Background and aims. Severe Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) forms with very aggressive clinical evolution are still common, despite prophylactic measures. Besides the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), there are other angiogenic factors, like Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAS), that might be associated with this disorder. Our study aims to evaluate the role of VEGF and Angiotensin II (ANG II) in the development of early severe OHSS, in high risk patients under prophylactic Cabergoline therapy. Material and Methods. We recruited 192 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures with high risk for OHSS development. Out of these, 106 patients with OHSS were enrolled in the study, of which 28 subjects had a severe form of disease (group I), and 78 patients had a mild/ moderate form (group II). We collected blood and follicular fluid from our study participants and determined serum and follicular VEGF and ANG II levels using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) technique. Results. Follicular VEGF, ANG II, and serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in group I versus group II. Serum VEGF titers were 645.97 versus 548.62 (p = 0.0008), follicular VEGF titers were 2919.52 versus 1093.68 (p < 0.0001), and follicular ANG II levels were 281.64 versus 65.76 (p < 0.0001). No significant differences have been shown between the two groups for serum ANG II levels. Conclusion. Our study results provide evidence of a OHSS phenotype that is more prone to undergo severe clinical forms of disease, despite treatments with VEGF receptor blockers, and show that ANG II appears to play a major role alongside VEGF, in the development of these severe forms of disease.

“Poor responders” (PR) are an important category of infertile women who experience a modest response to controlled ovarian stimulation. In this study, we evaluated response to growth hormone (GH) administration among PR patient subtypes stratified by follicle stimulation hormone receptor (FSHR) polymorphism (c.2039A > G p.Asn680Ser). We conducted a cohort study of 125 women with poor ovarian response, 58 of whom received GH in addition to the standard treatment, and 67 of whom received the standard treatment only. The Ala307Thr polymorphism genotypes were analyzed using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method, and the FSHR gene polymorphism was analyzed using a predesigned TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay (rs6166). A comparative analysis detected statistically significant differences in mean mature follicles (p = 0.0002), metaphase-II oocytes (p = 0.0005), progesterone levels (p = 0.0036), and IGF levels (follicle IGF1, p = 0.0004) between GH-treated and non-GH-treated participants with the FSHR (Ser/Ser) polymorphism. However, the differences were modest among participants with the other two FSHR polymorphisms (Ser/Asn and Asn/Asn). The subcategory of patients with the FSHR Asn680Ser (Ser/Ser) polymorphism showed a stronger response when GH was added to the IVF protocol.