An increase in dietary protein from 15% to 30% of energy at a constant carbohydrate intake produces a sustained decrease in ad libitum caloric intake that may be mediated by increased central nervous system leptin sensitivity and results in significant weight loss. This anorexic effect of protein may contribute to the weight loss produced by low-carbohydrate diets.

An increase in dietary protein from 15% to 30% of energy at a constant carbohydrate intake produces a sustained decrease in ad libitum caloric intake that may be mediated by increased central nervous system leptin sensitivity and results in significant weight loss. This anorexic effect of protein may contribute to the weight loss produced by low-carbohydrate diets.

Plasma ghrelin levels rise before meals and fall rapidly afterward. If ghrelin is a physiological meal-initiation signal, then a large oral caloric load should suppress ghrelin levels more than a small caloric load, and the request for a subsequent meal should be predicted by recovery of the plasma ghrelin level. To test this hypothesis, 10 volunteers were given, at three separate sessions, liquid meals (preloads) with widely varied caloric content (7.5%, 16%, or 33% of total daily energy expenditure) but equivalent volume. Preloads were consumed at 0900 h, and blood was sampled every 20 min from 0800 h until 80 min after subjects spontaneously requested a meal. The mean (+/- SE) intervals between ingestion of the 7.5%, 16%, and 33% preloads and the subsequent voluntary meal requests were 247 +/- 24, 286 +/- 20, and 321 +/- 27 min, respectively (P = 0.015), and the nadir plasma ghrelin levels were 80.2 +/- 2.8%, 72.7 +/- 2.7%, and 60.8 +/- 2.7% of baseline (the 0900 h value), respectively (P < 0.001). A Cox regression analysis failed to show a relationship between ghrelin profile and the spontaneous meal request. We conclude that the depth of postprandial ghrelin suppression is proportional to ingested caloric load but that recovery of plasma ghrelin is not a critical determinant of intermeal interval.

Loss of body fat by caloric restriction is accompanied by decreased circulating leptin levels, increased ghrelin levels, and increased appetite. In contrast, dietary fat restriction often decreases adiposity without increasing appetite. Substitution of dietary carbohydrate for fat has been shown to increase the area under the plasma leptin vs. time curve (AUC) over the course of 24 h. This effect, if sustained, could explain the absence of a compensatory increase in appetite on a low fat diet. To clarify the effect of dietary fat restriction on leptin and ghrelin, we measured AUC for these hormones in human subjects after each of the following sequential diets: 2 wk on a weight-maintaining 35% fat (F), 45% carbohydrate (C), 20% protein (P) diet (n = 18); 2 wk on an isocaloric 15% F, 65% C, 20% P diet (n = 18); and 12 wk on an ad libitum 15% F, 65% C, 20% P diet (n = 16). AUC for leptin was similar on the isocaloric 15% F and 35% F diets (555 +/- 57 vs. 580 +/- 56 ng/ml.24 h; P = NS). Body weight decreased from 74.6 +/- 2.4 to 70.8 +/- 2.7 kg on the ad libitum 15% F diet (P < 0.001) without compensatory increases in food consumption or AUC for ghrelin. Proportional amplitude of the 24-h leptin profile was increased after 12 wk on the 15% fat diet. We conclude that weight loss early in the course of dietary fat restriction occurs independently of increased plasma leptin levels, but that a later increase in amplitude of the 24-h leptin signal may contribute to ongoing weight loss. Fat restriction avoids the increase in ghrelin levels caused by dietary energy restriction.