ObjectivesTo identify etiologic variants and perform deep dental phenotyping in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI).MethodsThree patients of two unrelated families were evaluated. Genetic variants were investigated by exome and Sanger sequencing. An unerupted permanent third molar (AI1) from Patient1 and a deciduous first molar (AI2) from Patient2, along with three tooth‐type matched controls for each were characterized.ResultsAll three patients harbored biallelic pathogenic variants in FAM20A, indicating AI1G. Of the four identified variants, one, c.1231C > T p.(Arg411Trp), was novel. Patient1 possessed the largest deletion, 7531 bp, ever identified in FAM20A. In addition to hypoplastic enamel, multiple impacted teeth, intrapulpal calcification, pericoronal radiolucencies, malocclusion, and periodontal infections were found in all three patients, gingival hyperplasia in Patient1 and Patient2, and alveolar bone exostosis in Patient3. Surface roughness was increased in AI1 but decreased in AI2. Decreased enamel mineral density, hardness, and elastic modulus were observed in AI1 enamel and dentin and AI2 dentin, along with decreased phosphorus, increased carbon, and increased calcium/phosphorus and carbon/oxygen ratios. Severely collapsed enamel rods and disorganized dentin–enamel junction were observed.ConclusionsWe report a novel FAM20A variant and, for the first time, the defective mineral composition and physical/mechanical properties of AI1G teeth.

The molecular control of tooth development is different between the maxilla and mandible, contributing to different tooth shapes and locations; however, whether this difference occurs in human permanent teeth is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the transcriptome profiles of permanent maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth. Ten participants who had a pair of opposing premolars or molars extracted were recruited. The RNA obtained from cultured dental pulp stem cells underwent RNA-sequencing and qRT-PCR. The transcriptome profiles of two opposing premolar pairs and two molar pairs demonstrated that the upper premolars, lower premolars, upper molars, and lower molars expressed the same top-ranked genes, comprising FN1, COL1A1, COL1A2, ACTB, and EEFIA1, which are involved in extracellular matrix organization, immune system, signal transduction, hemostasis, and vesicle-mediated transport. Comparative transcriptome analyses of each/combined tooth pairs demonstrated that PITX1 was the only gene with different expression levels between upper and lower posterior teeth. PITX1 exhibited a 64-fold and 116-fold higher expression level in lower teeth compared with their upper premolars and molars, respectively. These differences were confirmed by qRT-PCR. Taken together, this study, for the first time, reveals that PITX1 is expressed significantly higher in mandibular posterior teeth compared with maxillary posterior teeth. The difference is more evident in the molars compared with premolars and consistent with its expression pattern in mouse developing teeth. We demonstrate that differences in lower versus upper teeth gene expression during odontogenesis occur in permanent teeth and suggest that these differences should be considered in molecular studies of dental pulp stem cells. Our findings pave the way to develop a more precise treatment in regenerative dentistry such as gene-based therapies for dentin/pulp regeneration and regeneration of different tooth types.