Introduction Since the onset of the Covid-19 Pandemic, Telehealth utilization has grown rapidly; however, little is known about its efficacy in specific areas of healthcare, including trauma care in the emergency department. We aim to evaluate telehealth utilization in the care of adult trauma patients within United States emergency departments and associated outcomes over the past decade. Methods PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, ProQuest, and Cochrane were searched for relevant articles published from database conception to Dec 12th, 2022. Our review includes studies that assessed the utilization of telehealth practices within a United States emergency department for the treatment of adult (age ≥ 18) trauma patients. Evaluated outcomes included emergency department length of stay, transfer rates, cost incurred to patients and telehealthimplementing hospitals, patient satisfaction, and rates of left without being seen. Results A total of 11 studies, evaluating 59,319 adult trauma patients, were included in this review. Telehealth practices resulted in comparable or reduced emergency department length of stay for trauma patients admitted to the emergency department. Costs incurred to the patient and rates of leaving without being seen were significantly reduced following telehealth implementation. There was no difference in transfer rates or patient satisfaction for telehealth practices compared to in-person treatment. Conclusion Emergency department telehealth utilization significantly reduced trauma patient care-related costs, emergency department length of stay, and rates of leaving without being seen. No significant differences were found in patient transfer rates, patient satisfaction rates, or mortality rates following emergency department telehealth utilization.

Introduction Limited research has assessed the effectiveness of Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI) and Modified NFTI (MNFTI) criteria in accurately identifying triage rates in major trauma. We aim to evaluate the predictive capability of NFTI/MNFTI in determining rates of overtriage and undertriage, as well as associated outcomes. Methods A literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, ProQuest, and Cochrane from conception to April 13th, 2023. Studies assessing the utilization of NFTI/MNFTI in identifying over and undertriage rates were included. Additional outcomes including mortality, ICU LOS, and resource allocation were evaluated. Outcomes were compared between NFTI/MNFTI and other triage metrics. Results A total of 8 articles, including 175,650 trauma patients, were evaluated. NFTI utilization was associated with reduced overtriage rates compared to numerous tools including trauma triage matrix (TTM) and need for emergent intervention within 6 h (NEI-6) (NFTI 32.15%, TTM 44.5%, NEI-6 42.23%). Regarding undertriage, NFTI had lower rates than the secondary triage assessment tool (STAT) and TTM (NFTI 14.0%, STAT, 22.3%, TTM 14.3%) as well as Cribari Matrix Method (CMM) (NFTI .8%, CMM 7.6%, P < .0003). Additionally, the utilization of NFTI in combination with CMM yielded a significant reduction in undertriage rates compared to either tool alone (CMM/NFTI 2.7%, NFTI 4.6%, CMM 8.2%). Conclusion Implementation of NFTI/MNFTI resulted in more accurately capturing over and undertriage rates. Similar trends were identified when NFTI was used in combination with CMM. When compared to other triage tools, NFTI outperformed CMM, TTM, STAT, and NEI-6 in overtriage and/or undertriage rates.