RESUMOObjetivos: Verificar o valor da artroscopia na investigação e no tratamento da dor no joelho pós-artroplastia não esclarecida por exames clínicos e subsidiários. Métodos: Entre 402 pacientes submetidos à artroplastia total ou unicompartimental de setembro de 2001 a abril de 2007 num hospital universitário público, 17 deles apresentavam dor na articulação protética, sem diagnóstico clínico, radiográfico, laboratorial, cintilográfico ou por ressonância nuclear magnética. Todos foram submetidos à artroscopia e a sintomatologia foi avaliada pela escala de Lysholm, comparando-se os períodos pré e pós-artros copia. Os achados intraoperatórios foram registrados. Resultados: O procedimento foi eficaz para alívio do sintoma doloroso em 14 dos 17 pacientes (82,35%). A mediana do escore de Lysholm subiu de 36 pontos antes da artroscopia para 94 pontos após (p < 0,001). A maioria dos pacientes (12) apresentava como diagnóstico artroscópico um quadro de fibrose conhecido como "ciclope"; nos outros cinco pacientes foi verificada sinovite anterior. Todos foram tratados com ressecção. Conclusões: A artroscopia do joelho pós-artroplastia em pacientes com dor persistente a diagnosticar revela quadros de artrofibrose localizada ("ciclopes") ou de sinovite, que podem ser tratados pelo mesmo procedimento, resultando em melhora do quadro álgico. Descritores

Fibular head avulsion fractures are rare and are so-called the arcuate signal. Avulsion fracture of the iliotibial band and anterolateral ligament is known as a Segond fracture, and it is another rare entity. We describe the case of a 27-year-old woman who was hit by a car and suffered polytrauma, mainly suffering injuries to both knees. Radiographs of the knees showed a Segond fracture associated with the arched signal bilaterally. The aim of this study is to present a rare case report and literature review of a bilateral fibular head avulsion fracture associated with an anterolateral tibial avulsion fracture.

Objectives: Assess the worthiness of arthroscopy in investigating and treating knee pain after arthroplasty unexplained by clinical and subsidiary examinations. Methods: Among 402 patients submitted to total or unicompartimental arthroplasty between September 2001 and April 2007 at a public university hospital, 17 presented with pain on prosthetic articulation, without clear diagnosis by clinical, X-ray, laboratory, scintiscan, or nuclear magnetic resonance tests. All patients were submitted to arthroscopy and symptoms were assessed by using the Lysholm scale, comparing pre-and post-arthroscopy periods. Peroperative findings have been recorded. Results: The procedure was effective for pain relief in 14 of 17 patients (82.35%). The median for Lysholm scale climbed from 36 points before arthroscopy to 94 points after the procedure (p < 0.001). Most of the patients (12) were arthroscopically diagnosed with fibrosis known as “cyclop”; on the remaining five patients, anterior synovitis was found. All patients were treated by resection. Conclusions: Knee arthroscopy after arthroplasty in patients presenting unclear persistent pain shows localized arthrofibrosis (“cyclops”) or synovitis, which can be treated by using the same procedure, resulting in pain relief.