Urticaria is a group of diseases that share a distinct skin reaction pattern. Triggering of urticaria by infections has been discussed for many years but the exact role and pathogenesis of mast cell activation by infectious processes is unclear. In spontaneous acute urticaria there is no doubt for a causal relationship to infections and all chronic urticaria must have started as acute. Whereas in physical or distinct urticaria subtypes the evidence for infections is sparse, remission of annoying spontaneous chronic urticaria has been reported after successful treatment of persistent infections. Current summarizing available studies that evaluated the course of the chronic urticaria after proven Helicobacter eradication demonstrate a statistically significant benefit compared to untreated patients or Helicobacter-negative controls without urticaria (p < 0.001). Since infections can be easily treated some diagnostic procedures should be included in the routine work-up, especially the search for Helicobacter pylori. This review will update the reader regarding the role of infections in different urticaria subtypes.
Component-resolved sensitization profiles in HBV allergy suggest predominant IgE sensitization to Api m 10 as a risk factor for treatment failure in HBV immunotherapy.
IL-31represents a novel cytokine involved in pruritic skin diseases including atopic dermatitis (AD). We, therefore, aimed at investigating IL-31 levels in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CU). We included 46 patients with CU, 26 non-atopic skin healthy subjects as negative and 28 patients with AD as positive controls. IL-31 serum levels were analysed using commercial ELISA kit. IL-31 serum levels were higher in patients with CU compared to healthy controls (P < 0.001), but lower compared to patients with AD (P < 0.001). There was no difference in IL-31 serum levels in autologous serum skin test positive or negative CU patients and patients with infectious trigger factors including helicobacter pylori infection. IL-31 serum levels may play a role in the pathophysiology of CU. This is supported by the finding that not all patients with CU respond to antihistamine treatment but to the treatment with immunosuppressive drugs.
SummaryUrticaria is a very common skin disease which was already described in the ancient world. Questions still remain about its pathogenesis and management remain open. Compared to other common skin diseases, the published evidence is rather low. The clinical symptoms with pruritic transient wheals and/or angioedema are caused by mediators (particularly histamine) released by activated mast cells and basophils. The mechanism of target cell activation has not been clarified in detail for most urticaria subtypes. Different urticaria subtypes should be distinguished. Spontaneous forms are more common than inducible forms. Chronic urticaria and urticaria in certain age groups (children, pregnancy) can be difficult to manage. Therefore, international consensus resulting in the regular update of urticaria guidelines can be very helpful. Currently, these updated guidelines include a three-step treatment algorithm for chronic spontaneous urticaria. Only the first step of this algorithm, second generation H1-antihistamine in standard dose, utilized approved drugs. However after omalizumab was established as a third line choice in the guideline algorithm, it has approved in many countries for chronic spontaneous urticaria without response to H1-antihistamines. The exact mechanism of action of omalizumab in urticaria has not been fully elucidated. Unrevealing this mechanism might result in a deeper understanding of urticaria pathogenesis and the development of further therapeutic strategies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.