from conditional knockout mouse models reveal that KAP1-deficiency significantly impairs vital physiological processes, such as immune maturation, stress vulnerability, hepatic metabolism, gamete development and erythropoiesis. In this review, we summarize and evaluate current literatures involving the biochemical and physiological functions of KAP1. In addition, increasing studies on the clinical relevance of KAP1 in cancer will also be discussed. Key words: KRAB domain-associated protein 1; Transcriptional co-repressor; Post-translational modification; Chromatin remodeling; KRAB-containing zinc finger protein Core tip: This review article primarily summarizes the current findings of KAP1/TRIM28/TIF1β, with focuses on its biochemical and physiological functions. Both the canonical transcriptional co-repressor function and the transcriptional-independent roles of KAP1 are discussed in detail. We highlight the post-translational modifications and the compartmentalized localization of KAP1 and suggest that the function of KAP1 could be spatial and temporal regulated in multiple physiological circumstances. Finally, we summarize the clinical relevance of KAP1 in cancer and discuss the possibility to translate the mechanistic studies of KAP1 to human pathophysiology in the future. Abstract KAP1/TRIM28/TIF1β was identified nearly twenty years ago as a universal transcriptional co-repressor because it interacts with a large KRAB-containing zinc finger protein (KRAB-ZFP) transcription factor family. Many studies demonstrate that KAP1 affects gene expression by regulating the transcription of KRAB-ZFP-specific loci, trans-repressing as a transcriptional co-repressor or epigenetically modulating chromatin structure. Emerging evidence suggests that KAP1 also functions independent of gene regulation by serving as a SUMO/ubiquitin E3 ligase or signaling scaffold protein to mediate signal transduction. KAP1 is subjected to multiple post-translational modifications (PTMs), including serine/tyrosine phosphorylation, SUMOylation, and acetylation, which coordinately regulate KAP1 function and its protein abundance. KAP1 is involved in multiple aspects of cellular activities, including DNA damage response, virus replication, cytokine production and stem cell pluripotency. Moreover, knockout of KAP1 results in embryonic lethality, indicating that KAP1 is crucial for embryonic development and possibly impacts a wide-range of (patho)physiological manifestations. Indeed, studies World J Biol Chem 2014 August 26; 5(3): 308-320 ISSN 1949-8454 (online)

No abstract

Circadian regulator BMAL1 rewires metabolism in a chronic insulin-treated TNBC model Pyruvate links BMAL1 to mitochondrial bioenergetics BMAL1 suppresses tumor proliferation and metastasis in hyperinsulinemic obese mice BMAL1 influences tumor microenvironment in highfat-diet-fed mice

Oncogene activation, massive proliferation, and increased nutrient demands often result in nutrient and oxygen deprivation in solid tumors including breast cancer (BC), leading to the induction of oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and subsequently triggering integrated stress response (ISR).To elucidate the role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the ISR of BC, we performed transcriptome analyses and identified a lncRNA, UBA6-AS1, which was upregulated upon amino acid deprivation and ER stress. UBA6-AS1 was preferentially induced in triple-negative BC (TNBC) cells deprived of arginine or glutamine, two critical amino acids required for cancer cell growth, or treated with ER stress inducers. Mechanistically, UBA6-AS1 was regulated through the GCN2/eIF2α/ATF4 pathway, one of the major routes mediating ISR in amino acid sensing. In addition, both in vitro and in vivo assays indicated that UBA6-AS1 promoted TNBC cell survival when cells encountered metabolic stress, implicating a regulatory role of UBA6-AS1 in response to intratumoral metabolic stress during tumor progression. Moreover, PARP1 expression and activity were positively regulated by the GCN2/UBA6-AS1 axis upon amino acid deprivation. In conclusion, our data suggest that UBA6-AS1 is a novel lncRNA regulating ISR upon metabolic stress induction to promote TNBC cell survival. Furthermore, the GCN2-ATF4 axis is important for UBA6-AS1 induction to enhance PARP1 activity and could serve as a marker for the susceptibility of PARP inhibitors in TNBC.

The increasing aging and diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in dialysis population make the quality maintenance of dialysis an imperative issue. Recently, an increasing number of dialysis centers were run by private dialysis providers, many of which apply quality assurance programs and performance management systems to dialysis care. We studied patients in dialysis facilities in Taiwan run by a private chain to see clinical outcomes of centers operating under these systemic strategies. Hemodialysis patients from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 in 25 dialysis facilities in Taiwan, which received the management and consultation from a dialysis service provider, NephroCare (NC), were included. Data pivotal to quality of dialysis were analyzed. During a 5-year interval, 5161 hemodialysis patients were included. For volume control, the proportion of patients with weight gain ≥4.5% decreases from 41.7% to 30.2%. Mean Kt/V is 1.74 ± 0.28. Mean albumin level is 3.92 ± 0.38 g/dL. Patients with phosphate <5.5 mg/dL is up to 71.8%. The mean hemoglobin level is 10.70 ± 1.40 g/dL. More than 80% of patients have adequate iron status. Further, 73% of patients use native arteriovenous fistula. Hospitalization-free survival rate was 56% at the fifth year. Patient survival rate at the fifth year was 66.4%. Overall clinical performances were maintained very stable in NC facilities from this temporal data analysis. The hospitalization and survival rate also compare favorably with those reported internationally. These results warrant further studies to justify the application of this kind of quality assurance programs and performance management systems in dialysis care.