Background: There is still debate over the benefit of self-management programmes for adults with asthma. A brief self-management programme given during a hospital admission for acute asthma was tested to determine whether it would reduce readmission. Method: A randomised controlled trial was performed in 280 adult patients with acute asthma admitted over 29 months. Patients on the self-management programme (SMP) received 40-60 minutes of education supporting a written self-management plan. Control patients received standard care (SC). Results: One month after discharge SMP patients were more likely than SC patients to report no daytime wheeze (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 5.3), no night disturbance (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.5), and no activity limitation (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9 to 2.7). Over 12 months 17% of SMP patients were re-admitted compared with 27% of SC patients (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.0). Among first admission patients, OR readmission (SMP v SC) was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.7), p<0.01. For patients with a previous admission, OR readmission was 0.8 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.6), p=0.6. SMP patients were more likely than SC patients to be prescribed inhaled steroids at discharge (99% v 92%, p=0.03), oral steroids (98% v 90%, p=0.06), and to have hospital follow up (98% v 84%, p<0.01) but adjustment for these differences did not diminish the effect of the self-management programme. Conclusions: A brief self-management programme during hospital admission reduced post discharge morbidity and readmission for adult asthma patients. The benefit of the programme may have been greater for patients admitted for the first time. The programme also had a small but significant effect on medical management at discharge.
This report assesses Quality of Life (QoL) and its relationship to current symptoms and prospective medical contact among 396 adult patients with asthma. Patients were 16 to 52 yr of age and in the care of family physicians in the northeast of Scotland. All patients had been prescribed asthma medication within the previous 3 mo. Mean %pred FEV(1) was 87.4, mean %pred PEF was 85.1; 41% reported respiratory symptoms every week in the month before interview. Patients completed the SF-36, SF-12, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scales. Although mean scores on the SF-36 and SF-12 were close to population norms for patients without chronic illness, the presence of any respiratory symptoms in the month before interview was related to significantly lower QoL scores on the SF-36 scales of Physical Functioning, Energy, Mental Health, Pain, and Health Perception: the SF-12 Physical Functioning scale, and the SGRQ Symptoms, Impact and Activities scales. Physician contact for asthma in the 12 mo after interview was significantly related to SF-36, SF-12, and SGRQ scores at time of interview; however, when adjusted for symptoms at time of interview, only the SGRQ scales remained significant predictors of prospective physician contact. We conclude that respiratory symptoms have significant impact on QoL among patients with mild asthma, measured by generic and respiratory QoL scales, but that a specific respiratory scale is better able to discriminate patients who will seek physician care for asthma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.