This was a prospective non comparative study conducted at Mahatme Eye Bank Eye Hospital, Nagpur, India. 175 eyes with Pseudo-exfoliation syndrome (PXF) undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification were studied. The study aimed at finding out impact of age, gender, pre-operative Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) and Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) on the intraoperative complications of phacoemulsification surgery in these patients. It was found that association of age, gender and intraoperative complications was not significant (P value -0.0958). No significant impact of preoperative intraocular pressure and intraoperative complications was noted. The mean anterior chamber depth in complicated cases was 2.42 +/-0.37 as compared to 2.72 +/-0.43 in eyes without complications. The relation between these groups was statistically significant (P value = 0.031).

Cornea sparing lasik is useful tool allowing surgeons to preserve the posterior stroma. The study comprised of prospective evaluation of 17 eyes treated with CSL -Cornea Sparing Lasik at Mahatme Eye Bank Eye Hospital, Nagpur India. Our results show that the laser ablation on the corneal flap is safe and effective procedure. The refractive, efficacy and safety outcomes were similar to those in routine Lasik ablation on posterior stroma.

Cataract surgery has evolved over the past few decades with progressive decrease in the size of the incision. Originally from 12 mm intracapsular incision to bimanual phacoemulsification (Micro-Phaco) that has incision size of just 700 microns. In the present comparative PROSPECTIVE study best corrected visual acuity postoperatively and surgically induced astigmatism were compared in routine Phacoemulsification technique and bimanual phaco (Micro-Phaco) 60 eyes were studied. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of patients operated with Micro-Phaco or routine Phacoemulsification. There was difference in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA); average SIA in microphaco was 0.5972 as against 0.8328 in routine Phacoemulsification.

This prospective comparative study included 300 matched patients of different grades of senile cataract. All of them willfully underwent phacoemulsification at the hands of a single experienced surgeon, performing with a single and individual technique {Woodcutter's technique 1 }; half of them were implanted with a foldable intraocular lens and the other half with a non-foldable PMMA intraocular lens. All the patients undergoing phacoemulsification had an improvement in vision. There was no statistically significant difference in the surgically induced astigmatism after implanting foldable or non-foldable IOL.

ABSTRACT:The study comprised of retrospective and prospective evaluation of 30 eyes treated with PRK -Photo Refractive Keratectomy at Mahatme Eye Bank Eye Hospital, Nagpur India. Our results show that PRK is less safe, less effective and less predictable procedure in correcting high and extreme myopia and myopic astigmatism. KEYWORDS: Myopia, refractive surgery, Photo Refractive Keratectomy -PRK, keratome, hansatome, spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, BSCVA (Best surgically corrected visual acuity), UCVA (Uncorrected visual acuity), corneal haze, astigmatism. INTRODUCTION:PRK stands for Photo Refractive Keratectomy. PRK was the first type of laser eye surgery for vision correction and is the predecessor to the popular LASIK procedure. First PRK procedure was performed in 1987 by Dr. Theo Seiler, 1 then at the Free University Medical Center in Berlin, Germany. The main difference between PRK and LASIK is that in LASIK surgery a thin, hinged flap is created on the cornea to access the treatment area, whereas in PRK the cornea's entire epithelial (outer) layer is removed to expose the area and no flap is created. PRK is still commonly performed and offers advantages over LASIK for some patients.PRK advantages includes less depth of laser treatment than LASIK, suitable for patients with a thin cornea, no risk of corneal flap complications and reduced risk of compromised corneal thickness. The disadvantages of PRK are slower recovery than LASIK, best vision takes longer to obtain, increased risk of post-surgery infection, inflammation and haze and more eye discomfort during early PRK recovery, compared with recovery after LASIK surgery. 2 Unlike LASIK, in PRK corneal flap is not created. Instead, the outer layer of the cornea is removed to expose an area for a laser to reshape. This makes PRK a better choice for people whose eyes meet certain criteria, such as having thin corneas or chronically dry eyes. The most significant differences between PRK and LASIK are the initial discomfort and the speed of visual recovery. Recovery from PRK takes a little longer than from LASIK because the outer layer of the cornea needs time to heal.The present study aimed at finding out efficacy, safety, predictability and visual outcome of PRK in high myopia.