IMPORTANCE Seizures recur in as many as half of patients who undergo surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Understanding why TLE is resistant to surgery in some patients may reveal insights into epileptogenic networks and direct new therapies to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE To characterize features of surgically refractory TLE. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Medical records from a comprehensive epilepsy center were retrospectively reviewed for 131 patients who received a standard anteromedial temporal resection by a single surgeon from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2015. Thirteen patients were excluded for having less than 1 year of follow-up. Patients at the highest risk for seizure recurrence were identified. Intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) analyses generated 3-dimensional seizure spread representations and quantified rapid seizure spread. The final analyses of seizure outcome and follow-up data were performed in June 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The Engel class seizure outcome following surgery was evaluated for all patients, defining seizure recurrence as Engel class II or greater. Intracranial recordings of neocortical grids/strips and depth electrodes were analyzed visually for seizure spread. Fast β power was projected onto reconstructions of patients' brain magnetic resonance imaging scans to visualize spread patterns and was quantified to compare power within vs outside resective margins. RESULTS Of 118 patients with 1 year of follow-up or more (mean [SD], 6.5 [4.6] years), 66 (55.9%) were women and 52 (44.1%) were men (median age, 39 years [range, 4-66 years]). The cumulative probability of continuous Engel class I seizure freedom since surgery at postoperative year 10 and afterward was 65.6%, with 92% of recurrences in years 1 to 3. Multivariable statistical analyses found that the selection for iEEG study was the most reliable predictor of seizure recurrence, with a mixed-effects model estimating that the Engel score in the iEEG cohort was higher by a mean (SD) of 1.1 (0.33) (P = .001). In patients with iEEG results, rapid seizure spread in less than 10 seconds was associated with recurrence (hazard ratio, 5.99; 95% CI, 1.7-21.1; P < .01). In the first 10 seconds of seizures, fast β power activity outside the resective margins in the lateral temporal cortex was significantly greater in patients whose seizures recurred compared with patients who were seizure-free (mean [SEM], 137.5% [16.8%] vs 93.4% [4.6%]; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE Rapid seizure spread outside anteromedial temporal resection resective margins plays a significant role in the surgical failure of drug-resistant TLE. Seizure control after epilepsy surgery might be improved by investigating areas of early spread as candidates for resection or neuromodulation.

Objective: Generalized epileptiform discharges (GEDs) can occur during seizures or without obvious clinical accompaniment. Motor vehicle driving risk during apparently subclinical GEDs is uncertain. Our goals were to develop a feasible, realistic test to evaluate driving safety during GEDs, and to begin evaluating electroencephalographic (EEG) features in relation to driving safety. Methods: Subjects were aged ≥15 years with generalized epilepsy, GEDs on EEG, and no clinical seizures. Using a high-fidelity driving simulator (miniSim) with simultaneous EEG, a red oval visual stimulus was presented every 5 minutes for baseline testing, and with each GED. Participants were instructed to pull over as quickly and safely as possible with each stimulus. We analyzed driving and EEG signals during GEDs.Results: Nine subjects were tested, and five experienced 88 GEDs total with mean duration 2.31 ± 1.89 (SD) seconds. Of these five subjects, three responded appropriately to all stimuli, one failed to respond to 75% of stimuli, and one stopped driving immediately during GEDs. GEDs with no response to stimuli were significantly longer than those with appropriate responses (8.47 ± 3.10 vs 1.85 ± 0.69 seconds, P < .001). Reaction times to stimuli during GEDs were significantly correlated with GED duration (r = 0.30, P = .04). In addition, EEG amplitude was greater for GEDs with no response to stimuli than GEDs with responses, both for overall root mean square voltage amplitude (66.14 μV vs 52.99 μV, P = .02) and for fractional power changes in the frequency range of waves (P < .05) and spikes (P < .001). Significance: High-fidelity driving simulation is feasible for investigating driving behavior during GEDs. GEDs with longer duration and greater EEG amplitude showed more driving impairment. Future work with a large sample size may ultimately enable classification of GED EEG features to predict individual driving risk. K E Y W O R D Sabsence seizures, consciousness, driving, EEG, epilepsy, spike-wave discharges 20 | COHEN Et al.

Generalized spike-wave discharges (SWD) are the hallmark of generalized epilepsy on the electroencephalogram (EEG). In clinically obvious cases, generalized SWD produce myoclonic, atonic/tonic or absence seizures with brief episodes of staring and behavioral unresponsiveness. However, some generalized SWD have no obvious behavioral effects. A serious challenge arises when patients with no clinical seizures request driving privileges and licensure, yet their EEG shows generalized SWD. Specialized behavioral testing has demonstrated prolonged reaction times or missed responses during SWD, which may present a driving hazard even when patients or family members do not notice any deficits. On the other hand, some SWD are truly asymptomatic in which case driving privileges should not be restricted. Clinicians often decide on driving privileges based on SWD duration or other EEG features. However, there are currently no empirically-validated guidelines for distinguishing generalized SWD that are "safe" versus "unsafe" for driving. Here we review the clinical presentation of generalized SWD and recent

There have been few studies of agreement between seizure descriptions obtained from patients and observers. We investigated 220 patients and observers who completed structured questionnaires about patients’ semiological seizure features at the initial clinical visit. Inter‐rater reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa and indices of positive and negative agreement. Patients and observers had excellent agreement on the presence of memory impairment and generalized shaking and stiffness during seizures. In addition, patients under‐reported seizure descriptions more easily observed externally, whereas observers under‐reported change in patient location at seizure end. These findings may guide interpretation of clinical histories obtain in epilepsy care.