Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) is not well understood at the metabolic level despite being one of the best-studied microbially-mediated industrial processes due to its ecological and economic relevance. Here we present a metagenomic analysis of two lab-scale EBPR sludges dominated by the uncultured bacterium, "Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis". This analysis sheds light on several controversies in EBPR metabolic models and provides hypotheses explaining the dominance of A. phosphatis in this habitat, its lifestyle outside EBPR and probable cultivation requirements.Comparison of the same species from different EBPR sludges highlights recent evolutionary dynamics in the A. phosphatis genome that could be linked to mechanisms for environmental adaptation. In spite of an apparent lack of phylogenetic overlap in the flanking communities of the two sludges studied, common functional themes were found, at least one of them complementary to the inferred metabolism of the dominant organism.The present study provides a much-needed blueprint for a systems-level understanding of EBPR and illustrates that metagenomics enables detailed, often novel, insights into even well-studied biological systems. 3Excessive inorganic phosphate (Pi) supply to freshwater negatively affects water quality and ecosystem balance through a process known as eutrophication 1 . Limitations on allowable Pi discharges from municipal and industrial sources via wastewater treatment have proven effective in reducing Pi levels in many waterways 2 . Increasingly stringent Pi limits for effluent wastewater are expected in the future and hence efficient and reliable Pi removal methods are required. Due to the massive quantity of wastewater treated daily (more than 120 billion liters in the US alone 3 ), any improvement in existing methods should have tangible economic and ecological consequences.Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) is a treatment process in which microorganisms remove Pi from wastewater by accumulating it inside their cells as polyphosphate. These polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) are then allowed to settle in a separate tank (clarifier), leaving the effluent water largely Pi-depleted. EBPR is more economical in the long term 2 and has a lower environmental impact 4 than traditional (chemical) Pi removal 5 , but is prone to unpredictable failures due to loss or reduced activity of microbial populations responsible for Pi removal 6 . This is primarily because the design process is highly empirical due to an incomplete understanding of sludge microbial ecology. Environmental engineers and microbiologists have been studying EBPR since its introduction in municipal wastewater treatment plants over thirty years ago 5 with the goal of making it a more reliable industrial process. Typically, EBPR is studied in lab-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) where the microbial community can be better monitored and perturbed, and PAOs can be enriched to much higher levels than in full scale systems 7 .For th...

Amplification of DNA from soil is often inhibited by co-purified contaminants. A rapid, inexpensive, large-scale DNA extraction method involving minimal purification has been developed that is applicable to various soil types (1). DNA is also suitable for PCR amplification using various DNA targets. DNA was extracted from 100g of soil using direct lysis with glass beads and SDS followed by potassium acetate precipitation, polyethylene glycol precipitation, phenol extraction and isopropanol precipitation. This method was compared to other DNA extraction methods with regard to DNA purity and size.

A rapid, inexpensive, large‐scale DNA extraction method involving minimal purification hasbeen developed that is applicable to various soil types. DNA was extracted from 100 g of soilusing direct lysis with glass beads and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) followed by polyethyleneglycol precipitation, potassium acetate precipitation, phenol extraction and isopropanolprecipitation. The crude extract could be used in PCR directed at high‐copy number (bacterialsmall subunit rRNA) and single‐copy (fungal β‐tubulin) genes.

Ring-hydroxylating dioxygenases (RHDs) are of central importance to bacterial recycling of aromatic hydrocarbons, including anthropogenic pollutants. The database of presently characterized RHDs is biased towards those from organisms readily isolated on anthropogenic substrates. To investigate the extent to which RHDs from extant organisms reflect the natural diversity of these enzymes, we developed a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for retrieval of RHD gene fragments from environmental samples. Gene libraries from two contaminated and two pristine soil samples were constructed. None of the inferred peptides from clones examined were identical to previously described RHDs; however, all showed significant sequence homology and contained key catalytic residues. On the basis of sequence identity, the environmental clones clustered into six distinct groups, only one of which included known RHDs. One of the new sequence groupings was particularly widespread, being recovered from all soil samples tested. Comparison of inferred peptide sequences of the environmental clones and known RHDs showed the former to have greater sequence variation at sites thought to influence accessibility of the active site than that seen between currently known RHDs. We conclude that presently characterized RHDs do not adequately represent the diversity of function found in in situ forms.

The 23S rRNA-targeted probes GAM42a and BET42a provided equivocal results with the uncultured gammaproteobacterium ‘Candidatus Competibacter phosphatis' where some cells bound GAM42a and other cells bound BET42a in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments. Probes GAM42a and BET42a span positions 1027–1043 in the 23S rRNA and differ from each other by one nucleotide at position 1033. Clone libraries were prepared from PCR products spanning the 16S rRNA genes, intergenic spacer region and 23S rRNA genes from two mixed cultures enriched in ‘Candidatus C. phosphatis’. With individual clone inserts, the 16S rDNA portion was used to confirm the source organism as ‘Candidatus C. phosphatis' and the 23S rDNA portion was used to determine the sequence of the GAM42a/BET42a probe target region. Of the 19 clones sequenced, 8 had the GAM42a probe target (T at position 1033) and 11 had G at position 1033, the only mismatch with GAM42a. However, none of the clones had the BET42a probe target (A at 1033). Non-canonical base-pairing between the 23S rRNA of ‘Candidatus C. phosphatis' with G at position 1033 and GAM42a (G–A) or BET42a (G–T) is likely to explain the probing anomalies. A probe (GAM42_C1033) was optimized for use in FISH, targeting cells with G at position 1033, and was found to highlight not only some ‘Candidatus C. phosphatis' cells, but also other bacteria. This demonstrates that there are bacteria in addition to ‘Candidatus C. phosphatis' with the GAM42_C1033 probe target and not the BET42a or GAM42a probe target.