Foam and emulsion stability has long been believed to correlate with the surface shear viscosity of the surfactant used to stabilize them. Many subtleties arise in interpreting surface shear viscosity measurements, however, and correlations do not necessarily indicate causation. Using a sensitive technique designed to excite purely surface shear deformations, we make the most sensitive and precise measurements to date of the surface shear viscosity of a variety of soluble surfactants, focusing on SDS in particular. Our measurements reveal the surface shear viscosity of SDS to be below the sensitivity limit of our technique, giving an upper bound of order 0.01 μN·s/m. This conflicts directly with almost all previous studies, which reported values up to 10 3 -10 4 times higher. Multiple control and complementary measurements confirm this result, including direct visualization of monolayer deformation, for SDS and a wide variety of soluble polymeric, ionic, and nonionic surfactants of high-and low-foaming character. No soluble, small-molecule surfactant was found to have a measurable surface shear viscosity, which seriously undermines most support for any correlation between foam stability and surface shear rheology of soluble surfactants.S urfactants facilitate the formation of foams and emulsions by reducing surface tension, thereby lowering the energy required to create excess surface area (1-3). These multiphase materials, however, are thermodynamically unstable, and coarsen through bubble or drop coalescence, as well as diffusive exchange between bubbles or drops (1, 4-6). Surfactants can additionally be used to control this coarsening rate, with effective foaming surfactants retarding coalescence, and defoamers speeding it. For example, coalescence may be slowed by repulsive forces between the surfactant monolayers adsorbed to either side of the (continuous) phase separating bubbles or drops. Ionic surfactants, for example, introduce electrostatic repulsions (1, 2, 5), whereas nonionic surfactants (e.g., polymers, proteins, or particles) provide steric barriers against coalescence (7-9). Moreover, Marangoni stresses arise when compressional or dilatational deformations drive gradients in surfactant concentration (and thus surface tension). The resulting dilatational surface elasticity resists surface area changes, slowing drainage and rupture of the thin fluid films between adjacent bubbles (4, 5, 10-13).Additionally, surfactant monolayers may exhibit nontrivial rheological responses. For example, the surface shear viscosity η S gives the excess viscosity associated with shearing deformations within the 2D surfactant monolayer. Because surfactant interfaces are inherently compressible, they may exhibit a surface dilatational viscoelasticity η D *, in addition to η S *, even under small-amplitude deformations. This contrasts with incompressible Newtonian liquids, which are well-described by a single scalar viscosity. Moreover, surface shear and dilatational viscosities need not have equal (14), or even compara...

Open-minded people should endorse dogmatism because of its explanatory power. In more careful (but less catchy) words, the purpose of this paper is to provide a reason to accept dogmatism by showing how well it addresses four issues concerning non-inferential justification. In this context, dogmatism doesn't pick out an attitude of stubborn adherence to some doctrine; rather, it is a view about non-inferential justification, 1 the sort of justification a proposition has in any way except in virtue of the justification of another belief. Its basic idea is that certain experiences suffice for prima facie 2 non-inferential justification. 3 In this paper, we will focus on the following version:(Radical) Dogmatism: Necessarily, if it seems to S that P, then S thereby has prima facie (non-inferential) justification for P.Many philosophers overlook the explanatory power of dogmatism because they conflate sensations with seemings. I argue, in section 1, that seemings are distinct from sensations and, in section 2, that sensations are epistemically impotent. These two sections provide the background necessary for appreciating dogmatism's explanatory power. In the subsequent three sections, I show how easily it explains three issues concerning non-inferential justification. The first issue concerns introspective justification and the latter two concern perceptual justification. In section 3, I show that dogmatism can resolve the speckled hen problem. In section 4, I show that it can explain the Reidian intuition that, for some possible cognizer, an olfactory sensation might lead to a justified tactile belief. In section 5, I show that it can explain our ability to make non-inferentially justified perceptual identifications.Despite these virtues, some argue that dogmatism is implausibly permissive in allowing a seeming to provide prima facie justification even if that seeming is produced in apparently inappropriate ways. I respond to this objection in section 6, which will point out a fourth issue that dogmatism explains very well. It is PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES

Microemulsions are thermodynamically stable, fluid, optically clear dispersions of two immiscible liquids. Recent interest in microemulsion systems has resulted from their utility in a broad range of applications including enhanced oil recovery, consumer and pharmaceutical formulations, nanoparticle synthesis, and chemical reaction media. However, the high levels typically required to ensure complete microemulsification and formulation stability often result in unacceptably high residue, contaminant levels, and formulation cost. One way to reduce surfactant requirements in microemulsion systems is through the use of efficient surfactants and interfacially active cosurfactants. We have explored and developed microemulsion systems based on efficient anionic surfactants and glycol ether cosurfactants that are stable to temperature and compositional changes and yet employ low levels of non‐volatile surfactants. These microemulsion systems are finding utility in a range of applications, including consumer and industrial cleaning formulations, chemical reaction media, polymerization, and active ingredient delivery.

Chemical reactions are the most important phenomena in chemistry. However, chemical reactions at buried solid/solid interfaces are very difficult to study in situ. In this research, the chemical reaction between two solid polymer materials, a nylon film and a maleic anhydride (MAH) grafted poly(ethylene-octene) (MAHgEO) sample, was directly analyzed at the buried nylon/MAHgEO interface at the molecular level in real time and in situ, using surface and interface sensitive sum-frequency generation (SFG) vibrational spectroscopy. Disappearance of nylon signals indicated a chemical reaction between amine and hydrolyzed amide groups of nylon and MAH groups on the MAHgEO at the buried interface. The appearance of SFG signals from reaction products was also observed at the buried nylon/MAHgEO interface. The mechanism of the observed interfacial reaction was further analyzed. Temperature-dependent SFG experiments were performed to measure the activation energy of the interfacial reaction, enabling a comparison with that reported for the bulk materials. The interfacial chemical reaction between nylon and MAHgEO greatly improved the adhesion of these dissimilar materials. The detailed analysis of a chemical reaction between two polymers at the polymer/polymer buried interface underscores the utility of SFG as a powerful analytical tool to build understanding of buried interfaces and to accelerate the design of interfacial structures with desired properties.

No abstract