BackgroundTo analyse the extent and profile of outpatient regular dispensation of antipsychotics, both in combination and monotherapy, in the Barcelona Health Region (Spain), focusing on the use of clozapine and long-acting injections (LAI).MethodsAntipsychotic drugs dispensed for people older than 18 and processed by the Catalan Health Service during 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. First and second generation antipsychotic drugs (FGA and SGA) from the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification (ATC) code N05A (except lithium) were included. A patient selection algorithm was designed to identify prescriptions regularly dispensed. Variables included were age, gender, antipsychotic type, route of administration and number of packages dispensed.ResultsA total of 117,811 patients were given any antipsychotic, of whom 71,004 regularly received such drugs. Among the latter, 9,855 (13.9%) corresponded to an antipsychotic combination, 47,386 (66.7%) to monotherapy and 13,763 (19.4%) to unspecified combinations. Of the patients given antipsychotics in association, 58% were men. Olanzapine (37.1%) and oral risperidone (36.4%) were the most common dispensations. Analysis of the patients dispensed two antipsychotics (57.8%) revealed 198 different combinations, the most frequent being the association of FGA and SGA (62.0%). Clozapine was dispensed to 2.3% of patients. Of those who were receiving antipsychotics in combination, 6.6% were given clozapine, being clozapine plus amisulpride the most frequent association (22.8%). A total of 3.800 patients (5.4%) were given LAI antipsychotics, and 2.662 of these (70.1%) were in combination. Risperidone was the most widely used LAI.ConclusionsThe scant evidence available regarding the efficacy of combining different antipsychotics contrasts with the high number and variety of combinations prescribed to outpatients, as well as with the limited use of clozapine.

After the expiration of trastuzumab data exclusivity, biosimilar drugs were approved by regulatory agencies; among them, CT-P6 which was approved for the treatment of HER2-positive early- and advanced-breast cancer (BC) in 2018. Yet, reference trastuzumab (RTZ) is often combined with pertuzumab in early BC (EBC) patients treated with chemotherapy as it significantly improves the pathological complete response rate. Unfortunately, scarce preclinical and clinical data exists about the combination of CT-P6, pertuzumab and chemotherapy. Therefore, our aim was to study in vitro and in a retrospective cohort of EBC patients, whether CT-P6 was equivalent to RTZ when combined with pertuzumab with or without taxanes. In BT-474 and SKBR3 HER2+ cells we found that CT-P6 alone or in combination with pertuzumab had the same negative effect on cell proliferation, colony formation and HER2 downregulation as well as downstream activation, as RTZ. Adding paclitaxel to these treatments increased their effectivity to a similar extent. In HER2 1+ neuregulin-secreting MB-MDA-175 cells, combinations of CT-P6 or RTZ with pertuzumab were also effective, and mainly dependent on HER3:HER2 heterodimerization. In a retrospective cohort of 44 EBC HER2+ patients treated with neoadjuvant RTZ or CT-P6 in combination with pertuzumab and chemotherapy, we found no differences in efficacy or in adverse events. Moreover, the costs of CT-P6-based treatments were reduced by 1474.07 €/patient. All together we provide pre-clinical and clinical evidence of the equivalence of CT-P6 in combination with pertuzumab and chemotherapy and suggest studying these combinations also in HER2 low/negative BC patients.

PurposeMedicines in special situations (MSS) refer to off‐label or to unlicensed drugs under investigation (compassionate use). Our objectives were to evaluate characteristics and to estimate overall survival (OS), event‐free survival (EFS), and the duration of treatment (DT) of MSS used for cancer treatment at a multicentre comprehensive cancer institution.MethodsRetrospective cohort study on adult cancer patients for whom an MSS treatment was requested (January 2011–December 2020). A descriptive analysis was performed and median OS and EFS and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Survival curves were stratified by type of tumor, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status (PS), age, sex, treatment stage and type of drug (mechanism of action and target).ResultsTreatment was initiated in 2092 episodes (1930 patients) out of 2377 MSS episodes (2189 patients) requested, 33% for hematological treatment and 87% for advanced stage cancer. Median OS (months) was 21.1 (95% CI 19.4–22.7), median EFS was 5.6 (95% CI 5.1–6.0) months, and median DT was 4.5 [0.0; 115.3] months.OS and EFS statistically significantly favored female patients, ECOG PS ≥2 episodes showed worse OS and EFS outcomes (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences in survival were found within solid and hematological cancer, disease stage, drug mechanism of action, and type of cancer (p < 0.001) but not for age. Survival outcomes by tumor subtype and drug are presented both globally and separately based on disease stage.ConclusionMSS uses are practiced across almost all cancer types, mostly for advanced disease. ECOG PS ≥2, along with advanced disease, was related to worse survival. Information about real‐world outcomes is valuable and contributes to better decision‐making regarding MSS and our experience in this field could be of interest for other colleagues.