The present study aimed at investigating the time span it takes to remove a static mechanical allodynia (SMA) in humans suffering from chronic peripheral neuropathic pain. Forty-three subjects were included in the study and, during somatosensory rehabilitation, their SMA territory was precisely mapped. They then underwent distant vibrotactile counter stimulation (DVCS) treatment. It was observed that, with DVCS, SMA disappeared in all cases, and was transformed into an underlying hypoaesthesia. It was found that the ''tenderness to touch'' symptom (which is SMA) was located in the same territory as the underlying hypoaesthesia, which was located on a part of the cutaneous territory of a partially damaged nerve. These results demonstrate that treating patients suffering from neuropathic pain with DVCS revealed a skin territory of denervation that was previously masked by SMA. Thus, SMA can be considered as a paradoxical painful hypoaesthesia. Furthermore, mapping SMA is a valuable source of information for our understanding of abnormal sensory processing in neuropathic pain patients. We conclude that the mapping of the zone of hypersensitivity on the skin in humans suffering from chronic peripheral neuropathic pain improves diagnosis. The mapping of the zone of hypersensitivity is a tool to presume which branch of the peripheral nerve is damaged. The location of the axonal lesions is at the periphery, while the mechanism of pain sensitization is probably central and referred peripherally to the skin by a painful hypoaesthesia.
Objective
There is a need for reliable and valid clinical assessment tools for quantifying allodynia in neuropathic pain. Allodynography has been proposed as a useful standardized procedure for clinical assessment of mechanical allodynia. This study (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02070367) undertook preliminary investigation of the measurement properties of allodynography, a new standardized clinical examination procedure for mapping the area of cutaneous allodynia.
Methods
Persons with pain in one upper extremity after complex regional pain syndrome, a peripheral nerve injury, or who had recently experienced a hand fracture were recruited for assessment of static mechanical allodynia (based on perception of a 15g force stimulus delivered by Semmes-Weinstein monofilament #5.18 as painful) by two raters at baseline; the assessment was repeated one week later.
Results
Single-measures estimates suggested inter-rater reliability for allodynography was excellent at an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.97 (N = 12); test–retest reliability was also excellent at ICC = 0.89 (N = 10) for allodynography (P < 0.001 for both). Confidence intervals’ lower bounds confirm inter-rater reliability as excellent (0.90) but were less definitive for test–retest (0.59).
Conclusions
This preliminary study supports the inter-rater and test–retest reliability of allodynography. Studies on larger samples in multiple contexts and reporting other measurement properties are warranted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.