PurposeCommon variable immunodeficiency disorder (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) often associated with severe and chronic infections. Patients commonly receive immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment to reduce the cycle of recurrent infection and improve physical functioning. However, how Ig treatment in CVID affects quality of life (QOL) has not been thoroughly evaluated. The purpose of a recent Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) mail survey was to assess the factors that are associated with QOL in patients with CVID receiving Ig treatment.MethodsA 75-question survey developed by the IDF and a 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) to assess QOL were mailed to adults with CVID. Mean SF-12 scores were compared between patients with CVID and the general US adult population normative sample.ResultsOverall, 945 patients with CVID completed the surveys. More than half of the patients (54.9%) received intravenous Ig and 44.9% received subcutaneous Ig treatment. Patients with CVID had significantly lower SF-12 scores compared with the general US population regardless of sex or age (p < 0.05). Route of IgG replacement did not dramatically improve QOL. SF-12 scores were highest in patients with CVID who have well-controlled PIDD, lacked physical impairments, were not bothered by treatment, and received Ig infusions at home.ConclusionThese data provide insight into what factors are most associated with physical and mental health, which can serve to improve QOL in patients in this population. Improvements in QOL can result from early detection of disease, limiting digestive system disease, attention to fatigue, and implementation of an individual treatment plan for the patient.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10875-017-0404-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose In the past, XLA was described as associated with several inflammatory conditions, but with adequate immune globulin treatment, these are presumed to have diminished. The actual prevalence is not known. Methods A web-based patient survey was conducted December 2011- February 2012. Respondents were recruited from the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) patient database, online patient discussion forums and physician recruitment of patients. The questionnaire was developed jointly by IDF and by members of the USIDNET-XLA Disease Specific Working Group. Information regarding inflammatory conditions in patients with XLA was also obtained from the United States Immune Deficiency Network (USIDNET) Registry. Results Based on 128 unique patient survey responses, the majority of respondents (69 %) reported having at least one inflammatory symptom, with 53 % reporting multiple symptoms. However, only 28 % had actually been formally diagnosed with an inflammatory condition. Although 20 % reported painful joints and 11 % reported swelling of the joints, only 7 % were given a diagnosis of arthritis. Similarly, 21 % reported symptoms of chronic diarrhea and 17 % reported abdominal pain, however only 4 % had been diagnosed with Crohn’s disease. Data from the USIDNET Registry on 149 patients with XLA, revealed that 12 % had pain, swelling or arthralgias, while 18 % had been diagnosed with arthritis. Similarly, 7 % of these patients had abdominal pain and 9 % chronic diarrhea. Conclusions Although patients with XLA are generally considered to have a low risk of autoimmune or inflammatory disease compared to other PIDD cohorts, data from this patient survey and a national registry indicate that a significant proportion of patients with XLA have symptoms that are consistent with a diagnosis of arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease or other inflammatory condition. Documented diagnoses of inflammatory diseases were less common but still increased over the general population. Additional data is required to begin implementation of careful monitoring of patients with XLA for these conditions. Early diagnosis and proper treatment may optimize clinical outcomes for these patients.

SummaryPrimary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of rare disorders. This study was devised in order to compare management of these diseases in the northern hemisphere, given the variability of practice among clinicians in North America. The members of two international societies for clinical immunologists were asked about their management protocols in relation to their PID practice. An anonymous internet questionnaire, used previously for a survey of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI), was offered to all full members of the European Society for Immunodeficiency (ESID). The replies were analysed in three groups, according to the proportion of PID patients in the practice of each respondent; this resulted in two groups from North America and one from Europe. The 123 responses from ESID members (23·7%) were, in the majority, very similar to those of AAAAI respondents, with > 10% of their practice devoted to primary immunodeficiency. There were major differences between the responses of these two groups and those of the general AAAAI respondents whose clinical practice was composed of < 10% of PID patients. These differences included the routine use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg) for particular types of PIDs, initial levels of IVIg doses, dosing intervals, routine use of prophylactic antibiotics, perceptions of the usefulness of subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy (SCIg) and of the risk to patients' health of policies adopted by health-care funders. Differences in practice were identified and are discussed in terms of methods of health-care provision, which suggest future studies for ensuring continuation of appropriate levels of immunoglobulin replacement therapies.

Background: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is increasingly utilized in primary immunodeficiency (PI). Understanding factors associated with treatment experience and satisfaction can optimize patient outcomes. We analyzed Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) survey data to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in relation to SCIG training and infusion characteristics. Respondents' PRO scores were rank ordered into 'best', 'intermediate', and 'worst' tertiles. Predicted probabilities of being in the best tertile with any combination of characteristics were generated for each PRO. Results: In 366 SCIG respondents, higher odds of being in the best PRO tertile were driven by favorable training characteristics (particularly, higher confidence post-training and no training barriers) and efficient infusions (infusion preparation ≤20 min and actual infusion < 2 h). Age (≤17 years old) and treatment experience (> 2 years) increased the odds of being in the best tertiles. Compared with the least favorable training/infusion characteristics, those with the most favorable training/infusion characteristics had higher predicted probabilities of being in the best tertiles: TSQM side effects, 59% vs 4%; convenience, 52% vs 4%; effectiveness, 27% vs 13%; global, 26% vs 3%; PROMIS Fatigue, 44% vs 18%. Conclusions: Increased experience with SCIG consistently improved PROs, but our findings predicted that enhanced training and infusion characteristics improve patient treatment satisfaction beyond that achieved by experience alone.

Background-We undertook a study to determine the impact of Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) and X-linked thrombocytopenia (XLT) and their therapies upon the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients and their families. Materials and Methods-We undertook a survey of patients and their families, who selfidentified as having either WAS or XLT. We assessed the PedsQL™ 4.0, the parent proxy form, and the family impact module. These results were compared with normative data from previously published reports.