Limited prospective SARS-CoV-2 data in children regarding the impact of Omicron variant in seropositivity have been reported. We investigated SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in children between 1 September 2021 and 30 April 2022, representing Delta and Omicron predominance periods. Serum samples from children admitted to the major tertiary Greek pediatric hospital for any cause, except for COVID-19, were randomly collected and tested for SARS-CoV-2 natural infection antibodies against nucleocapsid antigen (Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 reagent). A total of 506/1312 (38.6%) seropositive children (0-16 years) were detected [males: 261/506(51.6%); median age (IQR): 95.2 months(24-144)]. Seropositivity rates (%) increased from Delta to Omicron period from 29.7% to 48.5% (P-value<0.0001). Seropositivity increased for all age groups, except for the age group of 0-1 year (P-value:0.914). The highest seropositivity rate was detected in April 2022 (52.6%) and reached 73.9% specifically for the age group 12-16 years. No significant differences were detected in seropositivity with respect to gender, origin, or hospitalization status. Median (IQR) antibody titers were higher in the Omicron vs Delta period in all age groups, especially in 12-16 years [32.2 COI (7-77.1) vs 11.4 COI(2.8-50.2), Pvalue:0.009]. During Omicron variant period increased SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was detected in pediatric population, especially in adolescents, implicating either increased transmissibility or reinfection rates.

Aim: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of identified first-line therapies for patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a focus on ramucirumab + erlotinib. Methods: In the absence of head-to-head studies, a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using randomized clinical trial data to evaluate first-line systemic therapies with erlotinib/gefitinib as the reference treatment. Results: For progression-free survival (PFS), ramucirumab + erlotinib was comparable to osimertinib and dacomitinib in the primary analysis. Conclusion: The analysis showed ramucirumab + erlotinib efficacy to be comparable to best-in-class treatment options for previously untreated patients with  EGFRm+ advanced NSCLC. Registration information: PROSPERO ID: CRD42020136247

Objectives To investigate the cost-effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) as first-line (1L) therapy in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using data from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis database. Methods A decision-analytic model was used to estimate the cost per American College of Rheumatology response of at least 50% improvement (ACR50) responder and per patient in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission from a Japanese healthcare payers’ perspective over a 2-year time horizon. Clinical characteristics of patients on ABA-1L were matched with those of patients on ABA second or later line (2L+) or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-1L directly or using propensity scores. Resource utilisation and medical costs were calculated from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database. Parameter uncertainty was addressed by sensitivity and subgroup analyses (age, treatment duration, Japanese version of Health Assessment Questionnaire [J-HAQ] score). Results Incremental costs per member per month (ΔPMPM) for ABA-1L versus TNFi-1L and ABA-2L+ were -1,571 Japanese Yen (JPY) and 81 JPY, respectively. For ABA-1L versus TNFi-1L, ΔPMPM by ACR50 response was -11,715 JPY and by CDAI and SDAI remission 11,602 JPY and 47,003 JPY, respectively. Corresponding costs for ABA-1L were lower for all outcome parameters versus those for ABA-2L+. Scenario analyses showed that ABA-1L was cost-effective over TNFi-1L in patients <65 years for any outcome. Furthermore, ABA-1L was cost-effective over ABA-2L+ for all outcomes in patients with age <65 years, disease duration <5 years and J-HAQ ≥1.5. Conclusions ABA-1L demonstrated a favourable cost-effectiveness profile in RA patients, accruing savings for the Japanese healthcare payers.

No abstract

Backround: The effect of antihypertensive drugs on glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance remains an issue under investigation. There is evidence that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers may favorably affect glucose metabolism, while treatment with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is considered to have an overall neutral metabolic effect. However, the effects on glycemic indices may differ among agents within the same class of antihypertensive drugs. Objective: To evaluate the effects of different fixed-dose single pill combinations of RAS blockers with CCBs on homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Methods: Drug-naive patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) were randomly allocated to open-label fixed, single pill combinations of valsartan 160 mg/day plus amlodipine 5 mg/day (VAL/AMLO group, n = 54), delapril 30 mg/day and manidipine 10 mg/day (DEL/MANI group, n = 53) or telmisartan 80 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day (TEL/AMLO group, n = 51) for 12 weeks. Glycemic indices and HOMA-IR were determined at baseline and post-treatment. Results: A total of 158 patients were included. All treatment combinations effectively reduced blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) to similar levels (all p < 0.001). A decrease in the HOMA-IR index by 22.55% (p < 0.01) was noted following treatment with TEL/AMLO, while an increase by 1.4% (p = 0.57) and 12.65% (p = 0.072) was observed in the VAL/AMLO group and the DEL/MANI group, respectively. These changes were significantly different between TEL/AMLO and DEL/MANI (p < 0.05) as well as between TEL/AMLO and VAL/AMLO (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite similar antihypertensive action, the effect of fixed, single pill combinations with TEL/AMLO, VAL/AMLO and DEL/MANI on insulin resistance is in favor of TEL/AMLO. Trial registration: The study protocol was published online in https://diavgeia.gov.gr/ (No: ΒΘ6Σ46906Η-ΑΕΣ) via the Ministry of Digital Governance, after receiving approval from the Scientific Council and Administrative Council of University Hospital of Ioannina (No. of approval: 1/12-06-2014 (issue 150). https://diavgeia.gov.gr/decision/view/%CE%92%CE%986%CE%A346906%CE%97- %CE%91%CE%95%CE%A3 https://diavgeia.gov.gr/doc/%CE%92%CE%986%CE%A346906%CE%97- %CE%91%CE%95%CE%A3?inline=true