The use of LOCATOR® attachments in implant‐supported removable dental prostheses (ISRDPs) has been evidenced with conflicting clinical behavior in literature. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long‐term clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments by evaluating the frequency of the encountered mechanical complication events (MCEs) and the factors that play a role in attachment wear (AW). The study recruited participants with ISRDPs on LOCATOR® attachments. Clinical parameters, number of MCEs (attachment replacements, attachment loosenings, denture cap‐related events, loss of retention and/or insert, and implant fractures), and AW were recorded. Nonparametric tests were applied for statistical analyses (𝛼=0.05). Baseline demographics for the recruited 47 participants (mean age: 72.0 ± 9.0 years) revealed an implant survival rate of 94.9% (mean observation period: 54.8 months), average peri‐implant probing depths, bleeding on probing scores, and plaque scores of 1.80 ± 1.50 mm, 0.70 ± 0.90, and 0.81 ± 0.90, respectively.MCEs were directly influenced by the time in use (p < 0.001). The most frequently encountered MCEs were loss of retention (p < 0.001) and denture cap‐related complications (p = 0.004). AW was found to be significantly higher in the maxilla than in the mandible (p = 0.028); in the maxilla, the vestibular (p = 0.005) and mesial (p = 0.01) aspects were the most common wear sites. Maxillary implant overdentures revealed more vestibular AW (p = 0.013). In prostheses supported by >3 implants, vestibular (p = 0.046) and mesial (p = 0.032) AW were common. Lingual AW (p = 0.021) was observed more frequently when the support was <3 implants. Loss of retention and AW are the most common complications encountered with LOCATOR® attachments. Therefore, a modification in the attachment design along with an amelioration of the attachment surface may help decrease the maintenance needs and further enhance its clinical performance.

ObjectiveThis retrospective cross‐sectional study aimed to evaluate quantitatively the oral microbiome in the tri‐lobe central cavity of Locator Legacy attachment and verify whether it harbors a different, potentially more pathogenic, bacterial spectrum than the adjacent edentulous ridge.Materials and MethodsEdentulous patients rehabilitated with implant overdentures using Locator Legacy attachments were recruited for this study. The clinical examination comprised probing depths, mobility, peri‐implant, and periodontal health along with intraoral swabs for microbiological evaluation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and candida culture. The swabs were collected from the trilobed cavity of the attachment and the adjacent edentulous ridge. PCR was performed to detect six specific bacteria, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Prevotella intermedia, and Parvimonas micra. Statistical analyses were performed using McNemar's test and Wilcoxon's rank sum test with the significance set to p < .05.ResultsA total of 50 participants with a mean age of 71.5 ± 9.6 years participated in the study. No significant differences in the microbiome were found between samples from the ridge and the attachment. No significantly different numbers in the candida cultures were identified, and the presence of a removable prostheses did not demonstrate a significant association with the prevalence of candida.ConclusionsWithin the limits of this study and the investigated bacterial species, the trilobed cavity of the attachment does not seem to increase the bacterial load.

Objective: To evaluate the potential influence of muscular capacity and facial morphology on facial expressions in children. Materials and methods:A cross-sectional study was carried out on 40 healthy children (ages 9-13), without previous orthodontic treatment. Masseter muscle thickness and anthropometric facial proportions were measured using ultrasound and digital calipers respectively. A three-dimensional infrared face-tracking system was used to register facial expressions. The maximal amplitude of smile and lip pucker (representing maximal lateral and medial commissure movement) were used for analysis. Stepwise regression was used to investigate whether muscle thickness or anthropometric facial proportions were associated with the quantity of commissure movement.Results: When performing maximal smile, children with thicker masseter muscles were found to have more limited displacement of the commissures (R = 0.39; p = 0.036). When performing lip pucker, children with thicker masseter muscles were found to have greater commissure movement (R = 0.40; p = 0.030). No significant associations were found between anthropometric facial proportions and facial expressions. Conclusion:Masseter muscle thickness seems to be associated with facial expressions in children. Those with thicker muscles show more limited commissure movement when smiling, but greater movement with lip pucker. This indicates that masticatory muscles may serve as a surrogate for mimic muscle activity. Facial morphology of the subjects does not seem to be associated with facial expression.