Introduction: Traumatic cervical artery dissections are associated with high mortality and morbidity in severely injured patients. After finding even higher incidences than reported before, we decided to incorporate a dedicated head-and-neck computed tomography angiogram (CT-A) in our imaging routine for patients who have been obviously severely injured or, according to trauma mechanism, are suspected to be severely injured. Materials and Methods: A total of 134 consecutive trauma patients with an ISS ≥ 16 admitted to our level I trauma center during an 18 month period were included. All underwent standardized whole-body CT in a 256-detector row scanner with a dedicated head-and-neck CT-A realized as single-bolus split-scan routine. Incidence, mortality, patient and trauma characteristics, and concomitant injuries were recorded and analyzed in patients with carotid artery dissection (CAD) and vertebral artery dissection (VAD). Results: Of the 134 patients included, 7 patients had at least one cervical artery dissection (CeAD; 5.2%; 95% CI 1.5–9.0%). Six patients (85.7%) had carotid artery dissections, with one patient having a CAD of both sides and one patient having a CAD and contralateral VAD combined. Two patients (28.6%) showed a VAD. Overall mortality was 14.3%, neurologic morbidity was 28.6%. None of the patients showed any attributable neurologic symptoms on admission. The new scanning protocol led to further 5 patients with suspected CeAD during the study period, all ruled out by additional magnetic resonance imaging with angiogram (MRI/MR-A). Conclusion: A lack of specific neurologic symptoms on admission urges the need for a dedicated imaging pathway for severely injured patients, reliable for the detection of cervical artery dissections. Although our modified CT protocol with mandatory dedicated CT-A led to false positives requiring additional magnetic resonance imaging, it likely helped reduce possible therapeutic delays.

Background and Objectives: The standard diagnostic procedure for a patient with a suspected polytrauma injury is computed tomography (CT). In individual cases, however, extended acute imaging using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide valuable and therapy-relevant information. The aim of our cohort study was to find such cases and to describe their characteristics in order to be able to give possible recommendations for MRI application in acute trauma situations. Materials and Methods: In the study period from 2015–2019, an evaluation of the imaging performed on polytrauma patients was carried out. The specific diagnostic and therapeutic criteria of the MRI group were further defined. Results: In total, 580 patients with an ISS ≥16 (injury severity score) were included in the study. Of these 580 patients, 568 patients received a CT scan and 12 patients an MRI scan as part of the initial diagnostic. Altogether, 66.67% of the MRIs took place outside of regular service hours. The main findings for MRI indications were neurological abnormalities with a focus on myelon injuries. Further MRI examinations were performed to rule out vascular injuries. All in all, 58.3% of the MRIs performed resulted in modified therapeutic strategies afterward. Conclusions: MRI in the context of acute diagnostic of a severely injured patient will likely remain reserved for special indications in the future. However, maximum care hospitals with a high flow of severely injured patients should provide 24/7 MR imaging to ensure the best possible care, especially in neurological and blunt vascular injuries.

Background and Objectives: Abdominal trauma among severely injured patients with an injury severity score (ISS) of 16 and above can lead to potentially life-threatening injuries that might need immediate surgical intervention. Traumatic injuries to the diaphragm (TID) are a challenging condition often accompanied by other injuries in the thoracoabdominal region. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the occurrence and clinical course of TID among severely injured patients treated at our center between 2008 and 2019 and compared them to other groups of severely injured patients without TID. Results: Thirty-five patients with TID and a median ISS of 41 were treated in the period mentioned above. They were predominantly middle-aged men and mostly victims of blunt trauma as a consequence of motor vehicle accidents. A total of 70.6% had left-sided TID, and in 69.6%, the size of defect was larger than 10 cm. The diagnosis was made with computed tomography (CT) in 68.6% of the cases, while in 25.8%, it was made intraoperatively or delayed by a false-negative initial CT scan, and in 5.7%, an intraoperative diagnosis was made without preoperative CT imaging. Surgical repair was mostly conducted via laparotomy, performing a direct closure with continuous suture. A comparison to 191 patients that required laparotomy for abdominal injuries other than TID revealed significantly higher rates of concomitant injuries to several abdominal organs among patients suffering from TID. Compared to all other severely injured patients treated in the same period (n = 1377), patients suffering from TID had a significantly higher median ISS and a longer mean duration of hospital stay. Conclusions: Our findings show that TID can be seen as an indicator of particularly severe thoracoabdominal trauma that requires increased attention from the treatment team so as not to miss relevant concomitant injuries that require immediate intervention.

ZusammenfassungGemäß der Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (EU-DSGVO, Mai 2018) werden anonymisierte Datensätze mit ausreichend hoher Datendichte als nachverfolgbar eingestuft und benötigen eine Einwilligungserklärung, wenn diese zu Forschungs- oder Qualitätskontrollzwecken zentral ausgewertet werden. Qualitätssicherung und weitere Steigerung der Versorgungsqualität sind im Rahmen der flächendeckenden Schwerstverletztenerhebung im Sinne der Versorgungsforschung allerdings nur mit einer annähernden Vollerhebung möglich. Die über 600 deutschen Kliniken, die am TraumaRegister DGU® teilnehmen, versuchen, von diesem speziellen Patientengut die Einverständniserklärungen zu erhalten. In der Studienklinik wurden über einen 12-Monats-Zeitraum hinweg die Rate an Einwilligungen und die Gründe für eine Ablehnung bzw. Nichteinholung evaluiert.Bei Anwendung eines ressourcenintensiven Workflows speziell für die Patientenaufklärung und Einholung der TR-Einwilligungen wurden eine Zustimmungsquote der Patienten von 64,5 % und damit gleichzeitig eine Fehlquote von 35,5 % erfasst. Es konnten 98 von 276 potenziellen TraumaRegister-DGU®-Datensätzen nicht eingegeben werden und standen dementsprechend weder für die Qualitätskontrolle noch für die Polytraumaforschung zur Verfügung.Um die Qualitätskontrolle und die weitere Verbesserung der Versorgungsqualität zu gewährleisten, ist eine annähernde Gesamterfassung des Patientenguts notwendig. Diese lässt sich durch die Notwendigkeit der Einwilligungserklärung jedoch nicht erreichen, wie unsere Studie zeigt. Somit plädieren wir dafür, dass die Möglichkeit geschaffen wird, den TraumaRegister-Datensatz ohne Einwilligung zu erheben, da dieser letztlich einen Regeldatensatz darstellt, vergleichbar mit dem §21-KHEntgG-Datensatz, jedoch im Gegensatz zu diesem pseudonymisiert.