No abstract

Data from the article by Brodsky et al. (2000) have been examined in order to confirm that the fluctuations they report are not random but have a rhythmic basis, thereby verifying their conclusions regarding the existence of periodicity in protein synthesis. Reasons are outlined why oscillations should be expected in all cellular biochemical studies. Associated practical problems are briefly discussed together with comments on the validity and value of less rigorous methods of analysis. The subject of aliasing is raised as justification for doubting the validity of much published data, especially where periodicity has not been suspected. The existence of oscillations indicates the need for a thorough re-evaluation of our understanding of cell biochemistry.

Life cannot be simply defined in biochemical terms but it is associated with autodynamic behaviour. This fact implies that all aspects of cell biology should be viewed in terms of the resultant temporal features. Theoretical arguments indicate that the dynamic state can be explained only by the existence of periodicity. In accordance with this view, experimental evidence indicates the existence of multiple oscillators and at least some are highly complex, implying that failure to understand aspects of cell biology can stem from inadequate concepts.

No abstract