Burn pain can cause psychologic and functional difficulties, and is difficult to predict from wound depth. The initial painful stimulation of nerve endings by the burn with continued painful stimuli result in peripheral and central mechanisms causing amplification of painful stimuli, and the development of chronic pain syndromes that can be difficult to treat. In order to assess the effect of analgesic interventions it is essential to measure the patient's pain in a simple and reproducible manner. A number of tools exist for this measurement, ranging from longer and more detailed techniques such as the McGill pain questionnaire most suited to relatively stable pain, to visual analogue scores and picture-based scores for children. Pain management begins with the acute injury, with initial measures such as cooling of the burn and use of inhalational agents such as oxygen/nitrous oxide mixtures. On arrival in hospital, for any but trivial burns, intravenous opioids are appropriate and should be administered as small intravenous boluses titrated against effect. Following the initial resuscitation, pain may be divided into background pain and that associated with procedures. These often require different analgesic interventions. Background pain may be treated with potent intravenous opioids by infusion or patient controlled analgesia and then on to oral, less potent opioids, followed by other oral analgesics. Often drug combinations work best. More severe procedural pain may be treated with a variety of interventions from a slight increase in therapy for the background pain to more potent drugs, local blocks, or general anaesthesia. In addition to drug-based methods of managing burn pain, a number of nonpharmacologic approaches have been successfully employed including hypnosis, auricular electrical stimulation, massage, and a number of cognitive and behavioural techniques.

This study was designed to measure ischaemic pain during and after infusion of adenosine. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, eight ASA 1 male volunteers received infusion of adenosine 100 micrograms kg-1 min-1 or placebo for 10 min. This was repeated 1 week later with the alternate infusion. Pain measurements were made during tourniquet-induced ischaemia in an exercising arm before infusion, during infusion and for 24 h afterwards. Pain was reduced significantly in the adenosine group compared with the saline group during infusion (median difference 20.8; 95% confidence interval 2.0-40). There was no significant difference in pain after infusion and there were no significant changes in cardiovascular variables. During infusion of adenosine, transient mild chest discomfort, shortness of breath and facial flushing occurred. We conclude that adenosine had measurable effects on ischaemic pain which were not sustained after discontinuation of infusion.

No abstract

SummaryBurn dressing changes require profound analgesia for a short duration. This study aimed to determine whether an operator-adjusted target-controlled infusion of alfentanil could provide effective analgesia for burn dressing changes. Ten patients with a burn of between 5 and 50% of body surface area were studied. Pain scoring was performed before, during and following the dressing change. Target and effect site concentrations of alfentanil were recorded during and for 15 min after the dressing change. Median baseline visual analogue pain score (VAS) was 22 mm. Median (range) duration of dressing change was 35 (20±75) min. Median (range) VAS during the dressing change was 30 (14±66) mm. All patients were satisfied with their pain relief. There was no respiratory depression or cardiovascular instability. No patient became sedated and there were no episodes of nausea or vomiting. Median (range) total dose of alfentanil was 2.6 (1±10.7) mg. This study supports the efficacy of an operator-adjusted target-controlled infusion of alfentanil to provide analgesia for burn dressing changes.

No abstract