Polyethylene (PE) and isotactic polypropylene (PP) constitute nearly two-thirds of the world's plastic. Despite their similar hydrocarbon makeup, the polymers are immiscible with one another. Thus, common grades of PE and PP do not adhere or blend, creating challenges for recycling these materials. We synthesized PE/PP multiblock copolymers using an isoselective alkene polymerization initiator. These polymers can weld common grades of commercial PE and PP together, depending on the molecular weights and architecture of the block copolymers. Interfacial compatibilization of phase-separated PE andPP with tetrablock copolymers enables morphological control, transforming brittle materials into mechanically tough blends.
Polyethylene-graft-poly(methyl methacrylate)
(PE-g-PMMA) copolymers were prepared using a combination
of
ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP), hydrogenation, and
atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Approximately 20 PMMA
side chains per molecule with average degrees of polymerization 6,
12, and 24 were grown via a “grafting from” approach
from a Br-substituted linear PE backbone with M
w = 56 000. The resulting graft copolymers were evaluated
as compatibilizing agents for binary PE/PMMA homopolymer blends. The
roles of PMMA side chain length and different compatibilizer concentration
in the polymer blends were investigated, and the mechanical and morphological
properties of blends containing 70% PE and 30% PMMA by weight were
examined. The presence of the compatibilizer reduced the average PMMA
droplet size substantially, even at compatibilizer loadings as low
as 1%. Furthermore, the compatibilized blends exhibited significant
improvements in elastic modulus, yield strength, and scratch resistance
as compared to the binary blends. Adhesion testing confirmed the ability
of PE-g-PMMA to act as an effective PE/PMMA adhesion
promoter. Remarkably, the graft copolymer with the shortest side chains
was the most effective compatibilizer. This counterintuitive result
is tentatively attributed to kinetic limitations in partitioning of
the graft copolymers to the interface.
Poly(methyl
methacrylate)-block-polyethylene-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA–PE–PMMA)
triblock copolymers were prepared by a combination of ring-opening
metathesis polymerization (ROMP), hydrogenation, and reversible addition–fragmentation
chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization. The number-average molar masses
of the PMMA end blocks were varied (M
n = 1, 4, 12, and 31 kg mol–1), whereas that of
the PE middle block was kept constant at M
n = 13 kg mol–1. The copolymers were evaluated as
compatibilizers in PE/PMMA homopolymer blends containing PE in a 4:1
excess by weight. The compatibilized blends displayed significant
improvements in elastic modulus, hardness, and scratch resistance
as compared to uncompatibilized binary blends. The effects of the
PMMA end-block molar mass and compatibilizer concentration on the
blend morphology and mechanical properties were investigated. The
triblock copolymer with the highest-molar-mass PMMA end blocks was
most effective, presumably because of enhanced stress transfer between
phases by virtue of a higher degree of entanglement of the end blocks
with the PMMA dispersed phase.
We
show catalyst localized at the interface can compatibilize polyethylene
(PE) and polylactide (PLA) blends. Telechelic hydroxyl functional
PE was synthesized by ring opening metathesis polymerization, which
reacted with PLA in melt mixing (shown by adhesion and droplet size
reduction). Lewis acid tin catalysts were examined as interfacial
reaction promoters, with the goal of interfacial localization. Stannous
octoate was shown to localize at the interface by transmission electron
microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and improved
dispersion of PLA in PE as compared to uncatalyzed materials and a
nonlocalized tin chloride dihydrate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.