Two proteins with seven transmembrane-spanning domains typical of guanosine-nucleotide-bindingprotein-coupled receptors have been identified as cannabinoid receptors ; the central cannabinoid receptor, CB1, and the peripheral cannabinoid receptor, CB2, initially described in rat brain and spleen, respectively. Here, we report the distribution patterns for both CB1 and CB2 transcripts in human immune cells and in several human tissues, as analysed using a highly sensitive and quantitative PCR-based method. CB1 was mainly expressed in the central nervous system and, to a lower extent, in several peripheral tissues such as adrenal gland, heart, lung, prostate, uterus, ovary, testis, bone marrow, thymus and tonsils. In contrast, the CB2 gene, which is not expressed in the brain, was particularly abundant in immune tissues, with an expression level 10-100-fold higher than that of CB1. Although CB2 mRNA was also detected in some other peripheral tissues, its level remained very low. In spleen and tonsils, the CB2 mRNA content was equivalent to that of CB1 mRNA in the central nervous system. Among the main human blood cell subpopulations, the distribution pattern of the CB2 mRNA displayed important variations. The rank order of CB2 mRNA levels in these cells was B-cells > natural killer cells S monocytes > polymorphonuclear neutrophil cells > T8 cells > T4 cells. The same rank order was also established in human cell lines belonging to the inyeloid, monocytic and lymphoid lineages. The prevailing expression of the CB2 gene in immune tissues was confirmed by Northern-blot analysis. In addition, the expression of the CB2 protein was demonstrated by an immunohistological analysis performed on tonsil sections using specific anti-(human CB2) IgG; this experiment showed that CB2 expression was restricted to Blymphocyte-enriched areas of the mantle of secondary lymphoid follicles. These results suggest that (a) CB1 and CB2 can be considered as tissue-selective antigens of the central nervous system and immune system, respectively, and (b) cannabinoids may exert specific receptor-mediated actions on the immune system through the CB2 receptor.Keywords: cannabinoid ; cannabinoid receptors (CB1; CB2) ; human immune system ; B cells; natural killer cells.A-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, the major active component of cannabis, as well as other cannabinoids, are known to exert a wide range of physiological effects such as drowsiness, alterations in cognition and memory, analgesia, orexigenic effects, anti-emetic effects, a decrease in intra-ocular pressure, anti-inflammatory effects and immunosuppression [l]. Many studies have been conducted to decipher the cannabinoid system. First attributed to non-specific cell membrane disruption, the major cannabinoid effects are now thought to be mediated through specific cannabinoid receptors. A guanosine-nucleotide-bindingprotein-coupled receptor of 472 amino-acid residues, CB1, was initially characterized in rat brain [Z] and further cloned both in rat [3] and human [4]. As the expression of the c...

In the present study, we observed evidence of crosstalk between the cannabinoid receptor CB1 and the orexin 1 receptor (OX1R) using a heterologous system. When the two receptors are co-expressed, we observed a major CB1-dependent enhancement of the orexin A potency to activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway; dose-responses curves indicated a 100-fold increase in the potency of orexin-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. This effect required a functional CB1 receptor as evidenced by the blockade of the orexin response by the specific CB1 antagonist, N-(piperidino-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716), but also by pertussis toxin, suggesting that this potentiation is G i -mediated. In contrast to OX1R, the potency of direct activation of CB1 was not affected by coexpression with OX1R. In addition, electron microscopy experiments revealed that CB1 and OX1R are closely apposed at the plasma membrane level; they are close enough to form hetero-oligomers. Altogether, for the first time our data provide evidence that CB1 is able to potentiate an orexigenic receptor. Considering the antiobesity effect of SR141716, these results open new avenues to understand the mechanism by which the molecule may prevent weight gain through functional interaction between CB1 and other receptors involved in the control of appetite.

Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) is a third-generation platinum derivative with an in vitro and in vivo spectrum of activity distinct from that of cisplatin, especially in colon cancer cells. Here, we studied the molecular basis of this difference on the HCT-116 human colon carcinoma cell line (mismatch repair-deficient, wild-type functional p53). Oxaliplatin inhibited HCT-116 cell proliferation with greater efficacy than cisplatin. At comparable concentrations, cisplatin slowed down the replication phase and activated the G 2 -M checkpoint, whereas oxaliplatin activated the G 1 -S checkpoint and completely blocked the G 2 -M transition. With the aim of finding oxaliplatinspecific target genes and mechanisms differing from those of cisplatin, we established the transcriptional signatures of both products on HCT-116 cells using microarray technology. Based on hierarchical clustering, we found that (a) many more genes were modulated by oxaliplatin compared with cisplatin and (b) among the 117 modulated genes, 79 were regulated similarly by both drugs and, in sharp contrast, 38 genes were dose dependently down-regulated by oxaliplatin and, conversely, up-regulated or unaffected by cisplatin. Interestingly, several cell cycle -related genes encoding proteins involved in DNA replication and G 2 -M progression belong to this latter group. RNA modulations, confirmed at the protein level, were in accordance with oxaliplatin-and cisplatin-induced cell cycle variations. Beyond the identification of genes affected by both drugs, the identified oxaliplatin-specific target genes could be useful as predictive markers for evaluating and comparing the efficacy and molecular pharmacology of platinum drugs.[Mol Cancer Ther

Exhaustive analysis of the location of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (PBR) both at the subcellular and the tissue level is warranted to gain a better understanding of its biological roles. To date, many studies have been performed in animal models, such as rat, mouse, and pig, that yielded important information. However, only a few reports were dedicated to the analysis of PBR expression in humans. To enlarge on previous studies, we investigated PBR expression in different human organs using the monoclonal antibody 8D7 that specifically recognized the human PBR. First, we performed electron microscopic analysis that for the first time unambiguously demonstrated the localization of the PBR on the outer mitochondrial membrane. Second, focusing our analysis on human tissues for which information on PBR expression is sparse (lung, stomach, small intestine, colon, thyroid, adrenal gland, pancreas, breast, prostate, ovary), we found that PBR exhibits selective localization. This characterization of PBR localization in human tissues should provide important insights for the understanding of PBR functions.

No abstract