En diciembre de 2019 se detectó por primera vez en China la existencia del SARS-CoV2, causante de la enfermedad COVID-19. El virus rápidamente se propagó por Europa y Asia, tardándose un par de meses antes de llegar a América Latina. Se ha demostrado que los pacientes que desarrollan una enfermedad severa y que tienen mayor riesgo de mortalidad por COVID-19 son aquellos con edades avanzadas y que presentan por lo menos una enfermedad crónica, incluyendo el cáncer. Debido a lo anterior, surgen muchas dudas en el grupo de profesionales encargados de brindar tratamiento a pacientes con cáncer durante la pandemia, pues se debe equilibrar el riesgo-beneficio de proveer tratamiento a pacientes que se encuentran de base con un riesgo incrementado para tener manifestaciones severas por COVID-19. En este consenso planteamos recomendaciones para los profesionales en hematología que brindan tratamiento a pacientes que padecen de algún tipo de linfoma, con el fin de aclarar el panorama clínico durante la pandemia.

Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological care during the first state of national emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic in several public cancer hospitals in Peru. Materials and Methods A multicentric cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted by interviewing adult cancer patients diagnosed and treated between January 2019 and February 2020 from 18 hospitals. This study was carried out in September 2020, the last month of the first state of national emergency. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated, including COVID-19 status and cancer treatment features. Results A total of 1472 patients were included; the median age was 55 years (range 19–97). Most patients (85.8%, n = 1263) had solid neoplasia, 13.5% (n = 198) hematologic neoplasia, and 0.7% (n = 11) others. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 8.6% (n = 126), 1.2% (n = 18) were probable, 1.6% (n = 24) suspected, and 88.6% (n = 1304) negative cases. Overall, 51.6% of patients (n = 759) had cancer treatment delays, 42.5% (n = 626) changed treatment delivery (endovenous to oral systemic therapy), and 12.6% (n = 185) of cases cancer therapy was discontinued. In total, 10.3% (n = 117) of patients whose disease was controlled or in remission, experienced progression of disease during the state of emergency. A total of 6.7% (n = 98) of patients died, of whom 73.5% (n = 72) died from disease progression; 18.4% (n = 18) from SARS-CoV-2 infection and 8.1% (n = 8) from undetermined causes. Patients with hematological malignancies [hazard ratio (HR): 5.11 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99–13.07)] and no response to therapy before the onset of the pandemic [5.01 (1.44–17.42)] had an increased risk of death among COVID-19 infected individuals, whereas advanced clinical stage [5.09 (2.37–10.95)] and discontinuation of treatment [3.66 (1.97–6.78)] were risk factors among non-COVID-19 patients. Conclusion Our study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has an adverse impact on the outcomes of Peruvian cancer patients. In our cohort, cancer mortality was higher than COVID-19 disease mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is a mature peripheral T-cell neoplasm caused by the Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1). HTLV-1 infects up to 10 million people worldwide and is most endemic in Southwestern Japan, the Caribbean basin, South America, and Western Africa. In Latin America (LA), Peru and Brazil have the highest prevalence of HTLV-1-related diseases, however, data on ATLL in other LA countries is scarce. ATLL carries a dismal prognosis and is essentially incurable by conventional drugs. We describe the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, and disease outcome of ATLL encountered in 11 countries in LA. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients (pts) diagnosed with ATLL between January 1995 and December 2019. ATLL cases were classified according to the Shimoyama criteria into acute (A), lymphomatous (L), chronic (C) and smoldering (S). Treatment approaches used as first-line therapy were: 1) chemotherapy alone; 2) combined chemotherapy with zidovudine/interferon-alpha (AZT-IFN); and 3) AZT-IFN alone, as previously done with Miami cohort (Malpica and Ramos et al. Blood Advances 2018). Treatment response was assessed according to Tsukasaki et al. (JCO 2009) criteria. To be classified as complete response (CR), partial response and stable disease, these had to persist for a period of at least 4 weeks. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank test. RESULTS: A total of 253 pts with ATLL were identified. Two hundred twenty six pts (L=122, A=73, C=26, S=5) had sufficient data for analysis. Demographic and clinical features are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. Median age at diagnosis was 57 years, with a female predominance in A (58%) and S (100%) types. Most ATLL pts were from Peru (n=159, 63%) followed by Chile (n=44, 17%), Argentina (n=20, 8%) and Colombia (n=17, 7%). B symptoms were high present in A, L and C types (73%, 72%, 58% vs. 8% S type, respectively, p=0.011). Hypercalcemia was highly associated with A type (57% vs. L 27%, p=0.014). The PIT score yielded to a more aggressive risk classification compared to the IPI score (high-risk: 55% vs. 29%, respectively, p<0.001). Strongyloidiasis (n=5) and pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (n=5) were the most commonly observed co-infections at diagnosis. Commonly affected extranodal sites other than bone marrow in all subtypes were skin 25% (n=63) and liver 9% (n=24). The therapy approach used during the first 2 therapy evaluations are summarized in Table 2. The median survival (MS) times were 4.3 months, 7.9 months, 21.1 months, and not reached for A, L, C and S form, with 4-year survival of 8%, 22%, 40% and 80%, respectively (Figure 2). First-line AZT-IFN resulted in overall response (OR) rate of 63% (CR 24%) for A (n=8) and 75% (CR 50%) for L (n=8), respectively (Table 3). The OR rates after first-line multi-agent chemotherapy alone for A vs. L were 21% (CR 8%) and 41% (CR 29%), respectively (Table 3). The most commonly used regimens were CHOP/CHOP-like (n=117, 59%) and CHOEP (n=40, 20%) regimens with OR rates of 29% (CR 12%) and 60% (CR 42%), respectively (Table 3). Progression-free survival (PFS) rates in pts with aggressive ATLL who achieved CR after chemotherapy vs. AZT-IFN (alone or in combination with chemotherapy) were 2.8 months vs. 30.4 months for A (n=8) type and 67.1 months vs. 17.7 months for L (n=30) type, respectively (Figure 3). Only 2 pts with L type underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) with PFS of 12 and 17 months (Table 4). CONCLUSION: ATLL continues to carry a dismal outcome with conventional therapies thus urging the development of novel approaches. Our study found that Latin American ATLL variant presents at a younger age, has a female predominance, high incidence of L type, low incidence of indolent types and lower survival rates, suggesting that Latin American ATLL variant presents earlier and more aggressively than in Japanese pts. AZT-IFN produced durable responses in A type patients who achieved CR as compared to chemotherapy alone. Chemotherapy responses were more durable in L types who achieved CR as compared to A type. In conclusion, in the management of aggressive ATLL, chemotherapy remains the preferred choice for L type (with consideration of allo-HSCT upfront), while AZT-IFN is a good option to attempt for A type upfront. Figure Disclosures Peña: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; BindingSite: Research Funding. Idrobo:Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Tecnofarma: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Altamirano:Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen: Other: Servicio de Hematologia. Perini:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria. Castillo:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kymera: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ramos:NIH: Research Funding. Villela:Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau.

Introduction: Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a very heterogenous disease and corresponds to approximately 15% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases. PTCL is divided into several subtypes, however, PTCL not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) is the most frequent, with a proportion of 26% of all PTCL cases. There is a lack of demographic and clinical data about PTCL-NOS in middle- and low-income countries, where patients' access to early diagnosis and otherwise standard care might be suboptimal. The objective of this study is to describe the population of PTCL-NOS patients in Latin America, specifically from the countries conforming the "Grupo Latinoamericano de Linfomas" (GELL), in order to better understand clinical behavior and find possible prognostic factors that might prognosticate overall survival (OS). We specifically evaluated the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and serum albumin as potential prognostic factors. Methods: An observational, retrospective and analytical study was conducted during the period from January 2000 through January 2018. A total of 200 Latin American patients with a pathological diagnosis of PTCL-NOS were included. Clinical data were gathered from clinical records. NLR ≥4 and serum albumin ≤3.5 g/dl were considered adverse prognostic factors. Median Overall Survival (mOS) and 5-year Overall Survival (5y-OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were performed to identify adverse prognostic factors for OS. Data were analyzed and interpreted using STATA 15. Results: A total of 200 patients with a diagnosis of PTCL-NOS were included. 50% of patients were ≥60 years, 57% were male, 50% had ECOG ≥2, 40% had elevated serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) level, 70% showed stage III/IV disease, bone marrow involvement was present in 37% of patients, B symptoms in 65%, 33% presented with hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) score was high-intermediate in 33% and high in 14% of cases. The Prognostic Index for PTCL-U (PIT) risk score was high-intermediate in 32% and high in 26% of cases. Serum albumin <3.5 mg/dl was seen in 58%, and NLR ≥4 in 37% of patients. Median OS (mOS) for the entire cohort was 0.83 years (95% CI 0.58-1.75) and 5-year OS rate was 31% (95% CI 23-40%). Patients with serum albumin levels <3.5 g/dL had mOS of 0.42 years (95% CI 0.25-0.75) and 5-year OS rate of 20% (95% CI 9-33%), while patients with albumin ≥3.5 g/dL had mOS of 5.1 years (95% CI 0.83-not reached) and 5-year OS rate of 51% (95% CI 36-65%) (log-rank p<0.001). The mOS for NLR <4 was 1.67 years (95% CI 0.75-4.92) with 5-year OS rate of 37% (95% CI 25-48%) while for NLR ≥4, the mOS was 0.58 years (95% CI 0.25-1.00) and 5-year OS rate was 23% (95% CI 12-36%) (log-rank p=0.02). Cox proportional Hazard regression multivariate analyses found serum albumin <3.5 g/dL (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.10-3.05; p=0.02) and ECOG ≥2 (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15-3.30; p=0,01) were associated with a worse OS. Serum albumin remained an adverse prognostic factor for OS after adjustment for the IPI and the PIT scores (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.01-2.75; p=0.047, and HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.03-2.80; p=0.038, respectively). Conclusion: This multi-institutional Latin American study showed that serum albumin level <3.5 g/dL was an adverse prognostic factor for OS, independent from the IPI and the PIT scores, in Latin American patients with a diagnosis of PTCL-NOS. The survival rates of Latin American patients with PTCL-NOS appear lower than in developed countries. Disclosures M: Merck-Sharp-Dome: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche-Mexico: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Peña:Novartis: Other: Congress inscription and flights; Tecnofarma: Other: Congress inscription and flights; Roche: Other: Congress inscription and flights; Biotoscana: Other: Congress inscription and flights; Janssen: Other: Congress inscription and flights; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paredes:Tecnofarma: Honoraria. Rojas:ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abello:Takeda: Other: Participation in advisory board meeting. Castillo:Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.