Background
Delayed enhancement gadolinium MRI is a useful technique to identify myocardial scar. The objective of this study is compare the reproducibility of the scar quantification and characterization based on cardiac MRI.
Methods
10 patients with ischemic ethology underwent to 1,5T DE-MRI acquisition for myocardial scar analysis. Images were processed using a commercial software (ADAS3D-Galgo Medical) and different parameters from scar tissue (mass of the scar, core of scar and border zone expressed in grams) were analysed. Conducting channels evaluation was obtained by the number of corridors and the mass of the border zone of those corridors. To perform this analysis, 2 experienced and 1 non experienced users segmented DE-MRI acquisition in order to evaluate the inter observer variability. Bland-Altman analysis was employed to evaluate the comparison between the measurements.
Results
Inter observer agreement between experienced users was high (table). The mean and the standard deviation of the differences between two measurements for the scar mass was −3,9±14,66 gr. Analysing the scar tissue divided in core and border zone, the mass of these volume tissues were very similar (−3,51±4,56gr and −0,4±12,87gr respectively. Regarding conducting channels characteristics, the mean of the differences was 0±2 for the number of channels and 1,71±7,76 gr for the mass on the border zone of the corridors. Comparing the measurements between one of the experienced users and the beginner user, results were similar but significant differences were found on the mass of the core and the number of channels, with a variability of ±2 channels (table).
Conclusions
Left ventricular scar size and characteristics derived from late gadolinium enhanced post-processed images are highly reproducible between experienced observers.
FUNDunding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None. Table 1 Scar analysis performed by 3 users
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.