Neste artigo, estudamos a comunidade surda, grupo vulnerável que sofre com a desigualdade social enquanto minoria linguística pelo olhar de profissionais que lidam com essa comunidade. Para tanto, nos fundamentamos na Análise Crítica do Discurso, cujo foco principal é analisar os discursos de problematizações sociais que atingem os vulneráveis. Isso posto, o objetivo é analisar os discursos de profissionais que trabalham com a comunidade surda contidos em comentários, no Facebook, sobre o tema da redação do ENEM 2017. O diálogo teórico envolve os Estudos Surdos e a Análise Crítica do Discurso. Para atender às análises linguísticas, utilizamos as categorias da Gramática Sistêmico-Funcional, e, por se tratar de uma pesquisa de cunho social, empregamos a metodologia qualitativa-interpretativista. Como resultado, os discursos dos profissionais, engajados com a causa surda, nos levou a reflexões discursivas e sociais sobre a visão solidária que se deve ter da causa surda.
The Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) has the political-academic objective of analyzing the meanings of discourses, denouncing the vulnerability of social subjects. This chapter is the result of the research work plan PID9768-2021/UFS - CRITICAL STUDY OF DISCURSIVE AND SOCIAL PRACTICES OF SUBALTERN GROUPS: FROM TRAINING TO INFORMATION AND ITS UPDATE IN THE TIME OF COVID-19, whose general objective was to verify the institutional actions of federal public universities in Brazil (UFS and UFSC), in the initial period of the COVID-19 pandemic, with guidelines and information for the deaf public. Of a qualitative-interpretative nature, the research mapped the first informative videos about the pandemic that were made available to its deaf students. The theoretical and methodological contribution points out the stages of a research in CDA, based on the Sociological and Communicational Approach to Discourses (ASCD), namely: identifying the social problem that you want to research, understanding the context in which the social problem is inserted; formulate the objectives); the pre-analysis steps (defining the transdisciplinary interfaces and choosing the categories for analysis); the third step would be the analysis itself (verifying the meanings of social issues, establishing a link between discursiveness and its various semioses); Finally, we must reflect on the research done. In the research, the interpersonal and ideational metafunctions were observed. We included aspects of the situational context of LSF, considering the point of view of exclusion of the right to information that the deaf experienced.
The objective of the study is to apply eight hypotheses of the socioanalysis for the interpretation and critical social reading of the "self-narratives" of deaf applicants to Higher Education at the Federal University of Sergipe (UFS-Brazil). It is located in the theoretical-methodological field of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), and Deaf Studies (DS). We will analyze a narrative of a deaf subject, corpus collected in 2014, in the college entrance examination for the Brazilian Sign Language Course (LIBRAS), and adopt this methodological guideline, to define object of study; identify areas of interfaces that meet the objectives; select the categories of each area of interface; establish the dialogue between categories; identify the social meanings constructed in the discourse. The result confirms the role of socioanalysis in seeking to unveil how the practice of social relations and (re)construction of their identities in the struggle for citizenship rights articulate in the deaf individual's life.
Iguaçu, PR, Brazil 2021, published, in Portuguese, with changes as a book chapter: Intercultural human rights and education of the deaf: a reading under the lens of critical discourse analysis. In: BATISTA, Fabiano Eloy Atilio. Art: multiculturalism and cultural diversity 2.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.