Objetivos. Determinar la frecuencia y el valor pronóstico de la anemia en pacientes con cáncer atendidos en el Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN) entre enero y abril del 2010. Materiales y métodos. Se consideró anemia en varones cuando la hemoglobina fue <13 g/dL, y en mujeres cuando fue <12 g/dL. Para determinar asociaciones se usó la prueba Chi-cuadrado. Para el análisis de las curvas de sobrevida se usó el estimador de Kaplan-Meier y log rank test. Resultados. 772 pacientes fueron incluidos; 584 (75,7%) tuvieron tumores sólidos y 188 (24,3%) neoplasias hematológicas. Se diagnóstico anemia en 359 (46,5%) pacientes, en 124 (66,0%) neoplasias hematológicas, y en 235 (40,2%) neoplasias sólidas. Las neoplasias hematológicas con mayor frecuencia de anemia fueron la leucemia mieloide crónica, las leucemias agudas, y el mieloma múltiple (100%, 92,5% y 60%; respectivamente) y en el grupo de neoplasias sólidas fueron los cánceres de origen: gastrointestinal, ginecológico, y urológico (62%, 52,1% y 45%; respectivamente). Recibieron transfusiones 204 pacientes (26,4%). En 762 pacientes se encontró una diferencia en la sobrevida global entre los grupos sin y con presencia de anemia, estimándose a los cinco años en 62% y 47% respectivamente (p<0,001), además se encontraron diferencias en la sobrevida global para el subgrupo de tumores sólidos (p=0,002) y neoplasias hematológicas (p=0,007). Conclusiones. La anemia es frecuente en pacientes con cáncer y su presencia determina un factor pronóstico independiente en la sobrevida global.

Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological care during the first state of national emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic in several public cancer hospitals in Peru. Materials and Methods A multicentric cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted by interviewing adult cancer patients diagnosed and treated between January 2019 and February 2020 from 18 hospitals. This study was carried out in September 2020, the last month of the first state of national emergency. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated, including COVID-19 status and cancer treatment features. Results A total of 1472 patients were included; the median age was 55 years (range 19–97). Most patients (85.8%, n = 1263) had solid neoplasia, 13.5% (n = 198) hematologic neoplasia, and 0.7% (n = 11) others. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 8.6% (n = 126), 1.2% (n = 18) were probable, 1.6% (n = 24) suspected, and 88.6% (n = 1304) negative cases. Overall, 51.6% of patients (n = 759) had cancer treatment delays, 42.5% (n = 626) changed treatment delivery (endovenous to oral systemic therapy), and 12.6% (n = 185) of cases cancer therapy was discontinued. In total, 10.3% (n = 117) of patients whose disease was controlled or in remission, experienced progression of disease during the state of emergency. A total of 6.7% (n = 98) of patients died, of whom 73.5% (n = 72) died from disease progression; 18.4% (n = 18) from SARS-CoV-2 infection and 8.1% (n = 8) from undetermined causes. Patients with hematological malignancies [hazard ratio (HR): 5.11 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99–13.07)] and no response to therapy before the onset of the pandemic [5.01 (1.44–17.42)] had an increased risk of death among COVID-19 infected individuals, whereas advanced clinical stage [5.09 (2.37–10.95)] and discontinuation of treatment [3.66 (1.97–6.78)] were risk factors among non-COVID-19 patients. Conclusion Our study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has an adverse impact on the outcomes of Peruvian cancer patients. In our cohort, cancer mortality was higher than COVID-19 disease mortality.

Background: Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide as well as in Peru. The national cancer plan includes decentralization, but one of the greatest barriers is our complicated geography. San Martin is a department located in the Peruvian jungle where there are no public services for cancer care. Our aim was to implement a "distance telemedicine-enabled" outpatient chemotherapy module, monitored by oncologists. Methods: The implementation was conducted in 3 stages: 1) Planning and Organization: working teams were formed, a chemotherapy room was developed and people were trained. 2) Execution: patients from San Martín region, aged >18 years with pathological confirmation of cancer, requiring systemic chemotherapy, ECOG <3, and first course of chemotherapy received at INEN without adverse reaction were selected. 3) Evaluation: adverse events, cost-user evaluation and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Results: By November 2015, a module with a chemotherapy room with 18 chairs, a pharmacy, a hospitalization room, 1 medical office, a training room, a nutrition area, and a nursing station was implemented. 3 physicians, 3 nurses and 1 pharmacist were trained. Through March 2018, 501 sessions of teleoncology were completed to deliver 232 cycles of chemotherapy for 56 patients aged

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common variant of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for approximately 30% of the NHL cases worldwide. Previous reports have associated certain viral infections with the development of DLBCL such as HIV and EBV, both infections related with an aggressive clinical course and worse outcome. The human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is a retrovirus regarded as the pathogenic agent for adult T-cell lymphoma/leukemia. HTLV-1 is endemic in Japan, the Caribbean basin, South America, and parts of Africa. In Peru, up to 3% of the healthy adult population carries HTLV-1. As data on the impact of HTLV-1 infection in DLBCL outcomes is scarce, we aim to describe the clinical features and outcomes of HTLV-1-positive patients with a pathological diagnosis of DLBCL. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients diagnosed and managed for DLBCL at the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases in Lima-Peru between 2007 and 2019. Patients were evaluated for HTLV-1 infection at the time of diagnosis. Positive HTLV-1 cases were matched to negative HTLV-1 controls based on age, sex, and cancer staging. Treatment responses were assessed according to the Lugano criteria. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-rank test to determine the impact of HTLV-1 infection. Multivariate Cox regression models were reported with adjusted Hazar Ratios (aHR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: A total of 192 patients with DLBCL were identified and had sufficient data for analysis. Seventy (37%) cases were positive for HTLV-1 infection and 122 (63%) were not. Table 1 summarizes the clinical features and outcomes of DLBCL patients according to HTLV-1 status. Overall, the majority of patients were ≥65 years (59%), had ECOG performance status ≤2 (95%) and were stage III-IV (51%) at diagnosis. One third (n=64) of patients had extranodal involvement with 71 affected sites of which bone marrow involvement was frequently found in HTLV-1-negative DLBCL cases (55% vs. 7%, p&lt;0.001) and liver/gastrointestinal tract in HTLV-1-positive cases (48% vs. 9%, p&lt;0.001). There was no difference among DLBCL groups regarding risk stratification based on NCCN-IPI score (p=0.394). With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, we found that in DLBCL patients, HTLV-1 infection had no significant impact in 5-year OS (HTLV-1-positive 40% versus HTLV-1-negative 42%, p=0.930) and EFS rates (HTLV-1-positive 33% versus HTLV-1-negative 32%; p=0.890) (Figure 1). Multivariate cox regression analysis could not identify HTLV-1 infection as a risk factor for higher mortality or disease progression (Figure 1). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest case series describing the clinical characteristics and outcome of HTLV-1-positive DLBCL patients. A study from Japan on early stage localized (head and neck) B-cell-NHL (n=198, HTLV-1 seropositive n=21 and with DLBCL n=12) treated with radiotherapy and/or multi-agent chemotherapy found poorer prognosis on HTLV-1 carriers compared to non-carriers (5-year OS: HTLV-1-positive n=21, 49% vs. HTLV-1-negative n=177, 78%, p=0.007; Hiroaki et al BJH 2003). In this study, we included DLBCL patients with both early and advanced stage disease along with localized and extranodal involvement. We found that HTLV-1 infection had no significant impact on 5-year OS and EFS rates when using conventional therapy for DLBCL. Moreover, we did not find differences in relapsed and mortality rates. Further investigation is needed to confirm the potential impact of HTLV-1 infection in DLBCL outcome. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

No abstract