Kata kunci : Pancasila; Kekerasan Atas Nama Agama A. PendahuluanIndonesia memiliki karakter sebagai masyarakat yang berideologi multikultural. Keragaman ideologi , suku, agama, strata social, ekonomi, dan politik merupakan suatu objek peripheral dalam pengelolaan perdamaian melalui revitalisasi Pancasila. Pada satu sisi keragaman Bangsa merupakan suatu kekayaan bangsa oleh karena memiliki panutan nilai moral, etis, dan spiritual . Pada sisi lain maka akan menjadi suatu celah potensi konflik, di mana bila tidak dikelola d e n g a n b a i k a k a n m e m u n c u l k a n disharmonisasi, segregasi dan bahkan dehumanisasi. Pancasila yang berkarakter Bhinneka Tunggal Ika menjadi landasan pandangan hidup dan landasan sistem hukum nasionaldalam mengelola kehidupan pluralitas di Indonisia.Bangsa Indonesia merupakan bangsa yang majemuk. khususnya dalam hal ini pluralitas agama. Dalam masyarakat yang multi kultur/plural, bisa saja terjadi di dalamnya terdapat hubungan antar kekuatan masyarakat dalam varian kemajemukan yang tidak simetris dan hadir dalam bentuk dominasi, hegemoni dan kontestasi. Konflik yang muncul dalam kehidupan keberagamaan muncul karena radikalisasi agama yang tidak memandang kesetaraan antar agama dalam interaksi sosialnya.Dalam negara hukum Pancasila terdapat dua nilai mendasar, yaitu pertama, kebebasan beragama harus mengacu pada makna yang 93

This is a general policy in the form of restitution or compensation from the criminal to the victim of human trafficking crime which becomes a parameter of victim's right fulfilment. The weakness in its formulation leads to lack of firmness of its implementation. In this writing I will make a theoretical study related to restitution law structure for human trafficking victims. This research jurisdically studied about the non-clarity of the policies related to restitution. The method used in this research is law research assisted by library study & evaluation to restitution policy making in human trafficking law enforcement. This research is important because human trafficking is now becoming a trasnational crime which is well structured & sistematically arranged. Human trafficking gives great advantage to the criminal doing it. It is because the victims become a never ending commodity. Some considerations about restitution policy, have negated that human trafficking victims are vulnerable to have a secondary victimization risk. They come face to face with this risk when they deal with the operation of criminal laws, because the law has not fully accomodated the victim's right. That's why we need a legal form in having a victim based approach restitution.

This paper seeks to evaluate minor offenses in the Criminal Code in Indonesia. So far, the value limit for determining minor offenses in Indonesia is increasingly irrelevant to the value of the currency due to inflation. It will cause a gap in criminal law in dealing with changes. As the result, police will do unfair and non-humanistic law implementation. The objective of this study is to identify the importance of revising the lower limit of minor offenses in the Criminal Code in Indonesia. The study used a socio-legal method on the contextualization of Indonesian Criminal Codes related to the categorization of minor offense regulation in Government Regulation No. 2 of 2012 and in Penal Code, by utilizing a humanitarian perspective in law enforcement, especially by police who still charge some minor offenses with 5 years imprisonment. The results confirmed that some changes have been made related to this matter as the Indonesian Supreme Court has made some regulations, such as No. 2 of 2012 on adjustment in minor offense law. This means that all criminals doing minor offenses cannot behold as prisoners in the investigation or prosecution process. The main contribution of this study is to construct a perspective of legal and regulatory issues to emphasize a fair of justice in dealing with minor offenses with a model of humanistic law enforcement. The result is expected to practically contribute and recommend the importance of constructing fairness of justice principle in law enforcement in particular and of revising minor offense sentencing in general.