BackgroundThe effectiveness trial “Stress echo (SE) 2020” evaluates novel applications of SE in and beyond coronary artery disease. The core protocol also includes 4-site simplified scan of B-lines by lung ultrasound, useful to assess pulmonary congestion.PurposeTo provide web-based upstream quality control and harmonization of B-lines reading criteria.Methods60 readers (all previously accredited for regional wall motion, 53 B-lines naive) from 52 centers of 16 countries of SE 2020 network read a set of 20 lung ultrasound video-clips selected by the Pisa lab serving as reference standard, after taking an obligatory web-based learning 2-h module (http://se2020.altervista.org). Each test clip was scored for B-lines from 0 (black lung, A-lines, no B-lines) to 10 (white lung, coalescing B-lines). The diagnostic gold standard was the concordant assessment of two experienced readers of the Pisa lab. The answer of the reader was considered correct if concordant with reference standard reading ±1 (for instance, reference standard reading of 5 B-lines; correct answer 4, 5, or 6). The a priori determined pass threshold was 18/20 (≥ 90%) with R value (intra-class correlation coefficient) between reference standard and recruiting center) > 0.90. Inter-observer agreement was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficient statistics.ResultsAll 60 readers were successfully accredited: 26 (43%) on first, 24 (40%) on second, and 10 (17%) on third attempt. The average diagnostic accuracy of the 60 accredited readers was 95%, with R value of 0.95 compared to reference standard reading. The 53 B-lines naive scored similarly to the 7 B-lines expert on first attempt (90 versus 95%, p = NS). Compared to the step-1 of quality control for regional wall motion abnormalities, the mean reading time per attempt was shorter (17 ± 3 vs 29 ± 12 min, p < .01), the first attempt success rate was higher (43 vs 28%, p < 0.01), and the drop-out of readers smaller (0 vs 28%, p < .01).ConclusionsWeb-based learning is highly effective for teaching and harmonizing B-lines reading. Echocardiographers without previous experience with B-lines learn quickly.

Resumo Fundamento: Escores de risco estão disponíveis para uso na prática clínica diária, mas saber qual deles escolher é ainda incerto. Objetivos: Avaliar o EuroSCORE logístico, o EuroSCORE II e os escores específicos para endocardite infecciosa STS-IE, PALSUSE, AEPEI, EndoSCORE e RISK-E na predição de mortalidade hospitalar de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia cardíaca por endocardite ativa em um hospital terciário de ensino do sul do Brasil. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo incluindo todos os pacientes com idade ≥ 18 anos submetidos à cirurgia cardíaca por endocardite ativa no centro do estudo entre 2007 e 2016. Foram realizadas análises de calibração (razão de mortalidade observada/esperada, O/E) e de discriminação (área sob a curva ROC, ASC), sendo a comparação das ASC realizada pelo teste de DeLong. P < 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativoResultados: Foram incluídos 107 pacientes, sendo a mortalidade hospitalar de 29,0% (IC95%: 20.4-37.6%). A melhor razão de mortalidade O/E foi obtida pelo escore PALSUSE (1,01, IC95%: 0,70-1,42), seguido pelo EuroSCORE logístico (1,3, IC95%: 0,92-1,87). O EuroSCORE logístico apresentou o maior poder discriminatório (ASC 0,77), significativamente superior ao EuroSCORE II (p = 0,03), STS-IE (p = 0,03), PALSUSE (p = 0,03), AEPEI (p = 0,03) e RISK-E (p = 0,02). Conclusões: Apesar da disponibilidade dos recentes escores específicos, o EuroSCORE logístico foi o melhor preditor de mortalidade em nossa coorte, considerando-se análise de calibração (mortalidade O/E: 1,3) e de discriminação (ASC 0,77). A validação local dos escores específicos é necessária para uma melhor avaliação do risco cirúrgico. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 114(3):518-524) Palavras-chave: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/mortalidade; Endocardite/complicações; Mortalidade Hospitalar; Medição de Risco. AbstractBackground: Risk scores are available for use in daily clinical practice, but knowing which one to choose is still fraught with uncertainty. Objectives: To assess the logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and the infective endocarditis (IE)-specific scores STS-IE, PALSUSE, AEPEI, EndoSCORE and RISK-E, as predictors of hospital mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for active IE at a tertiary teaching hospital in Southern Brazil. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including all patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent cardiac surgery for active IE at the study facility from 2007-2016. The scores were assessed by calibration evaluation (observed/expected [O/E] mortality ratio) and discrimination (area under the ROC curve [AUC]). Comparison of AUC was performed by the DeLong test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: A total of 107 patients were included. Overall hospital mortality was 29. . The best O/E mortality ratio was achieved by the PALSUSE score (1.01,, followed by the logistic EuroSCORE (1.3, 95%CI: 0.92-1.87). The logistic EuroSCORE had the highest discriminatory power (AUC 0.77), which was significantly superior to EuroSCORE II (p = 0.03), STS-I...

The diffusion of smart-phones offers access to the best remote expertise in stress echo (SE). To evaluate the reliability of SE based on smart-phone filming and reading. A set of 20 SE video-clips were read in random sequence with a multiple choice six-answer test by ten readers from five different countries (Italy, Brazil, Serbia, Bulgaria, Russia) of the "SE2020" study network. The gold standard to assess accuracy was a core-lab expert reader in agreement with angiographic verification (0 = wrong, 1 = right). The same set of 20 SE studies were read, in random order and >2 months apart, on desktop Workstation and via smartphones by ten remote readers. Image quality was graded from 1 = poor but readable, to 3 = excellent. Kappa (k) statistics was used to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement. The image quality was comparable in desktop workstation vs. smartphone (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 0.7, p = NS). The average reading time per case was similar for desktop versus smartphone (90 ± 39 vs. 82 ± 54 s, p = NS). The overall diagnostic accuracy of the ten readers was similar for desktop workstation vs. smartphone (84 vs. 91%, p = NS). Intra-observer agreement (desktop vs. smartphone) was good (k = 0.81 ± 0.14). Inter-observer agreement was good and similar via desktop or smartphone (k = 0.69 vs. k = 0.72, p = NS). The diagnostic accuracy and consistency of SE reading among certified readers was high and similar via desktop workstation or via smartphone.

Background Hyper-contractile phenotype of the left ventricle (LV) is generally considered prognostically benign, but recent data challenge this intuitive assumption. Aim To assess the effects of resting LV function on survival. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we recruited 5,122 patients (age 65±11.1 years, 2974 males, 58%) with chronic coronary syndromes referred for resting transthoracic echocardiography with technically successful volumetric echocardiography in 14 accredited laboratories. All recruiting centers had a structured follow-up program with &gt;90% follow-up rate. In each patient, we quantitatively assessed (by Simpson's biplane, apical single-plane or parasternal linear method) LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF). As a load-independent index of LV contractility, LV force was estimated as systolic blood pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/ESV. All-cause death was the only considered outcome end-point. Results EF was 59±11% (normal reference sextile = 58.0–59.9%). Force was 4.51±2.11 mmHg/ml (normal reference sextile = 3.50–4.27 mmHg/ml). The correlation between EF and force was linear (r=0.585, p&lt;0.001). After a median follow-up of 862 days, there were 265 all-cause deaths. Considering EF values, mortality was lowest in the highest sextile (&gt;67%) and significantly higher in the lowest sextile (EF &lt;52%): see figure, left panel. A U-shaped curve was found with force, with mortality values being lowest in the middle sextile and significantly higher in the lowest sextile (&lt;2.59 mmHg/ml) and in the highest sextile (&gt;6.36 mmHg/ml): see figure, right panel. At multivariable analysis, after adjustment for age, diabetes, EF, and prior myocardial infarction, both the highest sextile of force (HR 1.84, 95%, confidence intervals 1.12–3.03 p=0.015), and the lowest sextile of force (HR 1.77, 95%, confidence intervals 1.08–2.90 p=0.024) were associated with decreased survival. Conclusion Sub-normal values of resting ejection fraction and super- and sub-normal values of the force are associated with worse survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. This U-shaped curve of mortality is detectable only with the force, a load independent index of LV contractility: too much of a good thing such as LV contractility can be dangerous on the long-run. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.