Twelve 10 mm implants were placed into immediate extraction sockets in dogs. Six implants were isolated with PTFE membranes and 6 sites served as controls. Standardized clinical measurements were taken at test and control sites. At 18 weeks the dogs were anesthetized and flaps were laid for the purpose of obtaining clinical measurements. The average gain of bone around augmented implants was 2.6 mm, while control sites had an average bone gain of 1.0 mm. Ridge width adjacent to augmented sites increased by 1.2 mm and control sites had an increased width of 0.6 mm. Histologic evaluation of test and control specimens showed greater bone formation around augmented implants. Implants augmented with PTFE membranes had clinically significant amounts of bone regeneration when compared with controls.

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare, longitudinally, the effectiveness of scaling and root planing, osseous surgery, and the modified Widman procedures. The study was carried out in a private practice setting. Sixteen adult patients with moderate to advanced adult periodontitis were treated with initial scaling and oral hygiene procedures. Posthygiene data were used for comparison of changes in probing depth, clinical attachment levels and gingival recession. The initial examination data were used to compare changes in plaque and gingival indices. Frequency distributions were used to compare changes that occurred at individual sites. At one year, plaque and gingival indices were significantly reduced when compared with the initial examination. At one year, shallow pockets (1-3 mm) were reduced when compared to posthygiene. Four- to six-millimeter pockets were significantly reduced by the three procedures. Osseous surgery and modified Widman had significantly greater pocket reduction when compared with scaling. For pockets greater than 7 mm, osseous surgery and the modified Widman had significantly greater reduction when compared with scaling. For pockets 1-3 mm at one year osseous surgery had significantly greater clinical attachment loss when compared with scaling. For 4-6 mm pockets at one year, the three procedures had slight gains in clinical attachment levels. The results were similar for pockets with greater than 7 mm. Interproximal soft tissue craters were measured for six postoperative weeks. Initially, the modified Widman had a higher percentage of soft tissue craters when compared with osseous surgery. At six weeks, however, there were no significant differences when the surgical procedures were compared. Recession was measured at each examination. Recession for 1-3 mm pockets at one year was greater for osseous surgery when compared with scaling and the modified Widman. Recession for 4-6 mm and greater than 7 pockets was greater for the surgical procedures than scaling. The results from this study indicate that with three-month maintenance recalls, both the modified Widman and osseous surgery are effective for pocket reduction, and each will produce a slight gain of clinical attachment over one year. Scaling was effective at maintaining attachment levels but was not as effective in reducing pocket depth.

This 5-year clinical trial demonstrates that with good patient maintenance excellent clinical results can be achieved with various methods of treatment. Within the limits of this study, SRP, OS, and MW were effective at reducing probing depths with slight changes in clinical attachment levels.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship of alveolar bone morphology to tooth shape and form. 111 dry skulls were evaluated at Baylor College of Dentistry (Dallas, Texas). The skulls were arbitrarily divided into flat, scalloped and pronounced scalloped anatomic profiles according to alveolar bone anatomy. The number of buccal dehiscences and fenestrations was determined for each skull according to their anatomic morphotype. 10 skulls from each group were selected for bone height measurements. The measurements were made with a periodontal probe and ruler from the height of the interproximal bone to the buccal alveolar crest. Kodachrome slides were used to measure mesial-distal tooth width and length from ten skulls from each anatomic category. The average number of fenestrations for each group was 3.5. The mean number of dehiscences for flat and scalloped skulls was 0.5. The average number of dehiscences for pronounced scalloped was 1.2. There were no significant differences when the groups were compared. The mean distance from the height of the interdental bone to the alveolar crest was statistically significant when the groups were compared (flat 2.1 mm, scalloped 2.8 mm, pronounced 4.1 mm) (Tukey, p = 0.05). There were no significant differences when tooth shapes were compared with bone anatomy. Pronounced scalloped anatomic profiles were slightly narrower when compared with the other groups. The observations reported have treatment ramifications when patients with scalloped or pronounced scalloped morphotypes are being considered for dental implant placement.