Purpose: We evaluated the impact of varicocele grade on the response to varicocelectomy or spermatic vein embolization. Materials and Methods: We systematically reviewed the published English language literature to identify studies on changes in semen quality and pregnancy outcomes after varicocele treatment, stratified by varicocele grade. Descriptive statistics and continuous random effects models were used to study the impact of varicocele grade and the surgical approach on the response to treatment. Result heterogeneity among studies was analyzed using the I 2 statistic. Quality assessment of nonrandomized studies was done with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Publication bias was analyzed using funnel plots and the Egger test. Results: We identified 20 studies describing the outcome of varicocele treatment stratified by varicocele grade in a total of 2,001 infertile men with varicocele. A microsurgical approach (inguinal, subinguinal and/or Palomo) was used in 11 of the 20 studies (55%). Varicocele treatment was associated with improvements in sperm concentration and overall motility in patients with all grades of varicocele. Semen quality improvements were directly related to varicocele grade. The mean sperm concentration improvement in men with grades 1, 2, 2-3 and 3 varicoceles were 5.5, 8.9, 12.7 and 16.0 million sperm per ml, respectively. The mean improvement in the percent of overall motility in men with grades 1, 2, 2-3 and 3 varicoceles was 9.6%, 10.6%, 10.8% and 17.7%, respectively. Pregnancy outcomes were assessed but could not be analyzed systematically due to the lack of adequate published data. Conclusions: Mean improvements in the sperm concentration and the percent of overall motility after treatment of grade 1 varicocele were statistically significant but small in magnitude. In contrast, mean improvements in the sperm concentration and the percent of overall motility after treatment of grade 2-3 varicoceles were greater and highly likely to be clinically significant. Incorporating varicocele grade into shared decision making discussions with affected couples may improve the ability to select patients who are the best candidates for treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

Literature suggests access to robotic surgery varies by race and payer status. We seek to investigate whether disparities exist in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery among the pediatric urology population at our tertiary academic medical center and, if so, to find plausible reasons why. Methods: Retrospective analysis identified patients who underwent open or robotassisted laparoscopic surgery by a single surgeon at a tertiary care center between 2008 and 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined the relationship of patient demographic and socioeconomic factors to procedure approach. Results: Among 356 patients, race, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and year of surgery were significant by univariate analysis. Insurance status was not significant (P = 0.066). Multivariate analysis indicated that age, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and year of surgery were statistically significant (P < 0.001, P = 0.005, P < 0.001). By multivariate logistic regression, Black and Hispanic patient race were not significant with an odds ratio of 0.60 (0.35-1.02) (P = 0.061). In 60.2% of open cases, open approach selection was attributable to complex pathology, limitations of robotic approach, and surgeon's robot-assisted laparoscopic learning curve. Conclusions: Optimal procedure approach was determined by case complexity and surgeon's robot-assisted laparoscopic learning curve and was independent of patient race and payer status. This study did not find racial or socioeconomic disparities in robotic surgery within pediatric urology at our tertiary medical center, inconsistent with previous literature.

Background: Although the technology has been available and several pilot studies have shown success, use of telemedicine has previously been limited in the United States, especially among surgeons. This study aimed to investigate the benefits and obstacles for successful implementation of telemedicine visits in paediatric surgical subspecialties amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We analysed survey data from telemedicine visits with paediatric surgical subspecialists from May 1 through June 30, 2020 at our paediatric surgery subspecialty clinics. Univariate logistic regression was used to determine associations in survey responses and various demographic factors. Results: There were 164 respondents to the survey. The most frequently cited barrier to care was ability to get time off work (46.3%). Overall satisfaction with the telemedicine visit was 93.8%, and 55.6% responded that they would choose video telemedicine rather than an in-person or telephone visit. Those living at least 25 miles from the hospital had increased odds of indicating interest in using telemedicine for future visits (OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.12–5.86, p = 0.026). The average respondent saved between 30 minutes and 1 hour, and 45 minutes using telemedicine. Conclusions: The implementation of telemedicine at our institution in the paediatric surgical subspecialties has proven to be effective and well-received. Given the benefits of time and money saved for families, paired with high satisfaction rates and continued interest, paediatric surgical subspecialists should work to incorporate virtual visits into regular patient care, even well after the COVID-19 pandemic. Level of Evidence: Level IV