We have generated transgenic mice in which astrocytes are labeled by the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) under the control of the human glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter. In all regions of the CNS, such as cortex, cerebellum, striatum, corpus callosum, hippocampus, retina, and spinal cord, EGFP-positive cells with morphological properties of astrocytes could be readily visualized by direct fluorescence microscopy in living brain slices or whole mounts. Also in the PNS, nonmyelinating Schwann cells from the sciatic nerve could be identified by their bright green fluorescence. Highest EGFP expression was found in the cerebellum. Already in acutely prepared whole brain, the cerebellum appeared green-yellowish under normal daylight. Colabeling with GFAP antibodies revealed an overlap with EGFP in the majority of cells. Some brain areas, however, such as retina or hypothalamus, showed only low levels of EGFP expression, although the astrocytes were rich in GFAP. In contrast, some areas that were poor in immunoreactive GFAP were conspicuous for their EGFP expression. Applying the patch clamp technique in brain slices, EGFP-positive cells exhibited two types of membrane properties, a passive membrane conductance as described for astrocytes and voltage-gated channels as described for glial precursor cells. Electron microscopical investigation of ultrastructural properties revealed EGFP-positive cells enwrapping synapses by their fine membrane processes. EGFP-positive cells were negative for oligodendrocyte (MAG) and neuronal markers (NeuN). As response to injury, i.e., by cortical stab wounds, enhanced levels of EGFP expression delineated the lesion site and could thus be used as a live marker for pathology.
Microglia are the resident macrophage population of the CNS and are considered its major immunocompetent elements. They are activated by any type of brain pathology and can migrate to the lesion site. The chemokine CXCL10 is expressed in neurons in response to brain injury and is a signaling candidate for activating microglia and directing them to the lesion site. We recently identified CXCR3, the corresponding receptor for CXCL10, in microglia and demonstrated that this receptor system controls microglial migration. We have now tested the impact of CXCR3 signaling on cellular responses after entorhinal cortex lesion. In wild-type mice, microglia migrate within the first 3 d after lesion into the zone of axonal degeneration, where 8 d after lesion denervated dendrites of interneurons are subsequently lost. In contrast, the recruitment of microglia was impaired in CXCR3 knock-out mice, and, strikingly, denervated distal dendrites were maintained in zones of axonal degeneration. No differences between wild-type and knock-out mice were observed after facial nerve axotomy, as a lesion model for assessing microglial proliferation. This shows that CXCR3 signaling is crucial in microglia recruitment but not proliferation, and this recruitment is an essential element for neuronal reorganization.
IntroductionRecent work on glial cell physiology has disclosed that these cells are much more actively involved in brain information processing than hitherto thought. This new insight stimulates a new view according to which the active brain has to be regarded as an integrated circuit of interactive neurons and glial cells. Astrocytes in particular are now regarded as direct communication partners of neurons, by dynamically interacting with synapses through the uptake and release of neurotransmitters and receptor-mediated intracellular Ca 2+ signalling (for reviews, see Haydon, 2001;Newman, 2003;Volterra and Steinhäuser, 2004;Schipke and Kettenmann, 2004). Intriguingly, a distinct subset of glial cells in the hippocampus was reported to receive direct synaptic input from glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons. These glial cells expressed the proteoglycan, NG2, and on this basis were regarded as oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) (Bergles et al., 2000;Lin and Bergles, 2003). However, the identity of these cells needs further consideration because the specificity of NG2 as an OPC marker becomes increasingly questionable. Current work suggests that NG2 cells comprise a distinct, heterogeneous type of neuroglial cells (Nishiyama et al., 2002;Stallcup, 2002;Greenwood and Butt, 2003;Aguirre et al., 2004;Peters, 2004).Using transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein under control of the human GFAP promoter (hGFAP/EGFP mice), we have recently reported a co-existence of two types of glial cells in the hippocampus, distinguishable from each other by mutually exclusive expression of glutamate transporters (GluT type) and ionotropic glutamate receptors (GluR cells). GluT type cells were extensively coupled via gap junctions and contacted blood vessels, thus matching properties of classical astrocytes. By contrast, GluR cells lacked junctional coupling and did not enwrap capillaries (Matthias et al., 2003;Wallraff et al., 2004). Moreover, GluR cells co-expressed S100, a common astrocyte marker, NG2, as well as neuronal genes, and hence escaped classification into neurons, astrocytes, or oligodendrocytes.Here we used the hGFAP/EGFP transgenic animal to identify distinct types of glial cells in live slices. We combined ultrastructural analysis and post-recording immunocytochemistry to test whether the two populations of hGFAP/EGFP-positive glial cells in the hippocampus receive synaptic input. Electron microscopic inspection identified synapse-like structures with EGFP-positive postsynaptic compartments. Patch clamp recordings revealed stimulus- Stimulus-correlated and spontaneous responses were quantitatively analysed by ascertaining amplitude distributions, failure rates, kinetics as well as pharmacological properties. The data demonstrate that GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons directly synapse onto GluR cells and suggest a low number of neuronal release sites. These data demonstrate that a distinct type of glial cells is integrated into the synaptic circuit of the hippocampus, extending the finding that synaps...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.