This article or writing aims to find out and analyze the legal rules governing land consolidation and how to carry out the consolidation of rural land on the ulayat lands of indigenous peoples in Samosir Regency. The problem is focused on the legal arrangements governing land consolidation and procedures for implementing land consolidation. To answer the problems in this paper, the theory of the legal system and the theory of legal certainty are used. This research uses normative legal research. In essence, normative legal research is the main legal research considering that the main source of law in the legal system that applies in Indonesia is the law. This study concludes that: The Laws governing Land Consolidation are as follows: (a) Law no. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles; (b) Law no. 17 of 2007 concerning the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) for 2005-2025; (c) Law no. 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning; (d) Law no. 1 of 2011 concerning Housing and Settlements; (e) Law no. 20 of 2011 concerning Flats; (f) Government Regulation No. 16 of 2004 concerning Land Use; (g) Presidential Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning the National Medium Term Development Plan (RPJMN) 2015-2019

The purpose of this research is to analyze the application of human rights, the obstacle factors and efforts to overcome them against the suspected perpetrators of motor vehicle theft at the investigation stage at the Medan Police. The research method used is descriptive method, while the data analysis technique uses qualitative. The results of the study indicate that the Medan Police as a law enforcement officer has tried to implement human rights in carrying out investigations into criminal acts of ranmor, and still prioritize the purpose of the investigation, which is to make the case clear and find the suspect. The obstacles faced in the effort to implement human rights for ranmor suspects are: the police must try to fully uncover the ranmor case even with various examination techniques, the intervention of the ranmor victim during the investigation and while in detention, being given lessons in the form of physical violence, and the behavior of the suspect who often does not cooperative during the investigation process so as to force the investigator to conduct an examination using physical force. The efforts that can be made to overcome the obstacles faced in the effort to implement human rights for ranmor suspects are: trying to fully uncover the case without using physical violence, firmly rejecting all forms of intervention from victims of the ranmor crime, and providing understanding for the ranmor suspect on the importance of attitude. cooperatively during the investigation for the purpose of mutual interest.