Background: Patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) are usually placed in respiratory isolation awaiting three sputum smear microscopy results for acid-fast bacilli (3AFB). GeneXpert MTB/ RIF (Xpert) on a pooled sample from two sputa may allow for more rapid de-isolation. Objectives: To compare the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of Xpert performed on a single pooled sputum sample ('pooled Xpert') to 3AFB, in order to exclude PTB in patients placed in respiratory isolation. Methods: Hospital inpatients in respiratory isolation for possible PTB were enrolled prospectively. Three expectorated sputum samples were obtained for smear microscopy. Two of the same samples had 0.5 ml removed from each and pooled for pooled Xpert. The diagnostic accuracy of pooled Xpert and 3AFB were assessed and compared to liquid culture at 8 weeks as the reference standard. Results: Of 56 participants, nine (16.1%) were diagnosed with PTB. Compared to liquid culture, pooled Xpert had a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 57-99%) and NPV of 97.9% (95% CI 89-99%). 3AFB had a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% CI 35-88%) and NPV of 93.5% (95% CI 83-98%). Conclusions: A single pooled Xpert was non-inferior to 3AFB, with a strong trend towards greater sensitivity and better NPV. These findings support the use of a single pooled Xpert as an effective rapid screening approach for ruling out PTB in low incidence settings. Its value in high incidence settings and optimal combination with smear microscopy and culture warrant further evaluation.

BackgroundCellulitis requiring intravenous therapy can be managed via out of hospital programs, but a high number of patients are still admitted to hospital.ObjectiveWe aimed to review the clinical features, management and outcomes of patients with cellulitis requiring intravenous therapy in a Hospital in the Home (HITH) program compared to patients who are admitted to hospital.MethodsA prospective cohort study of patients with limb cellulitis requiring intravenous antibiotics was conducted at a metropolitan principal referral hospital.ResultsA total of 100 patients out of 113 eligible patients were recruited. Forty-eight were treated entirely in hospital and 52 were treated entirely or partially via HITH. Patients treated in hospital were older (mean 69.2 vs 56.7 years, p<0.001), less mobile, have more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index mean 2.2 vs 1.2, P=0.005) and more associated active illness. All patients with Eron Class III were admitted to hospital. Patients treated in hospital had a higher incidence of acute renal failure (27.1% vs 3.8%, p=0.001), nosocomial infection (10.4% vs 0.0%, P=0.023), and a higher 28-day hospital readmission rate (10.4% vs 0.0%, P=0.023).ConclusionApproximately half of the patients who require intravenous therapy can be treated via an out of hospital program. Patients admitted to hospital were more unwell and more likely to suffer complications. The presence of comorbid illness does not necessarily exclude participation in HITH and careful selection is essential to ensure safe outcomes.

No abstract