisms are warranted.

Nicotine exposure may affect NSCLC is associated with lung cancer in humans. Whether nicotine exhibits carcinogenesis promoted activities in tumor growth still unknown. Nicotine is known to have dichotomous effects on cancer biology, acting like a pro- or anti-carcinogenesis agent. There are different functions between adenocarcinoma and squamous NSCLC cancer cells. Excess generation of nicotine may inhibit mitochondrial metabolism, protein modification, and DNA cleavage. Materials and Methods: We used the H520 NSCLC line obtained from human lung epithelial cells to detected nicotine growth and toxicity using MTT assay and western blotting. The concentration of nicotine stimulated cell growth to correspond to low concentration, while high concentration was cytotoxic. Results: According to MTT assay results, at 1.0 μM nicotine has significantly enhanced the H520 cell viability (%). Nicotine induced lung cancer carcinogenesis through mechanisms of α7nAchR, EGFR, HDAC2/4/5, Cyclin D/Cyclin E, Bcl-2, p-Akt, and inflammatory proteins of NF-KappaB and COX2 increases at 1.0 μM. Apoptosis proteins were decreases at 1.0 μM nicotine by p21, p27, c-jun, and p38α using western blotting. Nicotine stimulates tumor growth is mediated through α7nicotinic-acetylcholine receptors (α7nAChR), possibly involving inflammation. On the other hand, at high nicotine concentrations (> 1.0 μM) with consistent cytotoxic effects and appeared to be due to direct cell kill. Nicotine can prevent apoptosis induced by NSCLC. Conclusion: Therefore, the effects on chemotherapeutics by NSCLC malignant cell lines, nicotine in concentrations as low as 1.0 μM decreased. These mechanisms are responsible for the genotoxic effects caused by nicotine. This leads to downstream effects on decreased apoptosis, increased cell proliferation and transformation. The malignant NSCLC cells respond to the treatment with nicotine in lung cancer, the nicotine-mediated induction of growth may provide one of its links to α7nAchR or EGFR.

Nicotine is active in highly cisplatin-resistant cancer cells; however, there is little evidence for its resistant activity in lung cancer with cisplatin. Many mechanisms of cisplatin resistance have been proposed. The mechanisms of the nicotine treatment of cisplatin-resistant lung cancer for histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) activity is unknown. Nicotine was used to analyze cisplatin-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cancer cell growth. Western blot was used to analyze cell cycle-related proteins. Cancer cell viability (cell survival) was measured with MTT assay. HDAC1 transfected NSCLC cells were used to analyze the direct binding between cytosol and nucleus distribution. Here, using cell viability and migration methods we firstly found nicotine regulated cisplatin-resistant NSCLC cells growth by targeting HDAC1. Expression of cisplatin was negatively correlated with HDAC1. And HDAC1 inhibitor, VPA, in the NSCLC cancer cells were predicted. Further experiments confirmed that HDAC1 directly targeted E2F and cisplatin. Besides, HDAC1 and cisplatin inhibited NSCLC cell growth and reduced expression of E2F and Cyclin E proteins. The use of nicotine compromised cisplatin-induced E2F suppression and cancer cell growth. NSCLC cancer cells co-transfected with nicotine and HDAC1 had a higher cell cycle proliferation. Taken all together, cisplatin interferes with DNA replication kills the cancer cell fastest proliferation; however, nicotine increased detoxification of cisplatin, inhibition of apoptosis and DNA repair, induced cisplatin resistance.