STUDY QUESTIONDoes the selection of sperm for ICSI based on their ability to bind to hyaluronan improve the clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) (primary end-point), implantation (IR) and pregnancy loss rates (PLR)?SUMMARY ANSWERIn couples where ≤65% of sperm bound hyaluronan, the selection of hyaluronan-bound (HB) sperm for ICSI led to a statistically significant reduction in PLR.WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDSHB sperm demonstrate enhanced developmental parameters which have been associated with successful fertilization and embryogenesis. Sperm selected for ICSI using a liquid source of hyaluronan achieved an improvement in IR. A pilot study by the primary author demonstrated that the use of HB sperm in ICSI was associated with improved CPR. The current study represents the single largest prospective, multicenter, double-blinded and randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of hyaluronan in the selection of sperm for ICSI.DESIGNUsing the hyaluronan binding assay, an HB score was determined for the fresh or initial (I-HB) and processed or final semen specimen (F-HB). Patients were classified as >65% or ≤65% I-HB and stratified accordingly. Patients with I-HB scores ≤65% were randomized into control and HB selection (HYAL) groups whereas patients with I-HB >65% were randomized to non-participatory (NP), control or HYAL groups, in a ratio of 2:1:1. The NP group was included in the >65% study arm to balance the higher prevalence of patients with I-HB scores >65%. In the control group, oocytes received sperm selected via the conventional assessment of motility and morphology. In the HYAL group, HB sperm meeting the same visual criteria were selected for injection. Patient participants and clinical care providers were blinded to group assignment.PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGEight hundred two couples treated with ICSI in 10 private and hospital-based IVF programs were enrolled in this study. Of the 484 patients stratified to the I-HB > 65% arm, 115 participants were randomized to the control group, 122 participants were randomized to the HYAL group and 247 participants were randomized to the NP group. Of the 318 patients stratified to the I-HB ≤ 65% arm, 164 participants were randomized to the control group and 154 participants were randomized to the HYAL group.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEHYAL patients with an F-HB score ≤65% demonstrated an IR of 37.4% compared with 30.7% for control [n = 63, 58, P > 0.05, (95% CI of the difference −7.7 to 21.3)]. In addition, the CPR associated with patients randomized to the HYAL group was 50.8% when compared with 37.9% for those randomized to the control group (n = 63, 58, P > 0.05). The 12.9% difference was associated with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.340 (RR 95% CI 0.89–2.0). HYAL patients with I-HB and F-HB scores ≤65% revealed a statistically significant reduction in their PLR (I-HB: 3.3 versus 15.1%, n = 73, 60, P = 0.021, RR of 0.22 (RR 95% CI 0.05–0.96) (F-HB: 0.0%, 18.5%, n = 27, 32, P = 0.016, RR not applicable due to 0.0% value) over control patients. The study was ori...

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract