Understanding microscopic parameters that control steepness of the temperature variations of segmental relaxation (fragility) and the glass transition phenomenon remains a challenge. We present dielectric and mechanical relaxation studies of segmental dynamics in various polymers with different side groups and backbone structures. The results have been analyzed in terms of flexibility of backbone and side groups of polymeric molecules, as suggested by the recent theoretical works by Dudowicz et al. A comparison of structures with identical backbones and varying side groups and identical side groups but different backbones reveals that the flexibility of side groups relative to the flexibility of the backbone is the most important factor controlling fragility in polymers, while the glass transition temperature T g depends primarily on the backbone flexibility and the side group bulkiness (occupied volume). Based on these results and analysis of literature data we formulated a modified approach to understand the role of chemical structure in segmental dynamics: (i) Polymers with stiff backbones always have high T g and fragility, while (ii) polymers with flexible backbones and no side groups are the strongest; (iii) however, for the most common type of polymeric structure, C-C or Si-O backbone with side groups, fragility increases with increasing "relatiVe" stiffness of side groups versus the backbone. In this class of polymers, lowest fragility is expected when the side groups are of similar chemical structure (or flexibility) as the backbone, as in the case of polyisobutylene, one of the strongest polymers known.

The viscoelastic glass-to-rubber softening transition is analyzed for various cross-linked polymers reinforced with filler particles. We find that the loss modulus peak corresponding to the segmental relaxation process (glass transition) is not significantly affected by the particle surface area in carbon black-filled polybutadiene or by silane chemical coupling of poly(styrene-co-butadiene) to silica. Large differences in shape and magnitude of the peak in the loss tangent (tan δ) vs temperature are noted for these materials; however, this is due to variations in the storage modulus at small strains in the rubbery state, which is influenced by the nature of the jammed filler network. The use of a simple relaxation model demonstrates this feature of the viscoelastic glass transition in filled rubber. It is not necessary to invoke concepts involving a mobility-restricted polymer layer near the filler surfaces to explain the viscoelastic results. Atomic force microscopy conducted with an ultrasharp tungsten tip indicates that there may be some stiffening of the elastomer in the proximity of filler particles, but this does not translate into an appreciable effect on the segmental dynamics in these materials. IntroductionDespite significant research activity on the effect of nanoscale confinement on the glass transition temperature (T g ) of polymers, many controversial issues remain unresolved, as recently reviewed by Alcoutlabi and McKenna.1 Of particular relevance to the field of elastomers is the influence of reinforcing particles on the polymer T g . It is reasonable to expect that physical adsorption or chemical attachment of polymer chains to rigid particles can slow down the polymer dynamics, which might increase the glass transition of the polymer chains near particle surfaces. However, while some published studies show increases in T g upon the addition of carbon black, silica, or other fillers, others report no change in T g or even T g decreases.2-26 The nature of the interfacial interactions between the polymer and particles may account for some of the disparate results concerning the effect of fillers on T g .

The effect of nanosized silica particles on the properties of poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) was investigated for a range of silica concentrations encompassing the percolation threshold. The quantity of polymer adsorbed to the particles ("bound rubber") increased systematically with silica content and was roughly equal to the quantity shielded from shear stresses ("occluded rubber"). This bound and occluded polymer attained a level of ∼12% at a silica volume content of 28%; nevertheless, the glass transition properties of the PVAc, including the glass transition temperature, local segmental relaxation function and relaxation times, and the changes in thermal expansion coefficient and heat capacity at T g , were unaffected by the interfacial material. That is, there is no indication that the local segmental dynamics of the chains adjacent to silica particles differ from the motions of the bulk chains. Interestingly, the volume sensitivity of the segmental dynamics, as determined from the scaling exponent γ in the relation T g ∼ V g -γ in which V g is the specific volume at the glass transition, becomes stronger with increasing silica concentration. Moreover, this dependence of γ increases abruptly at the filler percolation threshold. The implication of this result and possible directions for new research are considered.

We review the literature concerned with the effect of proximity to a filler surface on the local segmental mobility of polymer chains. This mobility is commonly assessed from either the glass transition temperature, Tg, or the segmental relaxation times measured by mechanical, dielectric, or NMR spectroscopy. Published studies report increases, decreases, or no change in Tg upon the addition of carbon black, silica, and other reinforcing fillers. Similarly, the segmental relaxation times have been found to increase or be invariant to the presence of nanometer-sized particles. Some of these discrepancies can be ascribed to ambiguous methods of data analysis; others likely reflect the variation in filler-polymer interaction among different systems. There are unequivocal examples of polymers that have segmental dynamics and glass transitions unaffected by nano-particle reinforcement. However, the general principles governing the behavior remain to be clarified, with further work, focusing on the micromechanics at the particle interface, required for resolution of this important aspect of rubber science and technology.