The heat shock protein HSP90 chaperones proteins implicated in breast cancer progression, including Her2/neu. HSP90-targeting agents are in clinical trials for breast cancer. HSP90 expression is high in breast cancer cell lines, yet no large studies have been conducted on expression in human tumors and the association with clinical/pathologic variables. Tissue microarrays containing 10 cell lines and primary specimens from 655 patients with 10-year follow-up were assessed using our automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) method; we used cytokeratin to define pixels as breast cancer (tumor mask) within the array spot and measured HSP90 expression within the mask using Cy5-conjugated antibodies. We similarly assessed estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Her2/ neu expression. HSP90 expression was more variable in human tumors than in cell lines (P < 0.0001). High HSP90 expression was associated with decreased survival (P = 0.0024). On multivariable analysis, high HSP90 expression remained an independent prognostic marker. High HSP90 expression was associated with high Her2/neu and estrogen receptor, large tumors, high nuclear grade, and lymph node involvement. Although HSP90 levels were high in all our cell lines, expression in tumors was more variable. High HSP90 expression in primary breast cancer defines a population of patients with decreased survival. Evaluation of HSP90 expression in early-stage breast cancer may identify a subset of patients requiring more aggressive or pathway-targeted treatment. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the prognostic role of HSP90, as well as the predictive role of HSP90 expression in patients treated with HSP90 inhibitors.

These results suggest that the representivity required for each biomarker may be a function of its role in tumorigenesis. Furthermore, these results provide scientific basis for the ASCO-CAP guidelines for assessment of HER-2 expression but perhaps suggest that the 30% figure is still too conservative.

A B S T R A C T PurposeRecent misclassification (false negative) incidents have raised awareness concerning limitations of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in assessment of estrogen receptor (ER) in breast cancer. Here we define a new method for standardization of ER measurement and then examine both change in percentage and threshold of intensity (immunoreactivity) to assess sources for test discordance. MethodsAn assay was developed to quantify ER by using a control tissue microarray (TMA) and a series of cell lines in which ER immunoreactivity was analyzed by quantitative immunoblotting in parallel with the automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) method of quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF). The assay was used to assess the ER protein expression threshold in two independent retrospective cohorts from Yale and was compared with traditional methods. ResultsTwo methods of analysis showed that change in percentage of positive cells from 10% to 1% did not significantly affect the overall number of ER-positive patients. The standardized assay for ER on two Yale TMA cohorts showed that 67.9% and 82.5% of the patients were above the 2-pg/g immunoreactivity threshold. We found 9.1% and 19.7% of the patients to be QIF-positive/IHCnegative, and 4.0% and 0.4% to be QIF-negative/IHC-positive for a total of 13.1% and 20.1% discrepant cases when compared with pathologists' judgment of threshold. Assessment of survival for both cohorts showed that patients who were QIF-positive/pathologist-negative had outcomes similar to those of patients who had positive results for both assays. ConclusionAssessment of intensity threshold by using a quantitative, standardized assay on two independent cohorts suggests discordance in the 10% to 20% range with current IHC methods, in which patients with discrepant results have prognostic outcomes similar to ER-positive patients with concordant results.