In previous studies, we showed that blood monocyte elaboration of interleukin 1 (IL-1), a known stimulator of bone resorption, was higher in osteoporotic patients with rapid bone turnover than in those with slow turnover and in nonosteoporotic subjects. Since an acceleration of bone loss following menopause contributes to the risk of osteoporosis in women, we have studied the effects of menopause and ovarian steroid treatment on IL-1 release by monocytes obtained from nonosteoporotic and osteoporotic women. IL-1 activity in the monocyte culture medium derived from untreated postmenopausal women (nonosteoporotic and osteoporotic) was higher than in the medium derived from either untreated premenopausal or estrogen/progesterone-treated postmenopausal women. A significant negative correlation was found between IL-1 and years since menopause in both the healthy (r = -0.75; P < 0.005) and the osteoporotic (r = -0.61; P < 0.01) untreated postmenopausal women. The difference between the two slopes was significant at P < 0.05. Premenopausal IL-1 levels were achieved within 8 years of menopause in the nonosteoporotic, but not in the osteoporotic, subjects in whom increases were evident as long as 15 years after menopause. IL-1 also correlated inversely with vertebral mineral density (r = -0.37; P < 0.05), as measured by quantitative computed tomography. In prospective studies, treatment with estrogen/ progesterone for 1 month caused a substantial highly significant decrease in IL-1 activity in each of three nonosteoporotic and five osteoporotic women, confirming the apparent effect of hormone therapy observed in the cross-sectional analysis. Although a cause-effect relationship has not been established, it is our hypothesis, based on these data, that alterations in IL-1 production may underlie the postmenopausal acceleration in bone loss and its inhibition by ovarian steroids. Persistent elevation of IL-1 secretion appears to be a feature of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Postmenopausal osteoporosis is an extremely common disabling condition characterized by a reduced bone mass and a heightened risk of fracture (1). It stems in part from a dramatic acceleration of bone loss that begins in the perimenopausal period and lasts for 5-10 years thereafter (2-4). The bone loss is attributable to a defect in bone remodeling in which bone resorption is excessive (5).Although estrogen deficiency underlies (2-4) and estrogen therapy mitigates this defect (6-8), the nature ofthe estrogenresponsive resorption stimulus is unknown. There are no consistent changes in the levels of endocrine resorption stimulators, parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (9, 10), and plasma calcitonin, an inhibitor of resorption, while lower in women than in men (11), is not remarkably diminished in postmenopause (12). These findings have suggested that estrogen may act by modifying the production of one or more of the local factors now known to influence remodeling events. Among the most potent of these is interleukin 1 (IL-1), one of seve...
Coherence therapy, also known as ADFR (activate, depress, free, repeat) therapy, has been proposed as a new form of treatment for osteoporosis. We compared the effects of this therapy with those of gonadal steroid and calcium and of calcium alone in 93 osteoporotic women. Thirty women were treated for 1 yr with ADFR, in the form of K-phosphate (1.5 g/day), for 3 days followed by etidronate, (400 mg/day) for 14 days, followed by 8 weeks of neither drug, plus continuous calcium carbonate therapy (1 g/day). Thirty-six women received conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg/day) for 25 days/month plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg/day) for 10 days/month and calcium, while 27 women received calcium carbonate (500 mg, twice daily). Sixteen women in the ADFR group, 15 in the calcium group, and 19 in the hormone-calcium group completed 2 yrs of treatment. Spinal bone mineral density was measured by single energy quantitative computerized tomography (QCT) and in the proximal and distal radius by single energy photon absorptiometry. The 3 groups were similar in age, initial bone mass, years since menopause, and dietary calcium intake. After 2 yrs, the mean women in the ADFR therapy group had a mean reduction of 8.0% in spinal QCT (P less than 0.05), and no change in proximal radius mineral content/bone width (BMC), and distal radius BMC. The group treated with calcium only had a decrease of 3.8% in QCT (P less than 0.05), of 5.6% in proximal BMC (P less than 0.05), and of 4.9% in distal BMC (P less than 0.05). The group treated with hormonal replacement and calcium had no change in any of their measurements. The relative bone loss in the spine at the end of the study was greater in the ADFR group than in the hormone-calcium group (P less than 0.05). Bone loss in the calcium group was slightly but not significantly greater than that in the hormone group and lower than that in the ADFR group. In conclusion, these preliminary results indicate that the ADFR regimen using phosphate and etidronate in doses of 1.5 g/day for 3 days and 400 mg/day for 14 days, respectively, is not as effective as hormonal replacement in preventing trabecular bone loss in osteoporosis, nor it is any more effective than calcium supplementation alone.
Despite apparently adequate calories, calcium, and vitamin D intake, hypovitaminosis D with compensatory PTH elevations occurs, regardless of season, in the nursing home population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.