Reward-seeking behavior is often initiated by environmental cues that signal reward availability. This is a necessary behavioral response; however, cue reactivity and reward-seeking behavior can become maladaptive. To better understand how cue elicited reward-seeking becomes maladaptive, it is important to understand the neural circuits involved in assigning appetitive value to rewarding cues and actions. Ventral pallidum (VP) neurons are known to contribute to cue elicited reward-seeking behavior and have heterogeneous responses in a discriminative stimulus (DS) task. The VP neuronal subtypes and output pathways that encode distinct aspects of the DS task remain unknown. Here, we used an intersectional viral approach with fiber photometry to record bulk calcium activity in VP GABAergic (VP GABA) neurons in male and female rats as they learned and performed the DS task. We found that VP GABA neurons are excited by reward-predictive cues but not neutral cues, and that this response develops over time. We also found that this cue-evoked response predicts reward-seeking behavior. Additionally, we found increased VP GABA calcium activity at the time of expected reward delivery, which occurred even on trials when reward was omitted. Together, these findings suggest that VP GABA neurons encode reward expectation and calcium activity in these neurons is predictive of the vigor of cue-elicited reward-seeking.

Background: Chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) vapor inhalation is a widely used model of alcohol dependence, but the impact of CIE on cue-elicited alcohol seeking is not well understood. Here, we assessed the effects of CIE on alcohol-seeking elicited by previously learned cues, and on acquisition of new cue-alcohol associations. Methods:In Experiment 1, male and female Long Evans rats were first trained in a discriminative stimulus (DS) task, in which one auditory cue (the DS) predicts the availability of 15% ethanol and a control cue (the NS) predicts nothing. Rats then underwent CIE or served as controls. Subsets of each group received access to oral ethanol twice a week during acute withdrawal. After CIE, rats were presented with the DS and NS cues under extinction and retraining conditions to determine whether they would alter their responses to these cues. In Experiment 2, rats underwent CIE prior to training in the DS task. We also assessed alcohol consumption, aversion-resistant drinking, somatic withdrawal symptoms, and behavior in an open field. Results:We found that CIE enhanced behavioral responses to previously learned alcohol cues, but only in rats that received access to alcohol during acute withdrawal. CIE disrupted cue responses in rats that did not. When CIE occurred before cue learning, male rats were slower to develop cue responses and less likely to enter the alcohol port, even though they had received alcohol during acute withdrawal. We also found that CIE increased alcohol consumption and aversion-resistant drinking in male but not female rats.Conclusions: These results suggest that CIE alone does not potentiate the motivational value of alcohol cues, but that an increase in cue responses requires the potentiation of the value of alcohol during acute withdrawal. Further, under some conditions CIE may disrupt responses to previously learned and subsequently acquired alcohol cues.

Background: Chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) vapor inhalation is a widely used model of alcohol dependence, but the impact of CIE on cue-elicited alcohol seeking is not well understood. Here, we assessed the effects of CIE on alcohol-seeking elicited by previously learned cues, and on acquisition of new cue-alcohol associations. Methods: In Experiment 1, male and female Long Evans rats were first trained in a discriminative stimulus (DS) task, in which one auditory cue (the DS) predicts the availability of 15% ethanol and a control cue (the NS) predicts nothing. Rats then underwent CIE or served as controls. Subsets of each group received access to oral ethanol twice a week during acute withdrawal. After CIE, rats were presented with the DS and NS cues under extinction and retraining conditions to determine whether they would alter their responses to these cues. In Experiment 2, rats underwent CIE prior to training in the DS task. We also assessed alcohol consumption, aversion resistant drinking, somatic withdrawal symptoms, and behavior in an open field. Results: We found that CIE enhanced behavioral responses to previously learned alcohol cues, but only in rats that received access to alcohol during acute withdrawal. CIE disrupted cue responses in rats that did not. When CIE occurred before cue learning, male rats were slower to develop cue responses and less likely to enter the alcohol port, even though they had received alcohol during acute withdrawal. We also found that CIE increased alcohol consumption and aversion-resistant drinking in male but not female rats. Conclusions: These results suggest that CIE alone does not potentiate the motivational value of alcohol cues, but that an increase in cue responses requires the potentiation of the value of alcohol during acute withdrawal. Further, under some conditions CIE may disrupt responses to previously learned and subsequently acquired alcohol cues.